News and developments

The Financial Instrument Test

A. INTRODUCTION

By

enacting the Virtual Financial Assets Act (VFAA), the Maltese Government has

regulated the Blockchain / ICO / DLT industry. The law appoints the Malta

Financial Services Authority (MFSA) as the designated authority to oversee this

business.

Since

this industry has elements of the Financial Service Regulations (namely MiFID),

it is important to clearly distinguish one from the other.

In

order to ensure a clear difference, the MFSA has sought to further clarify the

instances under which the new legislation applies. It has done this by

introducing the Financial Instrument Test, which will be analysed below.

B.

PURPOSE OF THE TEST

The

objective of the Financial Instrument Test (hereinafter ‘the Test') is to

determine whether a Distributed Ledger Technology (‘DLT')

asset falls under:

  • the

    existing Financial Services legislation (e.g. MiFID)

  • the

    proposed Virtual Financial Assets Act (‘VFAA') or

  • is

    otherwise exempt.

    By

    undergoing the Test, the DLT asset will be classified accordingly.

    C.    WHEN TO APPLY THE TEST

    The

    Test will be applied in the following scenarios:

  • In

    an Initial Coin Offering (ICO); and

  • During

    the intermediation of DLT Assets by persons undertaking certain activities in

    relation to such DLT Assets (VFA Services).

    Being

    the designated authority specifically appointed to oversee this business, the

    Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) is proposing that the Test is

    mandatory in the above scenarios.

    In

    addition, the MFSA has also proposed that the Test is confirmed by an

    external reviewer.

    D.

    DEFINITIONS

    It

    is important to take into account the below definitions:

  • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) - means a

    digital or electronic database or ledger which ordinarily is -

    a)

    distributed, shared and replicated;

    b)

    public or private or hybrids;

    c)

    permissioned or permissionless or hybrids;

    d)

    protected with cryptography or equivalent

    forms of encryption; and

    e)

    auditable:

    Provided that this term shall also include any other

    technology that achieves the same ends.

  • DLT Asset - means -

    a)

    A

    Virtual Token; or

    b)

    A

    Virtual Financial Asset; or

    c)

    A

    Financial Instrument

    That

    is intrinsically dependent on, or utilises, DLT.

  • Virtual Financial Asset - a

    VFA is any form of digital medium recordation that is used as a digital medium

    of exchange, unit of account, or store of value and that is not one of the

    following as defined below:

    a)

    Electronic

    Money;

    b)

    Financial

    Instrument; and

    c)

    Virtual

    Token.

    Legal definitions of the above are analysed in our

    brochures:


    Malta

    - ICOs - The New Legislation


    Malta

    - Virtual Financial Asset Services - The New Legislation

    E.

    METHODOLOGY OF THE TEST

    In

    a nutshell, the Test shall consist of a number of checklists. The aim of the

    Test is that the DLT Asset

    is analysed against a set of instruments in a prescribed order.

    If

    the asset falls to be classified under any of these instruments, then by

    default it does not qualify as a Virtual Financial Asset under the new laws,

    and hence the latter shall not apply. It is important to keep in mind that this

    Test is to be used during both ICOs as well as when offering any of the VFA

    Services as regulated by law.

    In

    brief, the following instruments will need to be analysed in the following

    order mentioned below. First there is a focus on Virtual Tokens and then the

    Test progresses to analyse various financial instruments under MiFID.

    F.

    ANALYSIS OF THE VARIOUS

    INSTRUMENTS

    It

    is now important to analyse the details of the Test by analysing the proposals

    of the MFSA:

    1.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as a Virtual Token under the VFAA?

    The proposed definition of a Virtual Token is a DLT

    asset that:

    a.

    Has

    no utility, value or application outside of the DLT platform on which it was

    issued; and

    b.

    That

    cannot be exchanged for funds or legal tender on such platform or with the

    issuer of such DLT asset.

    If

    the DLT Asset qualifies as such under the proposed regulations,

    then it should be exempt under the new laws, and hence the VFAA

    is not applicable.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of a Virtual Token, one has to proceed

    to the next point below.

    2.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as a Transferable Security under MiFID?

    The

    definition of "transferable security" refers to those classes of securities

    which are negotiable on the capital market, (except instruments of payment),

    such as:

    a.

    shares

    in companies or other entities, and depositary receipts in respect of shares;

    b.

    bonds

    or other forms of securitised debt, including depositary receipts;

    c.

    any

    other securities giving the right to acquire or sell any such transferable

    securities or giving rise to a cash settlement.

    The

    main characteristics in order for a DLT Asset to be

    classified as a Transferable Security hence are the following:

  • The

    DLT Asset is negotiable on the capital market; And

  • The

    DLT Asset confers rights analogous to those of shares in company or other

    entities such as:


    Participation

    in the capital of the issuer;


    Right

    to receive proceeds from liquidation of issuer;


    Entry

    in the register of shareholders;


    Right

    to acquire or sell transferable securities -


    Right

    to voting;


    Right

    to dividends or other proceeds from company assets.


    Rights

    to periodical inco/ proceeds derived from

    Or confers rights analogous to bonds such as:


    Principal

    amount due of fixed sum with fixed / variable maturity; or


    Entry

    in the register of debenture holder


    Right

    to sell or acquire

  • Is

    not an instrument of payment.

    If

    the DLT Asset

    falls under any of the above definitions, the applicable regulatory regime is

    the MiFID, and not the VFAA. Hence, the new legislation will not

    apply in this case.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of Transferable Security, one has to

    proceed to the next point below.

    3.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as a Money Market Instrument under MiFID?

    These

    are defined as instruments which are normally dealt in on the money market,

    such as treasury bills, certificates of deposits and commercial papers and

    exclude instrument of payment.

    The

    main features of a Money Market Instruments are the following:

  • Have

    a valued that can be determined at any point in time;

  • Are

    not derivatives; and

  • Have

    a maturity at issuance of 397 days or less; and

  • Have

    features substantively equivalent to treasury bills, certificates of deposits

    or commercial papers.

    If

    the DLT Asset

    falls under any of the above definitions, the applicable regulatory regime is

    the MiFID, and not the VFAA. Hence, the new legislation will not

    apply in this case.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of Money Market Instrument, one has to

    proceed to the next point below.

    4.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as a Unit in a Collective Investment Scheme?

    A

    Collective Investment Scheme is defined as a scheme that has the following

    legally-defined characteristics:

  • Objective

    of the issue is the collective investment of capital

  • The

    scheme operates according to the principle of risk spreading; and either

  • The

    contributions of the participants and the profits or income out of which

    payments are to be made to them are pooled; or

  • At

    the request of the holders, units are or are to be repurchased or redeemed out

    of the assets of the scheme or arrangement, continuously or in blocks at short

    intervals; or

  • Units

    are, or have been, or will be issued continuously or in blocks at short

    intervals.

    If

    the DLT Asset

    falls under any of the above definitions, the applicable regulatory regime is

    the MiFID, and not the VFAA. Hence, the new legislation will not

    apply in this case.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of a Unit in a Collective Investment

    Scheme, one has to proceed to the next point below.

    5.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as a Financial Derivative under MiFID?

    The MiFID gives a detailed definition of ‘derivatives'

    as follows:

  • Options,

    futures, swaps, forward rate agreements and any other derivative contracts

    relating to securities, currencies, interest rates or yields, emission

    allowances or other derivatives instruments, financial indices or financial

    measures which may be settled physically or in cash;

  • Options,

    futures, swaps, forwards and any other derivative contracts relating to

    commodities that must be settled in cash or may be settled in cash at the

    option of one of the parties other than by reason of default or other

    termination event;

  • Options,

    futures, swaps, and any other derivative contract relating to commodities that

    can be physically settled provided that they are traded on a regulated market,

    a MTF, or an OTF, except for wholesale energy products traded on an OTF that

    must be physically settled;

  • Options,

    futures, swaps, forwards and any other derivative contracts relating to

    commodities, that can be physically settled not otherwise mentioned in point 6

    of this Section and not being for commercial purposes, which have the

    characteristics of other derivative financial instruments;

  • Derivative

    instruments for transfer of credit risk;

  • Financial

    contracts for differences;

  • Options,

    futures, swaps, forward rate agreements and any other derivative contracts

    relating to climatic variables, freight rates or inflation rates or other

    official economic statistics that must be settled in cash or may be settled in

    cash at the option of one of the parties other than by reason of default or

    other termination event, as well as any other derivative contracts relating to

    assets, rights, obligations, indices and measures not otherwise mentioned in

    this Section, which have the characteristics of other derivative financial

    instruments, having regard to whether, inter alia, they are traded on a

    regulated market, OTF, or an MTF.

    If

    the DLT Asset

    falls under any of the above definitions, the applicable regulatory regime is

    the MiFID, and not the VFAA. Hence, the new legislation will not

    apply in this case.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of a Financial Derivative Instrument,

    one has to proceed to the next point below.

    6.

    Does

    the DLT Asset qualify as an Emissions Allowance?

    Emission

    Allowance Financial Instruments relate to units recognized for compliance with

    the Emissions Trading Scheme Directive. Emission Allowance is an allowance to

    emit one tonne of Carbon Dioxide or other greenhouse gases (as defined) during

    a specified period, which unit shall be transferable in accordance to the

    Directive.

    In

    order for the DLT asset to qualify as an emissions allowance, it should be

    issued within the national competent authority in accordance to the directive.

    If

    the DLT Asset

    falls under any of the above definitions, the applicable regulatory regime is

    the MiFID, and not the VFAA. Hence, the new legislation will not

    apply in this case.

    If

    it does not qualify under the definition of an Emissions Allowance, then the

    new laws will apply.

    H.

    CONCLUSIONS

    By introducing the Financial Instrument Test, the MFSA has ensured a clear

    distinction between the current Financial Services Laws (MiFID) and the new

    Virtual Financial Asset Act.

    The

    Test will be rendered mandatory and will have to be confirmed by an independent

    verifier. This confirms the importance of the test, as it will have a material

    bearing on which regulatory regime to apply.

    Hence,

    one has to proceed with great caution before embarking on any ICO / DLT

    project, as there might be various laws that might need to be taken into

    consideration. A detailed analysis of the intended project is thus necessary in

    order to ensure legal compliance and avoid severe legal consequences.

    To

    this effect, it is highly advisable that all ICO / Blockchain intended issuers

    seek proper legal advice and guidance at all stages of their project.

    Content supplied by KINANIS LLC