The personal injury offering at Farrar’s Building is noted for its ‘wide range of personal injury cases', advising defendants and claimants in a broad spectrum of maximum severity injury litigation. John Meredith-Hardy’s workload includes a variety of workplace injuries, including accidents, industrial diseases, along with maritime and port work involving both chronic pain and cognitive injuries, along with psychiatric and neurological injuries requiring significant rehabilitation and assistance. Hannah Saxena is a specialist in defendant work, typically acting in claims involving complex medical causation as well as traumatic physical and psychiatric injuries as a result of traffic collisions.

Legal 500 Editorial commentary

Testimonials

Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.

  • 'Well clerked. Paul Cray is a strong director of clerking; Andy Duckett and James Shaw are both great clerks who do a super job for chambers and solicitors alike.'
  • 'Very good set of chambers with experienced counsel covering a wide range of personal injury cases.'
  • 'Good strength in depth and free training webinar programme.'
  • 'The entire clerking team is superb.'
  • 'Farrar's have good strength in depth and I find the barristers as opponents to be very able.'
  • 'Have never had an issue concerning the availability of counsel, the range of expertise is outstanding.'

Silks

Juniors

Personal injury - Leading Juniors
Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.
Lee Evans
2
Farrar’s Building
‘Excellent eye for detail, quickly absorbs information, brilliant preparatory work and a pleasure to deal with. He is approachable and excellent in conference, managing the flow and direction of discussions whilst getting to the issues.'
Andrew Wille
3
Farrar’s Building
‘He provides excellent analytical skills. He is flexible and works well as part of a team. Instructions are dealt with always before the deadline set.’
John Meredith-Hardy
3
Farrar’s Building
‘John is very thorough, organised and capable. His technical skills are superlative. He is just the person to instruct in a complex quantum dispute.’
Tom Bourne-Arton
4
Farrar’s Building
 ‘He is able to empathize with clients but at the same time anticipate and advise on difficult issues to overcome. He is reliable, efficient and has a good eye for detail.’
John Brown
5
Farrar’s Building
 ‘John is very approachable and has impressive advocacy skills. He is clear and realistic with his advise and tailors this to suit the needs of the client.’
Nick Blake
5
Farrar’s Building
‘Nick is particularly strong on his technical knowledge of the law and its strategic application for the benefit of the client.’
Stuart Brady
5
Farrar’s Building
 ‘Stuart is affable, tenacious and capable as an advocate. He is able to distil his submissions to their most effective and is pugnacious with the points he runs.’
Howard Cohen
5
Farrar’s Building
‘Howard knows his cases inside out. Attention to detail is second to none as he quickly grasps the facts of the matter. His advocacy is excellent, a very quick thinker, so very good on his feet.’
Huw Davies
5
Farrar’s Building
 ‘Huw has a keen eye for detail and is technically excellent. His all round experience sitting and as both a claimant and a defendant advocate allows him to give appropriate and considered advice to the client in question. Huw’s tactical advice is strong.’
Frederick Lyon
5
Farrar’s Building
 ‘He is timely and responsive to any queries and general advice. He goes above and beyond to make sure the case is progressed effectively.’
Simon Hughes
5
Farrar’s Building
 ‘Simon has the great balance of analyzing complex and technical issues and evidence but also has excellent client care skills.’