Barristers

James Thacker

Work Department

Crime, Financial Crime

Position

Called 2001 (Gray's Inn), Recorder of Crown Court, SFO Prosecution Panel (A), CPS Prosecution Panel (Grade 4), CPS Serious Crime Panel (Grade 4), CPS Specialist Fraud Panel (Grade 4), Approved to prosecute serious sexual offences and child abuse, Regulatory list (Panel B), Recorder of Senior’s in Hall at Gray’s Inn, Direct Access trained.

Practice Areas Expertise in financial crime, complex and organised crime, sexual offences and child abuse, and regulatory and professional disciplinary proceedings. Prosecutes and defends as leading counsel in high profile, multi-handed cases with factual and legal complexities.

Notable cases: Op. Funsea (Conspiracy to launder ancient art from the Musee des Arts d’Extreme), Op. Widow (people trafficking); Op. Estadio (EncroChat); Op. Edge (Drug conspiracies involving 23 defendants and EncroChat); Op. Enlist (Drug conspiracies involving EncroChat); Op. Labootan (Cocaine Conspiracy with EncroChat); R v WT (stranger rape during national lockdown); R v PJ (death by careless driving); R v T & F (DEFRA EU fraud); Ops. Amaryllis/Ensete (International £7m banking fraud); Ops. Veil nos.1&3 (multi-million tax evasion); R v HP et al (attempt to abort foetus); R v SG (death by dangerous driving); Operation Dinghy (investment fraud); R v Cameira (Legal services fraud); Op. Crystal (Access to Work fraud involving 12 deaf defendants); R v Brad (£3m bank fraud); R v Kayode (£4m Education Trust fraud believed to be ‘Britain’s largest Education Fraud’); Op. Dee (£2m bank fraud), Op. Glider (HMRC fraud); Op. Evergreen (Insider NHS fraud)

Education

LLB (Hons), Birmingham University

Mentions

London Bar

Crime

UNKNOWN1
James Thacker KC – Deka Chambers ‘James is a fearless advocate with a detailed knowledge of the law, which he deploys to maximum effect. He reduces with ease complex technical details into jury friendly language.' 
London Bar

Fraud: crime

UNKNOWN1
James Thacker KC – Deka Chambers ‘James is a fearless advocate with a detailed knowledge of the law, which he deploys to maximum effect. He reduces with ease complex technical details to jury friendly language.'