Herman, Henry & Dominic | View firm profile
II. Key Considerations for Investors Prior to Engaging in Litigation (cont)
- Adherence to Procedural Conditions
Once an appropriate BIT has been chosen, investors must diligently adhere to its prerequisite conditions to ensure the Investment Arbitration Tribunal’s jurisdiction over their case.These conditions typically manifest in three key clauses:
Cooling-Off Period Clause: This clause mandates investors to engage in earnest negotiations with the Host State before proceeding to arbitration. The duration of this period varies depending on the BIT but commonly spans about 6 months from the dispute’s emergence. Compliance is initiated by the investor sending a notification to the Host State’s competent authority, which varies by country. For instance, in Vietnam, this authority is the Ministry of Justice.
Exhaustion of Local Remedies Clause: Certain BITs require investors to first seek resolution through the Host State’s National Court for a specified period, often 18 months, before escalating to the Investment Arbitration Tribunal. This is to allow the Host State an opportunity to rectify any alleged violations via its judicial system. However, there are exceptions under customary international law where investors can bypass this requirement if they can convincingly demonstrate that a fair and satisfactory outcome is unattainable through the Host State’s courts.
Forks in the Road Clause: This provision in some BITs offers investors multiple dispute resolution options, with the choice of one precluding the others. These options typically include litigation in the Host State’s national courts, suing at an Investment Arbitration, or mediation through an independent party. The choice of method should be made cautiously, as opting for national courts or mediation and not achieving the desired outcome will foreclose the opportunity for International Arbitration.
Investors must recognize that non-compliance with these conditions can significantly delay the arbitration process or even lead to the tribunal’s refusal to hear the case. Navigating these procedural nuances requires meticulous planning and legal expertise. Investors are advised to consult with professionals specializing in international investment law to comprehend the intricacies of the selected BIT. This understanding is crucial for saving time and resources and ensuring the most favorable outcome for the investor.
- Choosing the Right Arbitrator
The selection of arbitrators plays a pivotal role in the Investment Arbitration process, with significant implications for the dispute’s outcome. A fundamental principle in arbitration proceedings is the impartiality and objectivity of arbitrators appointed by any of the disputing parties.
As highlighted in Section 3, any failure by an arbitrator to disclose potential conflicts of interest can lead to perceptions of bias, potentially invalidating the arbitral award due to serious procedural violations. Additionally, choosing an arbitrator lacking in experience or specialization in international investment disputes can compromise the quality and reliability of the arbitral award.
Given these considerations, investors must approach the appointment of arbitrators with diligence and scrutiny. It’s crucial to investigate any potential connections between the arbitrators and the disputing parties, including the Host State and any third-party funders involved, as mentioned in section 3. This helps to quickly rule out candidates who might have conflicts of interest.
Furthermore, factors like the arbitrator’s educational background, professional experience, and their stance in prior similar cases should be carefully examined. Such scrutiny allows investors to gauge the arbitrator’s expertise and predict their decision-making tendencies. Understanding whether an arbitrator may lean towards the investor’s or the Host State’s side can provide valuable insights into the likely direction of the arbitration’s outcome.
For effectively conducting this complex due diligence, the support of a lawyer with extensive experience in the field and a network of professional connections is invaluable. Such legal guidance can greatly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the arbitrator selection process, maximizing the likelihood of a favorable outcome for the investors. This strategic approach ensures that the chosen arbitrator not only upholds the highest standards of impartiality and competence but also aligns with the specific nuances and demands of the investor’s case.
- Specifying Consensus in Arbitration Notice
An often overlooked yet critical aspect of initiating proceedings under a BIT is the investor’s clear expression of acceptance of the Host State’s consent to arbitration through Investment Arbitration, as outlined in the BIT. This explicit declaration is essential for establishing the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal over the claim.
Failure to explicitly express this acceptance in the arbitration notice can give the Host State grounds to challenge the jurisdiction of the Investment Arbitration Tribunal. The Host State might argue that there is no valid legal arbitration agreement between the parties, thus questioning the legitimacy of bringing the case before the Investment Arbitration Tribunals.
To avoid such complications, investors must ensure their arbitration notice is comprehensive and adheres to the basic information requirements set by the BIT and relevant arbitration procedures. This step is crucial for a smooth dispute resolution process and prevents any unnecessary prolongation due to jurisdictional disputes.
In crafting the notice of arbitration, investors should not only affirm their acceptance of the Host State’s consent but also meticulously include all necessary details as stipulated in the BIT. This includes the nature of the dispute, the provisions of the BIT alleged to have been violated, and any other pertinent information required for the tribunal to assert jurisdiction. By doing so, investors can preemptively address any potential jurisdictional challenges from the Host State, thereby streamlining the arbitration process.
This strategy underscores the importance of thorough preparation and attention to detail in the early stages of the arbitration process. It also highlights the necessity of having expert legal counsel who can guide the investor in drafting a precise and effective arbitration notice, tailored to meet the specific requirements of the BIT and the nuances of the case at hand.
III. Conclusion
In today’s global economy, where international investment forms a critical component of economic growth, the ability to adeptly manage disputes is more than a skill—it’s a necessity. A proactive and informed approach to dispute resolution is not just advantageous; it’s imperative for investors looking to safeguard their interests in foreign territories.
To successfully navigate the complexities of Investment Arbitration, the backing of a team of seasoned lawyers, well-versed in international investment law, is indispensable. Their guidance can illuminate the nuances of the process, empowering investors to confront the challenges of this dispute resolution mechanism with confidence and a well-founded optimism for a favorable outcome.
Author: Nguyen Hoang Nguyen Anh