Region Area

Barristers

Louise Corfield

Louise Corfield

Work Department

Chancery

Position

Louise specialises in traditional chancery matters, with a strong focus on contentious probate and 1975 Inheritance Act cases. She also has considerable experience in a wide range of trusts and property matters, in particular, ownership of real property and TOLATA disputes. Louise is a qualified and CMC registered mediator, and regularly mediates cases in herareas of specialism. Louise is experienced at conducting trials and applications in the Property, Trusts and Probate List in the Chancery Division of the High Court. She is a strong cross-examiner and is also highly successful at negotiating settlements, whether by mediation, FDR hearing or at the door of Court. She prides herself on giving practical advice and having exceptional client handling skills.

Career

Louise graduated from Trinity College, Oxford with a First Class Jurisprudence Degree in 2007. She began pupilage at No5 in 2008, where she continues to practice. Louise is an active member of Chambers’ Equality and Diversity Committee', the current Chair of the Midland Chancery and Commercial Bar Association, and a committee member of the Association of Contentious Trusts and Probate Specialists.

Memberships

Chancery Bar Association, Midlands Commercial and Chancery Bar Association (Chair), Civil Mediation Council Registered Mediator, Society of Mediators, Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists (Committee Member)

Education

BA Hons Jurisprudence, First Class, Oxford University; BVC graded ‘Very Competent’, Inns of Court School of Law; Inner Temple Major Scholarship (2007).

Mentions

Midland Circuit • Regional Bar

Chancery, probate, and tax

Leading junior1
Louise Corfield – No5 Barristers’ Chambers ‘Louise is a superb, persuasive and strong advocate. She is very bright and user friendly.'
Midland Circuit • Regional Bar

Property and construction

Leading junior1
Louise Corfield  – No5 Barristers’ Chambers ‘The speed at which Louise gets to grips with the information presented to her, even when proceedings have been issued already and a litigant in person is seeking advice late, is second to none. She is a future KC.'