M&A in Indonesia is generally under the authority of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Ministry of Investment (formerly known as the Investment Coordinating Board). However, other government institutions can also be involved depending on the status and business activities of the target company. If the target company is a listed company, then the Financial Services Authority (OJK) would also be involved.

The key regulations for M&A in Indonesia are:

1. Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, including its amendment, Law No. 6 of 2023,
2. Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, including its amendment, and its relevant and applicable BKPM Regulations,
3. Law No.8 of 1995 on the Capital Markets, including its amendment and other related regulations issued by the OJK, among others:
   1. OJK Regulation No. 54/POJK.04/2015 on Voluntary Tender Offers (“POJK 54/2015“),
   2. OJK regulation No. 74/POJK.04/2016 on Mergers and Acquisitions of Public Companies, as partially revoked by OJK Regulation No. 58/POJK.04/2017 on Electronic Submission of Registration or Submission of Corporate Action,
   3. OJK Regulation No. 9/POJK.04/2018 on Acquisition of Public Companies (“POJK 9/2018”),
   4. OJK Regulation No. 17/POJK.04/2020 on Material Transactions and Change of Main Business Activities,
   5. OJK Regulation No. 31/POJK.04/2015 on Disclosure of Material Information or Facts by Issuers or Public Companies, and
   6. OJK Regulation No. 29/POJK.04/2015 on Issuers and Public Companies Exempted from Reporting and Disclosure Requirements,
4. Law No. 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition, including its amendment,
5. Other specific regulations depend on the nature of the target company’s business.

During the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020-2021, the M&A transactions in Indonesia were quiet as the business actors were focusing more on how to maintain the existing business operation rather than acquiring a new one. In 2022, the M&A transactions has dwindled due to several factors such as inflation, interest rate, and the increase of capital cost. Following the positive development post the Covid-19 pandemic and the strong support by the governments, the market of M&A transactions has been slowly rising in 2023. However, it was slowly decreasing nearing the end of 2023 due to the presidential election which will held in 2024. The market tends to wait for the result of the presidential election before making a move since it will affect the government policies.

Recently, the Indonesian government has been issuing many regulations which aim to ease licensing procedures in Indonesia and attract more investors. The first one is the infamous Omnibus Law¹ that was issued in 2020 and deemed a major amendment to Indonesian laws and regulations. This seems to bring a positive impact on Indonesia’s investment progress, including the investment made through an acquisition transaction. Following the Omnibus Law, the Indonesian government issued many other regulations which also aim for the unification and legal certainty for the publics and business actors, among others Law No. 7 of 2021 on the Unification of Tax regulations and Law No. 4 of 2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector.

Footnotes:

¹ The Omnibus Law has been replaced by Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja, which has been legalized into law under Law No. 6 of 2023.

As the fintech industry getting more popular in recent years, M&A transactions was revolving around this sector. However, due to the winter tech that affects the tech companies and start up all over the world, there is less M&A transactions involving tech companies in 2023. The business players tend to move back to the old fashion business, especially with the new hype of electric vehicles. Thus, the renewables and non-renewables energy were quite popular in 2023.

In the peer-to-peer lending sector (which were also a popular business pre-Covid 19), the Financial Service Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan / OJK) has issued Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022 Tahun 2022 on IT-Based Co-Financing Service (“POJK 10/2022”), which stipulates the peer-to-peer lending companies’ paid-up capital must be minimum of IDR 25 billion with maximum foreign investment of 85% of the Company’s paid up capital. This new regulation creates another checklist for the investor or new player to conduct any M&A over peer-to-peer lending companies. Further, POJK 10/2022 stipulates that any change of ownership and merger of a peer-to-peer lending company must first obtain approval from the OJK. However, at the same time, this POJK 10/2022 provides lock up period within 3 (three) years after the issuance of peer-to-peer lending companies license from OJK, which prohibit any changes of shareholding composition that may cause new shareholder(s) and/or change of controlling shareholder. This clause might create another hold in conducting M&A transaction to follow such lock up period.

One of the key factors would be Indonesia’s presidential election which will be held in 2024. Based on the General Election Commission Regulation No. 3 of 2022 on Stages and Schedule for Holding the 2024 General Election, the presidential election will take place early 2024 and the process of the election would end at the latest by around October 2024. Investors usually will be more cautious during the presidential election term as they are afraid that the new President-elect does not share the same political view as the incumbent, resulting in further changes to the laws and regulations in Indonesia which may impact their investment. Therefore, the investors tend to wait for the presidential election process to end before conducting large corporate actions.

On the positive side, the government have issued several policies that may positively contribute to the M&A activities in Indonesia. Among others is the new policies for banking sectors and insurance sectors:

1. Banking Sector

The OJK in 2020 issued Regulation No. 12/POJK.03/2020 on Consolidation of Commercial Banks, which sets out that banks must fulfil the minimum core capital (modal inti) requirement of IDR 3 trillion. Failure to fulfil such capitalization requirements under the regulation may result in a bank having to conduct M&A transactions with other banks to fulfil the capitalization requirements.

Other new regulation in the financial sector is Law No. 4 of 2023 on Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (“Law No. 4/2023”). Law No. 4/2023 provide policies and regulations which may influence certain businesses in the financial sector to conduct M&A. Among others, is by providing authority to OJK to deliver a written order to financial service agencies to conduct M&A. A concrete example provided under Law No. 4/2023, is the OJK’s authority to requests Conventional or Syariah Principle Banks to conduct mergers with other Conventional or Syariah Banks, if it is deemed to be having difficulties which threatens its business continuity.

Another related regulation is OJK Regulation No. 12 of 2023 on Syariah Business Unit (“POJK 12/2023”) that was issued in July 2023. Generally, POJK 12/2023 was issued to encourage syariah business unit to carry out various developments and adjustment in business procedures to strengthen institutional aspects and to improve the national syariah banking industry. A concrete example is that Conventional Banks that: (i) owned syariah business unit with assets exceeding 50% of the total asset of the Conventional Banks or (ii) if the syariah business unit’s assets have exceed Rp. 50,000,000,000,000 (fifty trillion Rupiah), is required to conduct a spin-off to the syariah business unit.

Lastly, in the year of 2022, the OJK issued Regulation No. 22 of 2022 on Equity Investments by Commercial Banks (“POJK No. 22/2022”) which promotes new norm which permitted commercial bank to invest in other companies in the financial technology sector. Previously, commercial banks were merely allowed to invest in certain range of sectors, namely financial institution (e.g. banks, venture capital, securities). The investment by the bank may be conducted either directly or indirectly through the stock market. Moreover, under POJK No. 22/2022 it is stipulated that the investments by the bank shall be long term investment. With regards to this new norm, this leads into the M&A transaction plan over financial technology companies by the commercial banks. This provides another opportunity for other types of M&A transactions in the next 2 years over the financial technology sector. We can see that in the future both Commercial Banks and financial technology will somehow meet and merge their business core to serve more customers with a touch of technology.

2. Insurance Sector

Lastly, in December 2023, OJK issued OJK Regulation No. 23 of 2023 on Business and Institutional Licensing of Insurance Companies, Sharia Insurance Companies, Re-insurance Companies and – Sharia Reinsurance Companies, annulling the OJK Regulation No 67/POJK.05/2016.

The most recent regulation sets out an increase in the minimum equity as follows:

• Conventional Insurance (an increase from IDR 150 billion to IDR 1 trillion);
• Syariah Insurance (an increase from IDR 100 billion to IDR 500 billion);
• Conventional Re-insurance (an increase from IDR 300 billion to IDR 2 trillion); and
• Syariah Reinsurance (an increase from IDR 175 billion to IDR 1 trillion).

Furthermore, OJK also issued three new regulations in relation to insurance business:

• Firstly, the OJK Regulation No. 24 year 2023 on Business and Institutional Licensing for Insurance Broker Companies, Reinsurance Broker Companies, and Insurance Loss Appraisal Companies, requires adjustments in the Company other than increasing the minimum paid-up capital. The Regulation contains revisions to improve the reporting mechanism and identification of foreign ownership and requires separation of main functions in the organizational structure.
• Second, OJK Regulation No. 27 year 2023 on Implementation of Pension Fund Business further regulates investments of pension funds through additional requirements on competency of pension fund administrators and placement of investments that tend to be high risk.
• Lastly, OJK Regulation No. 20 year 2023 on Insurance Products Linked to Sharia Credit or Financing and Sharia Suretyship or Suretyship Products, has regulated more optimal mitigation mechanism on risk exposure borne by insurance companies.

The significant increase of minimum paid-up capital would require a significant capital injection, resulting in insurance companies to more likely to conduct a merger or acquisition to collectively fulfil the requirement.

Control over a publicly listed company can be gained by either acquiring existing shares or subscribing to new shares by purchasing offered rights.

Shares acquisition in a publicly traded company will trigger a mandatory tender offer if there is a change of control. The regulation defines control as (i) having more than 50% of the issued shares in the company with voting rights, or (ii) having less than 50% of shares in the company but having the power to determine (either directly or indirectly) the management or policies of the company.

The POJK 9/2018 elaborates certain conditions in which the shares control will not trigger a mandatory tender offer, among others: (i) the acquisition resulted from marriage or inheritance; (ii) the acquisition resulted from court decision that are final and binding; (iii) the acquisition resulted from the private placement in order to improve the financial position of the target company as regulated under the relevant OJK regulation; (iv) the acquisition results from a rights issue, where the shareholders obtain shares by exercising their rights in proportion to their shareholding, (v) the acquisition results from an increase of capital without pre-emptive rights in the context of debt restructuring where the public company is in financial distress.

For private target companies, the publicly available information would be limited to (i) the corporate information of the company which can be obtained from the Minister of Law and Human Rights’ system and (ii) the litigation information of the target, if any, as published in the online registers of the courts having jurisdiction over the target’s domicile (the Case Search Information System or locally known as Surat Informasi Penelusuran Perkara). However, there are a few downsides to using this publicly available information as there is a possibility that the information contained on the website is not updated.

For listed target companies, in addition to the general information that is available as stipulated above, the following information/documents are also available for the public:

• the appointment of a corporate secretary,
• allocations of securities,
• any disclosure that must be announced to the public,
• public disclosures concerning certain shareholders,
• reports concerning conflict of interest transactions,
• report concerning material transactions,
• announcement and disclosure of bonus shares,
• resolution of the general meeting of the shareholders,
• audited financial statement and annual report of the target,

Investors usually carry out due diligence on legal, finance, and tax matters of the target company for M&A transactions. Some technical due diligence might be required if the target company involves certain specific activities. For example, if the target company involves in the IT industry, the investors may require additional due diligence on the IT system and personal data protection policy of the target company.

For the legal due diligence in Indonesian M&A transactions, full-blown due diligence covering corporate documents, licenses, manpower, material agreements, assets, insurance, environmental compliance, litigation and court searches is usually required.

The organs of an Indonesian limited liability company consist of (i) a general meeting of shareholders, (ii) the board of directors, and (iii) the board of commissioners. The general meeting of shareholders is the highest organ in which the Indonesian Company Law regulates that certain actions of the company must be approved by the general meeting of shareholders. Some of the matters that require approval from the general meeting of the shareholders, according to the Indonesian Company Law are:

• Shares buyback,
• Amendment of the company’s authorized and issued capital,
• Amendment of the company’s articles of association,
• Merger, consolidation, acquisition, division (spin-off),
• Filing for the company’s bankruptcy,
• Extension of the company’s duration,
• Dissolution, and
• Transfer or encumber the company’s assets having a value of more than 50% of the total asset of the company.

On the other hand, the board of directors and the board of commissioners are part of the management of the company. The Indonesian Company Law regulates a two-tier management system consisting of the Board of Directors (BOD) and the Board of Commissioners (BOC). The BOD is fully responsible for the management of the company, having the authority to represent the company and to perform the day-to-day management of the company. The BOC is mandated to supervise the BOD in performing its duty and to provide advice to the BOD.

See the elaboration in question number 8. In general, the directors of the company are responsible for the operation of the target company. As for the controlling shareholders, their vote would be required to fulfill the quorum requirement for certain actions that need to be determined by the general meeting of shareholders, as required under the Indonesian Company Law.

Specific to an M&A transaction, the Indonesian Company law protects the rights of the employees and the minority shareholders. For employees, Indonesian Company Law requires the company to inform the employees before the occurrence of an M&A transaction. The purpose is to ensure that the employees can request termination (with payment of their severance payment package) if they do not agree to work under the new management following the M&A transaction.

As for the minority shareholders, the Indonesian Company Law specifically regulates that the company must consider the interest of a minority shareholder in undertaking M&A transactions. The Indonesian Company Law even regulates that the company is required to purchase the shares of dissenting minority shareholders in an M&A transaction.

It is common for M&A transactions in Indonesia to have a conditionality clause. If the target company’s activities require approval from a specific government institution for the completion of the M&A transaction (for example banks, fintech companies, and finance companies would need the OJK’s approval), the approval would be stated as the condition for completion. Other than that, the parties usually include the required target company’s shareholders’ approval, the result of their negotiation and the due diligence issues as the conditions for the completion of the transaction.

Further, certain approval from stakeholders such as lender and main business partners may also be relevant. Due to this reason, under the Indonesian Company Law, the company which conducts M&A must make an announcement in newspaper, both prior and post M&A by the virtue of notifying stakeholders. Particular for certain industries or pre-Initial Public Offering (IPO) target which are subject to lock up, the parties may consider certain transition form of instrument before the entire steps of transaction could be completed.

As such, the parties to the M&A transactions usually execute the so-called conditional shares sale and purchase agreement. Under the so-called conditional shares sale and purchase agreement, various indemnities clauses and also representations and warranties will have major impact towards the transaction. Further in various events, if the previous shareholders sell 100% of their shares, they will also be requested to various undertaking which hold them to conduct the same business for certain period of times and to solicit certain members of key persons.

Further, in the event that the M&A will result the joint venture between the existing shareholder and the new shareholder/investor, the investor usually will stipulate provision regarding lock-up period for the founder of the company as an addition obligation towards the various matters of indemnities clauses. After the completion, they will execute a deed of restatement of shareholders (in which approving the acquisition) and the deed of acquisition before the notary, as required by Indonesian Company Law. For the acquisition, the company will need to obtain approval of Ministry of Law and Human Rights or Receipt of Notification. Later, the company will also conduct post-acquisition announcement within 30 days as of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Receipt of Notification / Approval (to the extent applicable).

It would be up to the negotiation between the parties. The common effort to secure deal exclusivity in Indonesia is to insert exclusivity and break-up clauses in the agreement. The exclusivity clause would clearly regulate that the sellers are prohibited to hold any negotiation with other parties concerning the acquisition of the target company starting from the signing of the term sheet up to a certain deadline as agreed between the parties. To ensure that the sellers would abide by the exclusivity clause, the acquirer sometimes also adds a break-up clause in the agreement, which requires the sellers to pay for certain fees if they decide to not pursue the transactions after the signing of the term sheet or the conditional shares sale and purchase agreement.

See the response in question 12 concerning the break-up clause in the agreement.

Cash is the most common consideration used between the parties in an M&A transaction in Indonesia. Aside from cash, the consideration may also be in the form of new shares issued by the acquirer for the seller as method of the payment or the combination of cash and new shares. In practice, M&A transactions in Indonesia, the acquirer may also give earn out to provides protection for both parties due to the uncertainty of any potential future but not proven yet upside affecting the agreed valuation.

For a general acquisition transaction, the Indonesian Company Law requires the company to announce the acquisition plan in a daily newspaper 30-day before the shareholders approve the transaction (either via a general meeting of shareholders or a circular resolution of shareholders). If the target company is a publicly listed company, additional public disclosure would be required. For an acquisition of listed companies transaction that requires a Mandatory Tender Offer (MTO), an announcement of the MTO plan must be made in: (i) at least one daily newspaper or (ii) the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) website, within two business days after obtaining an announcement approval from the OJK. On the other hand, for a Voluntary Tender Offer (VTO) transaction, the offeror must submit a VTO statement to the OJK and publish it in at least two daily newspapers on the same day as the submission day to the OJK.

For a non-acquisition transaction (acquiring a minority stake in a target company), no mandatory public disclosure is required if the target is a private company. On the other hand, if the target company is a publicly listed company, public disclosure should be made if the acquisition involves at least 5% shares in the company. OJK Regulation No. 11/POJK.04/2017 on Reports of Ownership or any Changes to the Ownership of Shares in Public requires any party to report to the OJK upon the changes of ownership for the minimum of 5% or more paid-up shares in the public company, either directly or indirectly.

If the target is a private company, there is no requirement to make a public disclosure concerning the negotiation between the parties. On the other hand, if the target is a publicly listed company, the bidder may (but is not obliged) to make a public disclosure that it is in a negotiation with the seller. The announcement can be made in a national newspaper or on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) website. If the bidder decides to make the announcement, it must:

1. also submit the announcement to (i) the target company, (ii) OJK, and (iii) the stock exchange where the target company is listed on the same day as the announcement date², and
2. update the information concerning the negotiation via the national newspaper or the stock exchange’s website.

In the event that the bidder decides to not announce the negotiation, the regulation requires all parties to keep the confidentiality of the negotiation process.

One of the bidder’s reasoning to make a public disclosure concerning the negotiation is if it anticipates an increase in the price of the target’s shares which may affect the minimum consideration price of the MTO (see further elaboration in Question number 18). If an announcement is made, the calculation formulas to determine the minimum price of MTO would kick in once the negotiation is announced.

Footnote

² The submission to the stock exchange is not required if the announcement is made on the stock exchange’s website

The laws do not set a hard deadline for the period of negotiations or due diligence between the parties. Therefore, it would be up to the commercial discussion and agreement between the parties.

For both a private target company and a public target company, the parties are generally free to decide the price of the transaction due to the freedom of contract principle that is adopted by Indonesian law.

However, if the target company is a publicly listed company, an MTO obligation is required to be conducted by the new controlling shareholder. The regulations set certain formulas to determine the consideration price in an MTO. As the calculation formula would vary, usually the price of the MTO would depend on: (i) the average price of the highest daily trading price on the Indonesian Stock Exchange within a period of last 90 days³ (“Average Trading Price”); or (ii) the price of the acquisition.

The bidder is required to make an MTO with the highest price among the Average Trading Price of the price of the acquisition. For example, if the Average Trading Price of PT A Tbk is Rp. 1,000, and the price of the acquisition if Rp. 2,000, the bidder is required to conduct an MTO for PT A Tbk at Rp. 2,000 since the price of the acquisition is higher than the Average Trading Price. Vise versa, if the Average Trading Price of PT A Tbk is Rp. 2,000, and the price of the acquisition is Rp. 1,000, the bidder is required to conduct an MTO for PT A Tbk at Rp. 2,000 since the Average Trading Price is higher than the price of the acquisition.

Footnote:

³ There are 4 situations to calculate the start of the 90 days period. The common situation is the 90 days period before the public disclosure regarding the negotiation, or 90 days period before the announcement of acquisition. To further illustrate the calculation of the 90 days period is elaborated below.

If the bidder decided to make a public disclosure regarding its negotiation with the seller, the 90 days period will be counted before the public disclosure regarding the negotiation. However, if the bidder decided not to make any disclosure regarding the negotiation, the 90 days period will be counted before the announcement of acquisition.

It is not common for the target companies to provide financial assistance to the acquirer in purchasing shares in the company as this would not be in the interest of the company. It can also be challenged that the financing is deemed as furtherance of the objects of the company (or the Ultra Vires Doctrine) considering that the target company would not obtain any commercial benefit from the transaction. However, it is possible that certain target companies may provide financial assistance for the acquirer with the note that the financial assistance shall be structured properly by the target companies.

Indonesian law acknowledges the concept of freedom of contract. Under the freedom of contract principle, parties are free to choose the governing law applicable to their contracts – they may choose whichever law they prefer as long as there is a connection point between the selected law with the matter and the subject of the contract. If the parties to the transaction are all Indonesian parties, they usually choose Indonesian law as the governing law. However, if there are foreign parties, the foreign parties usually choose either Singapore Law or English Law to be used as the governing law of the contract.

If the buyer (the bidder) decides to make public disclosure concerning the negotiation process for the purchase of shares in a publicly listed company (as referred to in Question 16), it must provide among others the following information:

1. Name of the target company to be acquired;
2. The estimated number of shares to be acquired,
3. Its identity (e.g., name, address, contact number, business activities),
4. The number of existing shares owned by the bidder in the target company, (if any),
5. The purposes of the acquisition and the acquisition plan,
6. The cooperation plan, agreement, or decision between the Organized Group Parties if the acquisition is carried out by the Organized Group Parties,
7. The means and process of the negotiation, and
8. The negotiation material.

If the transfer of shares would result in an acquisition transaction, the transfer of shares agreement must be made in a notarial deed, as regulated under the Indonesian Company Law. Otherwise, a privately executed agreement would be sufficient to govern the transaction between the parties.

The parties to the transaction should also observe and comply with the Indonesian Language Law requirement which requires the Indonesian version of an agreement made with Indonesian parties. The Indonesian Language Law requirement further regulates that if the agreement is made between Indonesian parties, the agreement must be made in the Indonesian language. Otherwise, if there is a foreign party to the agreement, the agreement can be signed in a foreign language and Indonesian language (with the foreign language as the governing language).

Unlike other countries which require stamp duty charges for an acquisition transaction, Indonesian law does not require such charges. Indonesian law only requires the party to affix a duty stamp sticker (for IDR 10,000,-) on the signatory page of the transfer agreement. In addition to this, the selling shareholders would be subject to income tax regulation should there is any profit being made as a result of the acquisition transaction.

For the listed shares of a public company, transfer of shares is effectively completed upon the crossing mechanism in the stock exchange via the appointed securities companies. The transferred shares would then be recorded in the Indonesia Central Securities Depository (Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia / KSEI).

No, hostile acquisition is not formally recognized under Indonesian law.

Generally, Indonesian Company Law provides certain level of protective procedures for acquisition. Indonesian Company Law requires that the quorum to conduct a general meeting of shareholders to approve (i) a merger must be at least ¾; and (ii) acquisition must be at least ¾, of the votes casted in the meeting. If general meeting of shareholders will convey its decision through a circular resolution, 100% of the shareholders must provide their approval to the acquisition. This criteria creates certain level of protection over the minority shareholders of the Indonesian Company.

Indonesian law also obliges the company which will undergo acquisition to conduct announcements in newspapers, prior and after the acquisition process, to ensure that all related parties (including shareholders, creditor, and employee) to be aware of the acquisition and may deliver any objections if the acquisition is deemed to cause harm to their interests.

Although hostile acquisition is not recognized under Indonesian law, there are other method which may resemble hostile acquisition, namely VTO method for public listed companies.

VTO method in Indonesia is govern under POJK 54/2015, where VTO is defined as a voluntary offer by a party to acquire equity securities issued by the target company by the way of purchasing or by exchanging with other securities through mass media. To conduct voluntary tender offer, the acquirer shall submit the voluntary tender offer statement to the stock exchange, target company, and other party which has announced voluntary tender offer (if any). The voluntary tender offer in Indonesia may be conducted within or outside stock exchange.

Generally, the directors would simply implement his / her obligations under the company law where any director shall uphold fiduciary duty and protect the best interest of the Company when the hostile approach appears. It is not clear on whether these principles should be interpreted in what extent to prevent the hostile takeover. However, Director shall take into account various issues (e.g. employees, lenders, etc) for any acquisition in any communication and discussion during the hostile process.

See the response in question 5 concerning the trigger of a mandatory tender offer in a publicly listed company.

In addition to the general rights of a shareholder as regulated by the Indonesian Company Law, i.e., the rights of casting votes and receiving dividends (or liquidation proceeds of the company), the Indonesian Company Law also provides additional rights to the minority shareholders, among others:

1. The right to stop “detrimental actions” – the Indonesian Company Law regulates that any shareholders have the right to file a lawsuit against the company to the court for any damage caused by the acts of the company which is considered to be unfair and unreasonable resulting from any decisions of the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors and/or the Commissioners,
2. The right to sell its shares in a dissenting opinion in a General Meeting of Shareholders – the Indonesian Company Law states that if a shareholder does not approve the actions of the company in (i) amending the articles of association, (ii) transfer or encumbrance of the assets of the company or (iii) merger, consolidation, acquisition or division of the company, such shareholder may require the company to purchase its/his/her shares “at a reasonable price”,
3. The right to call for a shareholders’ meeting – at the request of one or more shareholders who together represent at least 1/10 of the total number of issued shares with valid voting rights (or any smaller amount as provided for in the articles of association), a general meeting of shareholders must be conducted,
4. The right to commence court proceedings against Directors or Commissioners – the Indonesian Company Law regulates that shareholder(s) representing at least 1/10 of the total number of issued shares with valid voting rights may, on behalf of the company, file a lawsuit to the district court against a member of the Board of Directors and/or the Board of Commissioners, whose fault or negligence has caused loss to the company,
5. The right to apply for a judicial inspection of a company, a director and/or a commissioner – the Indonesian Company Law states that shareholder(s) representing at least 1/10 of the total number of issued shares with valid voting rights has/have the right to request the district court to investigate the company, a Director and/or a Commissioner, if such shareholder believes that the company or the respective Director/Commissioner has committed an unlawful act that has caused losses to the company, the shareholders, or a third party,
6. The right to seek dissolution of the company – the Indonesian Company Law regulates that one or more shareholders representing at least 1/10 of the total number of issued shares with valid voting rights have the right to submit a request to the GMS to dissolve the company,
7. Pre-emptive rights – the Indonesian Company Law states that any shareholder (including minority shareholders) shall have pre-emptive rights to subscribe for newly issued shares by the company except for certain conditions⁴.

Lastly, the shareholders of a company may also regulate their rights and obligations in a shareholders’ agreement. The content and level of protection would depend on the commercial discussion between the parties. As we observed, we note that the common additional protections requested by minority shareholders in a shareholders agreement are among others (i) reserved matters – so that the majority shareholders would still require approval from the minority shareholders for certain important matters, (ii) tag-along right – so that the minority shareholders would have an option to tag along once the majority shareholders sell their shares to a third party, (iii) right of first offer or refusal – so that the minority shareholders would get an offer first once the majority shareholders decide to sell its shares in the company.

Footnote:

⁴ If the new shares are to be issued (i) to the employees, (ii) to the bondholders, or (iii) are under the scheme of reorganization/restructuring

Under a shareholders agreements, there may be a tag-along rights which may be exercised by the minority shareholders where the majority shareholder wish to sell their shares. The minority shareholders may request tag along to sell their shares altogether when the majority sells to the new party. Conversely, if there is a drag-along clause in a shareholder agreement between the selling shareholders and the minority shareholders, the selling shareholders can request the minority shareholders to sell their shares in the target company.

Apart from the above, under the Company Law, if a shareholder rejects certain major agenda in the shareholders meeting and such shareholder has shares representing 10% or more voting righs, he/she/it may request for the Company to buy back their shares at the fair market price.