Prince's Chambers
Barristers
Sebastian Hughes
- Phone25257388
- Email[email protected]
Position
“Sebastian is able to digest voluminous authorities and educate the court on the correct law, where opponents have attempted to mislead the court. He has the rare ability to change the mind of judges” – The Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide 2025 (Hong Kong Bar – Commercial Disputes)
“An advocate who always grabs the judge’s attention and never fails to sell the case in the most persuasive manner possible” – The Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide 2021 (Hong Kong Bar – Commercial disputes)
“Excellent: user-friendly and diligent, he is responsive and tech-savvy” – The Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide 2021 (Hong Kong Bar – Intellectual property
Recognised as a Leading Junior, Commercial Disputes and Intellectual Property (The Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide)
Sebastian has a broad civil litigation, arbitration and mediation practice, including intellectual property, commercial, white collar fraud, insolvency, company, employment, matrimonial finance, and costs/taxation matters.
Sebastian is a Fellow of CIArb and a WIPO Approved Neutral. He is an Arbitrator and Mediator with WIPO, HKIAC (Panel of Arbitrators for Intellectual Property Disputes; Panel of Emergency Arbitrators; List of Arbitrators), SCIA, SHAC and AIAC. Sebastian is a Domain Name Panelist with WIPO, FORUM, HKIAC, ADNDRC and AIAC, rendering decisions in both English and Chinese.
Sebastian was admitted to practice as a solicitor in Victoria, Australia in 1998 and in Hong Kong in 2003. Prior to being called to the bar, he was a partner in an international law firm.
Sebastian is a fluent Putonghua speaker.
Career
• CRB (a firm) v Mark Richard Charlton Sutherland [2024] 1 HKLRD 106 (action for solicitors’ fees; summary judgment; application to amend defence and counterclaim; negligence)
• Stephen Mark Drimmer v Hongkong Seiyo International Co Ltd [2023] 1 HKLRD 373 (first instance appeal – security for costs)
• Mary Kay Inc v Zhejiang Tmall Network Co Ltd [2021] 5 HKC 30 (application to set aside service out and to intervene in respect of default judgment application; trade mark infringement and passing off; parallel imports and exhaustion defence – defaced product; liability of Internet platform providers as joint tortfeasors)
• China NPL Holdings Pte Ltd v Mo Haidan [2021] 1 HKLRD 344; [2021] 2 HKC 97 (Court of Appeal) (conflict of laws - appeal from order discharging Mareva injunction based upon PRC judgments)
• Bank of India v Gimajasa & Ors [2021] 3 HKC 387 (trial – guarantee of banking facilities)
• Essilor Manufacturing (Thailand) Co Ltd v G Doulatram and Sons (HK) Ltd & Ors [2021] 3 HKC 167 (application for payment out of money paid into court to discharge proprietary and Mareva injunctions)
• Re Fortune King Trading Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] 3 HKC 429 (appeal against liquidators’ rejection of proof of debt)
• Arboit (Liquidator) v Hu Yan [2018] 4 HKLRD 213 (Court of Appeal) (summary judgment – conversion and unjust enrichment)
• Hugo Boss Trademark v Britain Boss International Co Ltd [2018] 3 HKLRD 401 (Court of Appeal) (trade mark infringement and passing off – application to set aside judgment in default of defence)
• Ling Leung Kit Hing & Anor v Russell James Worth & Ors [2017] 6 HKC 167 (Court of Appeal) (appeal from order striking out statement of claim – water leakage)
• Arboit (Liquidator) v Hu Yan [2017] 5 HKLRD 768 (summary judgment – conversion and unjust enrichment)
• Secretary for Justice v Chun Ngai Jewellery Design Co Ltd (No 2) [2017] 2 HKLRD 1114 (interpleader appeal – recovery of diamond)
• Secretary for Justice v Chun Ngai Jewellery Design Co Ltd (No 1) [2017] 1 HKLRD 536 (interpleader– recovery of diamond)
• Hugo Boss Trademark v Britain Boss International Co Ltd [2015] 3 HKLRD 4 (trade mark infringement and passing off – application to set aside judgment in default of defence)
• Gemology Headquarters International, LLC v Gemological Institute of America, Inc [2014] 5 HKC 145 (application to adduce further evidence and cross-examine on appeal from trade mark opposition decision)
• SLA neé S v HKL (No 1) [2013] 5 HKLRD 117 (application to set aside dispositions of shares in husband’s alter ego company)
• SLA neé S v HKL (No 2) [2013] 5 HKLRD 125 (ancillary relief application, including application for concurrent liability against the husband’s alter ego company – decision of the UK Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 34 applied)
• Chor Ki Kwong David v Lorea Solabarrieta Cheung [2013] 2 HKLRD 95; [2013] 5 HKC 525 (breach of confidence – interlocutory injunction)
• Arko Ship Leasing Ltd v Winsmart International Shipping Ltd [2013] 2 HKLRD 121 (shipping – application to vacate trial date)
• Frey Wille GmbH & Co KG v Complex Industrial Co Ltd [2012] 4 HKLRD 814 (Court of Appeal) (copyright infringement – appeal from summary judgment)
• I-Registry Ltd v John Corner, LLC (WIPO Case No. LRO2013-0015, 8 August 2013)
• Del Monte Corporation v Del Monte International GmbH (WIPO Case No. LRO2013-0001, 29 July 2013) (Presiding Panelist)
Selected arbitration matters
Respondent’s Counsel (HKIAC Rules 2024): Cryptocurrency and intellectual property dispute Sole Arbitrator (HKIAC Rules 2018): Software licensing dispute Sole Arbitrator (HKIAC Rules 2018): Cryptocurrency trading dispute Claimant’s Counsel (CIETAC Rules): IT dispute concerning payment of rebates Co-Arbitrator (HKIAC Rules 2018): Software licensing dispute Emergency Arbitrator (HKIAC Rules 2018): Application for interim relief (Mareva injunction) Sole Arbitrator (UNCITRAL Rules 2013) Sole Arbitrator (ICC Rules): Dispute relating to implementation of Cloud based IT services Sole Arbitrator (HKIAC Rules 2013): 5 references Claimant’s Counsel (HKIAC Rules 2013): 2 references More than 800 domain name decisions handed down to date (in both English and Chinese), as sole panelist, presiding panelist, or co-chair Unreported decisions X-Spot Global Limited v Huobi Global Limited (HCIP 36/2023, 8 December 2023) (trade mark infringement – cryptocurrency; interlocutory injunction; application to stay for arbitration and to set aside service out of the jurisdiction) Yao-Hua Kang v Joe-Hsiang Lin (HCA1926/2020, 18 November 2022) (first instance appeal; costs of withdrawn application for summary judgment; whether the plaintiff knew or ought to have known the defendant had a credible defence; specific performance – discretion to withhold remedy where the plaintiff has no legitimate interest in the information sought (citing White & Carter (Councils) Limited v McGregor [1962] AC 413) Mary Kay Inc v Zhejiang Tmall Network Co Ltd (Court of Appeal, CAMP 301/2021, 15 March 2022) (application for leave to appeal against order to set aside service out and granting leave to intervene in respect of default judgment application; trade mark infringement and passing off; parallel imports and exhaustion defence – defaced product; liability of Internet platform providers as joint tortfeasors) JML-Craft Pty Ltd v China Ping An Insurance (Hong Kong) Co Ltd (HCCT 27/2021, 24 May 2021) (application for interlocutory injunction restraining the surety from making payment under an on-demand bond) Essilor Manufacturing (Thailand) Co Ltd v G Doulatram and Sons (HK) Ltd & Ors (HCA 392/2020, 23 September 2020) (application for payment out of money paid into court to discharge proprietary and Mareva injunctions; application to strike out statement of claim) Nagravision SA v Zhuhai Gotech Intelligent Technology Co Ltd (HCIP 29/2019, 2 July 2020) (application for disposal of issues on points of law and for preliminary issues hearing on a point of law – copyright infringement and enforcement of US judgment) Essilor Manufacturing (Thailand) Co Ltd v Wong Kam Wai (Trading as Sun Wai Lok HK International Company) & Ors (Court of Appeal, CACV 71/2020, 21 May 2020) (appeal against refusal to continue proprietary and Mareva injunctions when the return date had not taken place due to the General Adjourned Period, led by Bernard Man SC) Ferrari North America, Inc v Changhon International Energy Co Ltd (HCA 852/2017, 25 September 2019) (summary judgment against second tier recipients – CEO fraud: unjust enrichment) Kouk Chung Fai v Global Ltd (HCLA 1/2019, 25 September 2019) (application for leave to appeal against order refusing transfer of proceedings from the Labour Tribunal) Ian Richard Carver Cullen v Kaisilk Development Ltd (HCA 584/2017, 12 September 2019) (trial – contract) Withers (a Firm) v Antonia Basile also known as Antonia Basile Wilson (HCMP1162/2016, 4 February 2019) (application for leave to tax solicitors’ bills – first instance appeal) Haribo Ricqles Zan v Nippon Taisun (HK) Limited (Ricolas: trade mark opposition decision, 31 January 2019) D, A v SJG (FCMP 143/2016, 21 August 2018) (application by the mother for costs of proceedings under the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance)Languages
English, Mandarin
Memberships
Council Member, Bar Council, Hong Kong Bar Association (2024)
Council Member, Legal Aid Services Council
Member, Hong Kong Bar Association Committee on Intellectual Property
Education
1996 LLB, University of Melbourne, Australia
1994 BA, University of Melbourne, Australia
1990 Diploma in Chinese Language, Beijing International Studies University
Admissions
2010 Barrister, Hong Kong
2003 Solicitor, Hong Kong
2002 High Court of Australia
1998 Barrister and Solicitor, Victoria, Australia