Shoosmiths

Patents

• • Finchimica v. Bayer: Advising on a claim for patent revocation in relation to the use of alkyl carbolic acid amides as pentration promoters before the Patents Court.

• • Future Injection Technologies v. Owen Mumford: Advising on a claim for patent infringement in relation to an autoinjector before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Hycontrol v. Spirotech: Advising on a claim for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation in relation to the pressure sensors for silos before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Safeguard v. Wykamol: Advising on a claim for patent infringement in relation to waterproofing before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Seoul Semiconductor v. Everlight: Advising on a claim for patent revocation and a counterclaim for infringement in relation to light emitting diodes before the Patents Court.

• • Sony Mobile Communications International v. SSH Communications Security Corporation: Advising on a claim for patent revocation and a counterclaim for infringement in relation to all of Sony's Xperia mobile telephones and tablets and the Playstation 4 before the Patents Court.

• • Soluble Technology v. Britvic: Advising on a claim for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation in relation to the formulation of soft drinks before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Tangle Teezer v. GB Kent & Sons: Advising on a claim for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation and a declaration of non-infringement in relation to a patent for the ‘tangle teezer’ hairbrush before the Patents Court.

• • Virgin Atlantic Airways v. Zodiac Aerospace: Advising on a claim for infringement of a patent and unregistered design right (and counterclaim for revocation) in relation to an aircraft seat before the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. Co-ordinating the parallel litigation in the USA, Canada and India and the oppositions before the European Patent Office.
    Trademarks

• • Acedes v Clive Sutton: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement and passing off in relation to the trademark COBRA by the use of the sign SHELBY COBRA before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Babble v. Babl: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement and passing off in relation to the trademark BABBLE by the use of the sign BABL before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Combe v. Dr Wolff: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement in relation to the VAGISIL trademark by the use of the sign VAGISAN before the High Court and Court of Appeal.

• • easyGroup v. Easyvoyage: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement in relation to the EASY trademark by the use of the sign EASYVOYAGE before the High Court.

• • Gnaw Chocolate v. Creative Nature: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement in relation to the GNAW trademark by the use of the sign GNAWBLES before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • MAG Kitchens & Bathrooms v The Radiator & Bathroom Gallery: Advising on a claim for passing off in relation to the use of a third party brand JUST LEFROY before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • NRG v Bertermann: Advising on a cancellation action in relation to MOUNTSON before the EU Intellectual Property Office (with parallel proceedings before the German Patent & Trademark Office).

• • Professional Hair Products v. Beauty Logistics: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement in relation to the import and supply of allegedly counterfeit goods.

• • Prysmian v. BICC Components: Advising on a claim for trademark infringement in relation to the manufacture and sale of cable accessories before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • 3M v. International Applications: Advising on a criminal investigation by the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (including advising in an interview under caution) and the subsequent civil claim for trademark infringement in relation to the import and supply of allegedly counterfeit goods.
     
  • Copyright experience

• • Asiatic v Phoenox: Advising on a claim for infringement of copyright in relation to the design of a rug before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Chandler v Champion Records: Advising on a claim for a declaration regarding the ownership of recording, literary and musical copyright in recordings before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Codemasters v. Automobile Club de l’Ouest: Advising on a claim for breach of a copyright and trademark licence in relation to a computer game before the High Court.

• • Future of Work v. CandidateX: Advising on a claim for infringement of copyright and a breach of confidential information and counterclaim for breach of contract in relation to a software application for recruitment before the High Court.

• • Studio Graphene v. Frolo: Advising on a claim for infringement of copyright and counterclaim for breach of contract in relation to a social media application before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

• • Victorian Plumbing v. Buy-it Direct: Advising on a claim for copyright infringement in relation to photographs used on a website before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.
     

    Designs

• • Core Products v. vidaXL: Advising on a claim for design right infringement in relation to furniture in the mid-century modern design.
  • Exertis v. NRG: Advising on a claim for design right infringement in relation to accessories for Sonos® speakers before the High Court.
  • Hi-Tech v. AC Cars: Advising on a cancellation action in relation to registered designs for the Cobra before the EU Intellectual Property Office and UK Intellectual Property Office.
  • Shnuggle v. Munchkin: Advising on a claim for design right and registered Community design infringement in relation to a baby bath before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.