Anthony Radevsky > Chambers of Guy Fetherstonhaugh KC and Stephen Jourdan KC > London, England > Barrister Profile
Falcon Chambers Offices
Falcon Chambers
FALCON COURT
LONDON
EC4Y 1AA
England
- Set Profile
- Go to...
Anthony Radevsky
Position
Barrister specialising in commercial and residential property, particularly landlord and tenant and conveyancing; property-related professional negligence; involved in a lot of enfranchisement work, reported cases include: Cadogan v McMahon [2001] 1 AC 378 (HL); 9 Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (CA) [2006] 1 WLR 1163; Boss Holdings v Grosvenor West End Properties [2008] 1 WLR 289 (HL); Howard de Walden v Aggio [2009] 1 AC 39 (HL); Prospect Estates v Grosvenor Estates [2009] 1 WLR 1313 (CA); Hosebay Ltd v Day (SC) [2012] 1 WLR 2884; Westbrook Dolphin Square v Friends Life (ChD) [2015] 1 WLR 1713; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Accordway Ltd (CA) [2017] 1 WLR 1761; Ryan v Villarosa [2019] 1 WLR 515; York House (Chelsea) Ltd v Thompson [2020] Ch. 1.
Career
Called 1978, Inner Temple; Real Estate Junior of the Year – Chambers Bar Awards 2010 and 2018, Barrister of the Year – Enfranchisement and Right to Manage Awards 2012 and Outstanding Achievement Award – Enfranchisement and Right to Manage Awards 2016.
Publications: ‘Service of Documents’ (Longman 1989); ‘Drafting Pleadings’ (Tolley 1995); ‘Hague on Leasehold Enfranchisement’ (seventh edition due 2020, Sweet & Maxwell); ‘Tenants’ Right of First Refusal’ (fourth edition due 2020, Lexis Nexis).
Memberships
Chancery Bar Association; Property Bar Association.
Education
Alleyn’s School, Dulwich; University of Southampton (1977 LLB Hons); College of Law (1978 Bar Finals).
Lawyer Rankings
London Bar > Property litigation
(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 1Anthony Radevsky –Falcon Chambers ‘Tony gives very clear and firm advice which is succinct and commercial. He will never sit on the fence or reserve opinion on something. His knowledge of the enfranchisement legislation is second to none and if he thinks that it is a bad point he will say so rather than running up unnecessary costs.’