Stucchi Abogados’ competition and antitrust practice is a popular choice for clients from the banking, insurance, education and real estate sectors. The team is equipped to advise across the full spectrum of matters, ranging from unfair competition, merger control, anti-dumping and subsidies, and the elimination of bureaucratic barriers that restrict competition. The firm also demonstrates skill in the advisory elements of the field, such as the design and implementation of compliance programmes. The leadership trio comprises Pierino Stucchi, who concentrates on legal representation in complex judicial and administrative proceedings; José Antonio Bezada, an expert in antitrust clearance and risk prevention; and Carlos Rodas, who was recently promoted to the partnership and who focuses on issues of competition in regulated economic sectors. Associate Alexander Flores is a key member of the team.
Testimonials
Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.
‘The Stucchi team knows and understands the agility with which in-house legal teams require the information or legal evaluation that they provide us, and they do so without compromising the efficiency and depth of the analysis. Likewise, they are flexible and adapt easily to our needs.'
‘Above all, I highlight the agility, knowledge of the sense of urgency and kindness with which they always serve us. Likewise, we have a relationship founded on trust in the knowledge that the Stucchi team has, founded on the years of experience of its team, both in the public and private sectors. It is notable that throughout the years that we have been working together they have never lost the level of quality of service. Among the members we work with are Jose Antonio Bezada and Pierino Stucchi.'
Key clients
- Nestle
- Redondos
Work highlights
- Successfully advised Makro Supermayoristas on a sanctioning procedure before INDECOPI, where the client was accused of colluding with other supermarkets to set the price of turkey meat.
- Advised Football Club Alianza Lima on a consumer protection sanctioning procedure, where the client was accused of having risked the safety of stadium attendees.