Region Area

Barristers

Richard Fisher KC

Richard Fisher KC

South Square, London

Position

Richard has a commercial dispute focused practice with a particular specialism in domestic and cross-border reconstruction and insolvency, banking, fraud and financial products/derivatives litigation. He regularly acts in relation to multi-jurisdictional and complex commercial disputes, and is a member of the BVI bar.

In recent years Richard has appeared in various substantial and high-profile cases in England at all levels of tribunal up to the Supreme Court, including disputes arising out of the Lehman Bros insolvency (Waterfall I and IIproceedings, and Firth Rixson), Eurosail, Snoras Bank, Federal Mogul (reinsurance recoveries) and the Servaas state immunity litigation.

He has acted in relation to many of the major recent UK and international insolvencies/restructurings, including Lehman Brothers, House of Fraser, Debenhams, Noble Group, Codere SA, Co-Op Bank, Deutsche Annington, Telecolumbus and Cattles, and has been involved in several long commercial trials in the UK and Cayman Islands (including the Federal Mogul, Primeo v HSBCand the Fortuna shareholder disputes).

Career

Called 2000; (QC 2020) called to the Bar of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court 2009.

Education

University College London (1998 LLB, First Class); Oxford University (1999 BCL, First Class).

Mentions

London Bar

Banking and finance (including consumer credit)

HALL OF FAME3
Richard Fisher KC – South Square ‘Flawless reasoning and legal knowledge. Always able to innovate and advance creative arguments, and willing to take on difficult positions. Richard is a source of immensely calm and collected advocacy delivered in compelling arguments.’
London Bar

Insolvency

HALL OF FAME2
Richard Fisher KC –South Square 'Very commercial. Good strategic strengths. Strong advocate.'
The English Bar Offshore

The English Bar Offshore

HALL OF FAME4
Richard Fisher KC – South Square ‘Richard is an excellent lawyer and very responsive. He is equally strong on paper, in conference and as an advocate. He reads the court and his opponents well, and his submissions are always succinct and clearly delivered.’