Charities

Leading Juniors

Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.

1

Jonathan Fowles

Serle Court

‘Jonathan has a depth of expertise in charity law that is unrivalled, in addition to excellent expertise and experience in other related areas, making him an absolute go-to for charity law advice. He is technically astute and articulate, but also very commercial and pragmatic in his approach.’

2

Piers Feltham

Radcliffe Chambers

2

Matthew Mills

Radcliffe Chambers

‘Matthew is extremely knowledgeable in charity law. He is organised, efficient and meets deadlines. He expresses himself clearly and logically and is popular with clients. A rising star and will soon be silk material.’

2

Joshua Winfield

Radcliffe Chambers

‘Joshua has excellent charity law expertise, provides prompt and clear advice and is a pleasure to work with.’

3

Chris Buckley

Radcliffe Chambers

3

Maxim Cardew

Maitland Chambers

‘Maxim has considerable expertise as to both the law and Charity Commission practice, and provides clear and comprehensive advice, tailored to the client’s needs. He is personable and user friendly, and takes a highly collaborative approach when working with instructing solicitors.’

3

Justin Gau

Pump Court Chambers

3

William Hopkin

New Square Chambers

'Will provides clear and timely advice. He is prepared to give an opinion which helps to steer the case towards a conclusion rather than simply state the legal position. He is also very dedicated whilst being easy to get along with.'

3

Josh Lewison

Radcliffe Chambers

3

Ted Loveday

Maitland Chambers

‘Ted is a delight to work with, interested and engaged and very client friendly. He pulls out all the stops and goes above and beyond.’

3

Mark Ruffell

Pump Court Chambers

‘Mark’s advocacy skills played a significant role in helping the client win his case. He really went the second mile and beyond in terms of his closing submissions by working on such submissions well into the early hours of the morning on the final day of the hearing.’