North America - United States • Intellectual property

Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP

We only have limited information for this firm. Consider the following firms which have provided more information:

With standout clients such as Eli Lilly and Aston Martin in its client roster, Chicago IP boutique Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP's expansive range of capabilities include trademark, false advertising, trade dress, and unfair competition. Bradley Cohn deploys his vast experience appearing before state and federal courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office, while Thad Chaloemtiarana's wide-ranging expertise encompasses trademark infringement, dilution, and domain name cybersquatting. Seasoned litigator Jonathan Jennings frequently handles matters pertaining to trademark litigation, prosecution, and licensing for a broad array of clients and Phillip Barengolts's arsenal of skills incorporate significant court expertise, especially across various circuit courts of appeal, handling trademark, trade dress, design patent, and brand protection work. Ashly Boesche's practice comprises the full spectrum of trademark and unfair competition issues, with Jacquelyn Prom being noted for her knowledge of trademark, domain name and right of publicity.

Legal 500 Editorial commentary

Testimonials

Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.

  • ‘Their focus on IP gives them an edge in terms of knowledge and one can feel that when seeking advice or action by Pattishall. There is a good number of very knowledgeable people.'

  • 'They listen well, and that leads to perfect advice or action.’

Abbreviated data is displayed for this firm.

Key clients

  • Acer Incorporated
  • Eli Lilly and Company

Abbreviated data is displayed for this firm.

Work highlights

  • Conducted worldwide trademark searches for several potential new company names/brands for a proposed publicly-traded spin-off company of BorgWarner, Inc.
  • Advising Lincare Holdings Inc. (a subsidiary of Linde) on a case involving Lincare’s claim of service mark infringement and unfair competition over Doxo’s use of Lincare’s marks and names to offer online billing services to Lincare’s customers.

Abbreviated data is displayed for this firm.