Claim of Discriminatory Dismissal During Probation Successful Despite Employee’s Unsatisfactory Performance
The case of Sandra Varian v Zahra Publishing Limited ADJ-00036775 came before the Workplace Relations Commission (“WRC”) recently.
WRC Confirms Genuine Redundancy
Facts: In Edward Timmons v AB Group Packaging Ireland Limited ADJ-0030801 the Complainant alleged he had been unfairly dismissed and submitted a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977-2015 (the “Acts”).
Reinstatement Ordered Where Employer Refused Employee’s Request to Withdraw her Resignation
The case of A Social Care Worker v Social Services Charity came before WRC Adjudicator, Brian Dalton, in January 2023 under the Unfair Dismissals Acts.
Employee or Independent Contractor? WRC Provides Useful Overview of the Relevant Legal Tests
In Maurice Morgan v GK Munster Couriers Limited ADJ-00032720, the Workplace Relations Commission (“WRC”) was required to consider the employment status of the Complainant, Mr Morgan.
Claim of Discriminatory Dismissal During Probation Successful Despite Employee’s Unsatisfactory Performance
The case of Sandra Varian v Zahra Publishing Limited ADJ-00036775 came before the Workplace Relations Commission (“WRC”) recently.
WRC Finds Employee Discriminated Against in Context of Probationary Review
In the case of Ivana Cepo v Sherborough Enterprises Ltd ADJ-00035362 before the Workplace Relations Commission (“WRC”), the Complainant contended that she suffered discrimination and harassment on the basis of family and gender grounds and that she was dismissed on that basis.
Reinstatement Ordered Where Employer Refused Employee’s Request to Withdraw her Resignation
The case of A Social Care Worker v Social Services Charity came before WRC Adjudicator, Brian Dalton, in January 2023 under the Unfair Dismissals Acts.
WRC Confirms Genuine Redundancy
Facts: In Edward Timmons v AB Group Packaging Ireland Limited ADJ-0030801 the Complainant alleged he had been unfairly dismissed and submitted a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977-2015 (the “Acts”).
SINGAPORE HIGH COURT REFUSES TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD FOR BREACH OF THE RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE – CVG v CVH [2022] SGHC 249
Part 3 of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Edition) (“IAA”) deals with foreign arbitral awards and Section 31 of the IAA sets out the limited circumstances under which a foreign award may be refused enforcement by the Singapore courts.
THE “EXCLUSIVITY OF PURPOSE” REQUIREMENT IN A QUISTCLOSE TRUST – WEI HO-HUNG V LYU JUN [2022] 2 SLR 1066
It is well-established that for a Quistclose trust to arise, the plaintiff must prove that the monies were transferred to the transferee to be applied exclusively to an agreed purpose which subsequently failed.