In the latest instalment of our student blog, returning blogger Malcolm Glover delves into the current and future role of the Law Commission.
The Law Commission was founded in 1965 by the Law Commission Act 1965 and is an independent permanent full-time body away from political influence. Its primary role is to advance law reform and keep the law under review.
The Law Commission creates new legislation and reforms historic legislation, in particular the Fraud Act 2006 and the Bribery Act 2010.
Reform is necessary. The Commission undertakes extensive research and consultation with experts when reforming a specific area of law. Retrospectively, the Bribery Act was criticised for having laws and procedures without teeth. (1)
Bribery laws followed the Public Bodies Corrupt Practice Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906. In its description as antiquated, the Poulson Scandal (2) highlighted the weakness of bribery law.
The Home Office published a draft consultation in 1997(3) suggesting the reform of anti-bribery law. The Commission published a report titled ‘Legislating the Criminal Code’ (4) aiming to simplify the Act with international obligations. (5)
The Commission’s paper led to criticism of the government by the public. The implementation of the Bribery Act 2010 highlighted the prominent role of the Commission in law reform. Furthermore, the report gained traction from the public emphasising the appropriate reform needed for the law on bribery.
While public interest influences the Executives’ choices of reform, a clear fallacy is the Executives are not bound by recommendations of reform proposed by the Commission, as evident in Offences Against the Person’s Act 1861.
A consultation paper was put forward by the Commission (6), which has been waiting for a response since November 2015. The Lord Chancellor has the jurisdiction to elect experts and former counsel to take a position on the Commission (7), which highlights the issue of its true sovereignty away from political influence and questions the Commission’s true pioneering role in law reform.
The Commission had a pioneering role in revoking offences (8) with concern of compatibility of the Human Rights Act 1998. The Home Secretary could not be advised in providing a statement of compatibility with the rights under the European Convention incorporated into statute. (9)
Although the Commission aids in the modernisation of laws, the methodology of reform can be lengthy, taking years and leading to work being wasted. The government is not bound by the Commission’s recommendations and must wait for Parliament to accept their proposals, which usually takes a long time due to the limited time for pure law reform.
In their tenth programme in 2008, an intention was made to examine the law surrounding “Unfitness to Plead” (10). A report was eventually published in 2016 (11) with the intention of modernisation, fairness, effectiveness, and accessibility, while also being cost-effective.
The Government has yet to respond to the “Unfitness to Plead” project. Although an interim response was made in June 2016 (12). An increased workload of the Commission brings the possibility of a lack of thoroughness in areas of reform, which is a plausible factor in the pioneering role of the Commission as a body.
It is evident that the Law Commission has had a significant role in reforming laws with a success of over 153 implemented reforms since 1966 (13).
Even though one’s stance may still be critical in refuting the Commission’s role due to the lengthy process of reform, the role of the Law Commission should not be undermined. Therefore, the Law Commission is needed during our ever-changing needs of society.
The Commission’s absence threatens public interest bridging the gap between the judiciary and society.
Malcolm Glover
1 Peter Yeoh, ‘Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance’ (2012) 20 JFRC 264.
2 Peter Jones, ‘Re-thinking corruption in post-1950 urban Britain: Poulsen affair 1972-1976’ (2012)
3 Law Commission, Reforming Bribery (Law Com No 185, 2007)
4 Law Commission, Criminal Code for England and Wales (Law Com No 177, 1989)
5 Law Commission, Legislating the Criminal Code: Corruption (Law Com No 248, 1998)
6 Law Commission, Reform of Offences Against the Person (Law Com No 217, 2014)
7 Law Commission Act section 1 (3)
8 Law Commission, ‘Fraud and Deception’(Law Commission, Reforming the law, April 1999)
9 Law Commission, Legislating the Criminal Code Fraud and Deception (Law Com No 155, 1999). Highlighting
the pioneering role of the Commission.
10 Law Commission, ‘Unfitness to Plead’(Law Commission, Reforming the law, April 2008)
11 Law Commission, Unfitness to Plead (Law Com No 364, 2016)
12 Letter from Mike Penning Minister of Parliament to The Honourable Sir David Bean (30 June 2016).
13 Law Commission, ‘Implementation Table’(Law Commission, Reforming the law, 2022)