39 Essex Chambers has ‘become a powerhouse for costs and litigation funding work’, with members bringing extensive expertise in related areas such as commercial and insurance litigation, construction, arbitration, and clinical negligence and personal injury. In an important case for the Fixed Costs Regime, Simon Browne KC represented the respondent before the Court of Appeal in Santiago v Odubola & Motor Insurers’ Bureau, with the ruling stating that interpreter fees can be recovered from defendants. Nicola Greaney KC acted for the proposed class representative in the first judgment from the CAT dealing with the enforceability of litigation funding post-PACCAR. In Reem Zuhri v Vardags Limited, Shaman Kapoor represented the defendant as the High Court held that Part 36 CPR does not apply to Solicitors Act assessments.
Testimonials
Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.
- 'The clerks are very responsive and helpful. Jamie Tucker in particular adds real value.'
- 'The clerks at 39 Essex are extremely helpful and attentive to clients needs. This is particularly so insofar as providing recommendations and availability of certain counsel.'
- 'The clerking team, led by Jamie Tucker, are brilliant and really user friendly. There is no hard sell but instead practical solution led responsiveness.'
- 'The clerks are superb, amenable, adaptable and responsive. They will do whatever they can to serve the client.'
- '39 Essex is an excellent chambers with real strength in depth.'
- 'The costs and litigation funding team is a leading team in the country.'
- 'They have the best and strongest costs team in the industry.'
- '39 Essex has become a powerhouse for costs and litigation funding work.'