News and developments
Cross-Border Merger Framework in India: Limited Efficacy?
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) notified Section 234 of the Companies Act, 2013, as amended (the “Companies Act”), and Rule 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016, as amended (the “Companies Merger Rules”), on April 13, 2017, to permit merger and amalgamation of a foreign company with and into an Indian company and vice versa. Further, the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018, as amended (“FEMA Merger Regulations”), on March 20, 2018, to address the gaps in the existing framework from a foreign exchange perspective.
Key provisions under the Companies Act
Prior to 2013, the merger or amalgamation of an Indian company with a foreign company was not permitted under the Companies Act, 1956, as amended (“Erstwhile Act”). The Erstwhile Act defined “transferee company” to only include companies incorporated in India and restricted the scope of cross-border mergers to mergers of foreign companies with and into Indian companies.[1] However, Section 234 of the Companies Act removed this restriction and made Chapter XV (Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations) applicable to all cross-border mergers. Accordingly, Section 234 of the Companies Act, read with Rule 25A of the Companies Merger Rules, provides the framework for cross-border mergers in India.
Pursuant to such provisions, the concerned company is required to seek prior approval from the RBI for any merger or amalgamation with a foreign company or Indian company, as applicable, and file an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) in accordance with Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act and the applicable rules.[2] The scheme for merger may provide for payment of consideration to the shareholders of the merging company in cash, depository receipts or partly in cash and depository receipts, and is required to comply with the requirements of Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, including approval from the shareholders, creditors, tax authorities, etc.[3]
However, the scope for merger of an Indian company with a foreign company is limited to the jurisdictions identified under the Companies Merger Rules. This includes foreign companies incorporated in the jurisdiction:
On May 30, 2022, the MCA notified amendments to Rule 25A of the Companies Merger Rules introducing a new requirement for filing Form No. CAA-16 along with the application filed before the NCLT to confirm government approval in case of a merger with a company incorporated in a country sharing land border with India.[5]
Key Provisions under the FEMA Merger Regulations
The FEMA Merger Regulations define cross-border merger to mean, “any merger, amalgamation or arrangement between an Indian company and foreign company in accordance with Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamation) Rules, 2016 notified under the Companies Act, 2013.” The regulations have further classified cross-border mergers as: (i) inbound mergers- where the resultant company is an Indian company, and (ii) outbound mergers - where the resultant company is a foreign company.[6] Any merger which is undertaken in accordance with the FEMA Merger Regulations will be deemed to have prior approval of the RBI for the purpose of Rule 25A of the Companies Merger Rules provided the following conditions are met (if any of such conditions are not met, prior RBI approval will be required):
In case of an inbound merger:
In addition, in case of an outbound merger, a resident individual may acquire or hold securities in the resultant company in accordance with the limits of the Liberalized Remittance Scheme provided under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1992, as amended and regulations issued thereunder (“FEMA”).[8]
Tax Implications
The exemptions under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) for tax neutrality of merger are available only if the transferee company is an Indian company. Such exemptions are not available in case of merger of an Indian company with a foreign company. Accordingly, the Indian company and its shareholders could be liable to tax in case of merger of an Indian company with a foreign company.
It is also relevant to highlight Section 72A of the IT Act which provides for carry forward and set off of accumulated tax business losses and unabsorbed depreciation in case the merger complies with certain specified conditions. In terms of Section 72A, such benefit will not be available in case of outbound mergers. In addition, in case of inbound mergers, tax losses of the foreign company may not qualify as ‘accumulated losses’ under the provisions of IT Act and therefore may lapse.
Conclusion
The facilitation of outbound mergers under the current legal framework has expanded the scope of cross-border mergers in India. However, as a practical matter, the framework for cross-border mergers in India remains of limited efficacy. Such framework has so far largely been utilized only in the context of merger of foreign wholly owned subsidiaries with and into the Indian holding company[18] or vice versa.[19]
This appears to be on account of several reasons, including: (a) the nature of the conditions for deemed RBI approval under the FEMA Merger Regulations (prior RBI approval is required if such conditions are not met), (b) lack of clarity regarding demergers (Section 234 of the Companies Act refers to mergers and amalgamations only instead of compromise and/or arrangement as used in Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act), and (c) absence of tax benefits in relation to outbound mergers that are otherwise available for domestic mergers subject to specified conditions, including absence of a provision for carry forward and set off of accumulated tax business losses and unabsorbed depreciation.
This insight has been authored by Rajat Sethi (Partner), Sumit Bansal (Partner) and Oshika Nayak (Associate). They can be reached at [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected], respectively, for any questions. This insight is intended only as a general discussion of issues and is not intended for any solicitation of work. It should not be regarded as legal advice and no legal or business decision should be based on its content.
© 2023 S&R Associates
[1] Section 394(4) of the Companies Act, 1956.[2] Rule 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (“Companies Merger Rules”).
[3] Section 234(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.
[4] Annexure B of the Companies Merger Rules.
[5] The Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2022 (notified on May 30, 2022).
[6] Regulation 2 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018 (“FEMA Merger Regulations”).
[7] Regulation 4(1) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[8] Regulation 5(1) and Regulation 5(2) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[9] Regulation 4(2) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[10] Regulation 5(3) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[11] Regulation 4(3) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[12] Regulation 5(4) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[13] Regulation 4(5) and Regulation 5(6) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[14] Regulation 4(6) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[15] Regulation 5(7) of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[16] Regulation 6 of the FEMA Merger Regulations.
[17] Regulation 25A(2) of the Companies Merger Rules.
[18] For example, the Scheme of Amalgamation of Bio Energy Venture-1 (Mauritius) Pvt. Ltd. with Tata Chemicals Limited and Others, 2020 SCC OnLine NCLT 9076, the Scheme of Merger by Absorption of Diamond India DMCC with Diamond India Limited and their respective shareholders, 2020 SCC OnLine NCLT 9224, and the Scheme of Merger by Absorption of Reliance Life Sciences B.V. with Reliance Life Sciences Private Limited and their respective shareholders, 2019 SCC OnLine NCLT 30010.
[19] In the matter of Sigmoid Labs Private Limited and its shareholders and creditors and another, 2020 SCC OnLine NCLT 18859.