Region Area

Barristers

Andrew Tabachnik KC

Andrew Tabachnik KC

Position

Areas of specialisation include: planning, environmental and compulsory purchase; commercial law, in particular financial services and fraud; employment law; public and administrative law. Recent cases include: Heaton v Axa Equity & Law [2002] 2 AC 329, Burkett v London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham [2002] 1 WLR 1593, Adlard v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2002] 1 WLR 2515, Earthline v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2002] 46 EGCS 198, Papmichael v National Westminster Bank [2003] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 341, Constantine v Total Oil [2003] EWHC 428, Singer & Friedlander v Thomas [2003] EWHC 861, Friend v Civil Aviation Authority (no 2) [2001] 4 All ER 385, Desquenne et Giral (UK) Ltd v Richardson [2001] FSR 1.

Career

Called 1991; Inner Temple; admitted to the Bar of New York State 1994; District of Columbia 1999; associate attorney Wiley Rein & Fielding, Washington DC (commercial litigation in Federal and State Courts throughout the United States; filed amicus brief before Supreme Court in City of Boerne, Texas v Flores [1997] 521 US 507) 1996-98.

Languages

Literate in French and Hebrew.

Education

King’s College School, Wimbledon; Pembroke College, Cambridge (1990 BA Hons Law; 1994 MA; Pembroke College Foundation Scholar; Ziegler Prize for Law); Inns of Court School of Law (1991); Columbia University School of Law, New York (1993 LLM; Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar).

Mentions

London Bar

Planning

Leading silk3
Andrew Tabachnik KC – 39 Essex Chambers ‘Andrew loves a challenge and it shows. A strategic thinker who helps bring a team together. He breaks down complex issues into bite-sized chunks. He is an excellent communicator and is able to get points across well. He is committed to delivering successful outcomes for clients.’
London Bar

Professional disciplinary and regulatory law

Leading silk2
Andrew Tabachnik KC –39 Essex Chambers ‘Andrew is one of the most experienced and established silks in this field. He is thorough in preparation, robust in advocacy and forensic in cross-examination.’