Aparna Nathan KC is a highly sought-after tax barrister. She has a high-profile litigation practice, often involving millions, sometimes billions in tax, and represents clients in all forums including the Supreme Court.
Advisory: tax planning for ultra-high net worth UK and foreign domiciliaries including complex offshore structures; Residence and Domicile/ Deemed Domicile issues; UK property CGT regime; Estate planning; GAAR; company residence and permanent establishment; EBTs; disguised remuneration.
Litigation: extensive litigation including in the Supreme Court.
APN/ PPN/ FNs and Penalties: David Beadle v HMRC ; Reid & Emblin v HMRC ; Sheiling Properties Ltd v HMRC.
TMA, CRCA: HMRC v Derry; Goldsmith v HMRC; Rogers& Shaw v HMRC; De Silva v HMRC.
Partnerships and LLPs: Walewski v HMRC; Cobalt Data Centres LLP1 and others v HMRC.
Corporation Tax: EDF Energy v HMRC; HMRC v SSE Generation; BAT v HMRC.
Ramsay Challenges: Good & Ryan v HMRC; Daarasp v HMRC; Flanaghan v HMRC; Berry v HMRC.
Judicial Review: JJ Management Consulting LLP v HMRC; Dickinson v HMRC ; Archer v HMRC.
Discovery Assessments: Good & Ryan v HMRC; Hoey v HMRC; Anderson v HMRC.
Company residence: Laerstate v HMRC; Wood v Holden.
For more information on Aparna's practice and latest case highlights, please consult her full Devereux profile.
London Bar
Aparna Nathan KC – Devereux – ‘Aparna is one of the cleverest - and nicest - tax silks: she is a joy to work with. Her knowledge and understanding of the technical requirements of tax charges and reliefs are second-to-none.’
London Bar
Aparna Nathan KC –Devereux ‘Aparna is an excellent and thorough advocate.’