New Park Court Chambers

newparkcourt.co.uk

Adam Birkby

Adam Birkby is a highly respected specialist in criminal, regulatory and disciplinary law. Whether being led by the pre-eminent silks on circuit, acting alone or as a leading junior, Adam is regularly instructed in some of the most serious and complex cases in the criminal, regulatory and disciplinary calendar. Adam is a CPS Level 4 prosecutor on the general crime, serious crime, counter-terrorism and rapes and other serious sexual offences lists. Having been appointed to the list of Specialist Regulatory Advocates, Adam regularly prosecutes and defends in cases involving health and safety, environmental and trading standards law. Adam has built on this success to forge his disciplinary practice, representing police officers in misconduct proceedings and inquests and representing the General Medical Council in fitness to practise proceedings. Adam is qualified to accept instructions directly from members of the public under the Bar Council Public Access scheme. He is particularly interested in direct access work relating to crime, public inquiries, professional discipline and inquests. Crime Adam has significant experience in prosecuting and defending: Homicide. Serious violence. Serious sexual offences including rape, historic child abuse, and possession of indecent images. Drugs offences including conspiracy to import and supply Class A. Firearms offences. Offences involving large-scale public disorder. Dishonesty offences including aggravated burglary and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Fraud including mortgage fraud, benefit fraud, money laundering, infringement of trademarks and the evasion of duty. Offences against public justice. Confiscation proceedings. Motoring law including death by dangerous driving. Terrorism offences, including the preparation of terrorist acts. In addition, he advises local authorities, prosecuting agencies and limited companies on a wide range of criminal law issues including the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, public interest immunity, hearsay and bad character. Adam regularly appears before the Court of Appeal. Adam has completed the advocacy and vulnerable witness training course. He also delivers training to fellow practitioners on recent changes in case law and legislation, bad character and hearsay. Regulatory In addition to general crime, Adam prosecutes and defends in regulatory cases involving health and safety enforcement, environmental health, food standards, gangmasters legislation, and trading standards. He is appointed to the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates. Prosecutes and defends in cases brought by DEFRA, the Food Standards Agency, the Gangmasters Licensing Authority, the Health and Safety Executive, the Environment Agency, Trading Standards and several local authorities. Advises and represents defendants and local authorities in relation to anti-social behaviour orders/injunctions, non-molestation orders and committals to prison. Advises and represents limited companies and company directors in public inquiries before the Traffic Commissioner in respect of breaches of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995. Professional Discipline Adam appears on behalf of the General Medical Council in fitness to practise, review and restoration hearings before the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal Service. He regularly appears before the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service on behalf of the General Medical Council for review hearings, fitness to practise hearings and restoration hearings. Police Discipline Adam is regularly instructed to represent police officers facing disciplinary allegations before misconduct hearings. He has extensive experience in representing police officers in Misconduct Hearings, Police Appeals Tribunal Hearings, Criminal Proceedings, Inquests and applications for Judicial Review. Adam also represents police officers facing disciplinary allegations of sexual assaults, corruption, dishonesty, including theft and providing false statements, improper use of force, harassment, neglect of duty, including in the context of related deaths in custody, and misuse of PNC and other confidential information held on police systems. Coronial & Public Law Represents police officers, companies, health authorities, insurers, local authorities and families of the deceased in inquests concerning deaths in custody and through the use of force by police officers, road traffic accidents, drownings and corporate manslaughter. Experience of drafting grounds for judicial review and has appeared in the High Court to challenge coronial decisions. Thorough knowledge of inquest procedure and coronial law and of the Administrative Court procedure and public law relating to inquests. Represented a custody sergeant in relation to the death of a vulnerable woman in custody. Required a thorough knowledge of the policies and procedures applicable to the custody suite. Represented a police constable in relation to the death of a suspect that he had arrested and used physical force in order to detain. Represented a builder who permitted a sub-contractor to carry out tasks at height without any training or safety equipment. Required a through knowledge of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Prison Law Advises and represents prisoners in adjudication hearings, parole board hearings (including “lifer” hearings and recalls on licence), claims for false imprisonment and personal injury. Advises and represents Probation Services and prison authorities in claims for false imprisonment and negligence. Public Law Advises and represents claimants in judicial review proceedings arising from inquests, actions against the police and prison law. Represents claimants in actions against the police for assault, false imprisonment and wrongful arrest.

Alistair MacDonald KC

Alistair Macdonald KC prosecutes and defends in the most serious crime cases, including murder and serious drugs offences. His particular strength is in criminal offences involving complex medical or scientific issues, infant deaths and complex arson cases. Regulatory crime and fraud are also his strengths and he is able to get to the crux of a case extremely quickly and instils confidence in clients like few others. Medical & Scientific Experience 1978-1982: Research Assistant, Liver Unit, King’s College Hospital Medical School. Work on the origin of liver disease associated with cystic fibrosis. Work on the immunology of liver transplantation. 1976-1978: Toxicologist Department of Forensic Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital Medical School. 1975: Institute of Animal Physiology, Cambridge. Original research on pig lymphocytes (paper published). 1974: Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge. Work on the analysis of human foodstuffs to detect organophosphate pesticide residues. Alistair’s happy to accept instructions electronically and have substantial experience of electronic presentation of the evidence. Alistair is committed to developing innovative ways of presenting evidence, particularly so as to render material more user friendly for the jury. He has worked with police and private audio-visual units so as to produce hard hitting and effective ways of making evidence stick in the minds of the jury. Homicide R v Martin Vernarsky (2012) - Defended allegation that the defendant, who was a Czech national, had murdered his Hungarian girl friend by strangulation. The defendant was acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter. R v Janine Birch (2012). Defended in murder in which the defendant was alleged to have stabbed victim and then trampled over his body causing broken ribs. She had then spat on him and verbally abused him. The defendant was acquitted of murder and convicted of unlawful act manslaughter. Having been sentenced, the judge, after a substantial delay, brought the defendant back to re-sentence her on the basis that he had given her excessive credit for her pre-trial offer of manslaughter. After reading extensive skeleton argument reviewing all authorities on this subject, judge left sentence unaltered. R v Alan Cooper (2011). Defended in one of first cases to raise defence of abnormality of mental functioning. The defendant had killed his 14 year old nephew in full view of the defendant’s mother. Drugs R v Qureshi (2009). Prosecuted defendant for importation of very large quantities of Class A and B drugs from Belgium. The defendant had absconded when other defendants had been tried. Difficult case given that in original trial, some defendants had been convicted and one acquitted. The defendant was convicted. R v Ververgaert & Others (2009). Prosecuted the defendant for importation of industrial quantities of Class A drugs from Holland. Defendant convicted. Sexual Offences R v N (2011). Defending male nurse charged with sexual assault on patients emerging from anaesthesia. Multiple counts. Involves complex issues about the psycho-pharmaceutical effects of anaesthetic agents. Acquitted on some counts, convicted on others. Case before Court of Appeal for determination of cross-admissibility of counts where a recognised medical phenomenon (anaesthetic-induced hallucination) may explain complainants’ experiences. R v R (2006). Defended male nurse charged with raping 80-year-old patient terminally ill with brain tumour. Defendant acquitted. Kidnapping R v Ting Fu Guo (2011). Defended in case in which a Chinese shipping millionaire’s son was held captive and assaulted for five days. He was tortured in the course of his abduction. A ransom demand of £1.27m ($2m) was made. R v Miah & Liban Mohammed. Prosecuted defendants for kidnapping and blackmail in relation to the taking of a 14-year-old boy and threats to his parents that the kidnappers would chop his arms, legs and head off should their ransom demands not be satisfied. Defendants convicted and sentenced to terms of custody of 17 and 11 years. Fraud R v RD (2012). Defended company director on charges of multi-million pound fraudulent trading in relation to his car hire business. Case into fifth week when trial had to be aborted because of illness of the defendant. Intensely complex case involving minute detail of hire purchase transactions in London and the North-West. R v PSK (2011). The defendant was bank employee alleged to have been insider assisting other defendant to commit large-scale fraud on bank. The defendant acquitted. Co-accused convicted. R v Mirzabegi (2008). Prosecuted £2.5m fraud on VOSA. 28,000 MOT certificates were issued fraudulently. Became involved in case after irregularities at first trial. Defendants convicted. Judicial Review & Inquests R (on the application of Adeo Fernando Francisquini) v Legal Services Commission. Challenge of decision of LSC to refuse inquest funding for bereaved father and husband whose relatives had died in the fire at Lakenal House in London.Represented family of deceased before Bedfordshire Coroner in circumstances in which allegation was that police had acted negligently in dealing with the deceased shortly before his death leading to his murder by an intruder to his house.

Amber Walker

Amber Walker deals with a range of matters across the Criminal and Regulatory disciplines. She is known for her ability to engage, reassure and quickly build a rapport, and is often instructed to represent vulnerable clients. Crime Amber appears for both the Prosecution and Defence in an range of matters, with particular emphasis upon cases involving violence, child neglect, dishonesty, sexual offences and those relating to drugs. Her work in this area has also included Contempt of Court cases where there is a crossover with other areas of law. Regulatory Amber has a wide-ranging background in Regulatory law, having specialised in such matters during a period of time as a solicitor, which included numerous complex and document-heavy cases. Her work in this area covers an array of matters including those relating to Licensing, Trading Standards cases and Health and Safety matters. Amber also has extensive experience in cases relating to Animal Welfare. As a keen equestrian, Amber has a particular focus upon equine matters in this area. She has regularly assisted in cases where the Disclosure and Barring Service has said that it is ‘Minded to Bar,’ advising and drafting representations. This has included work for clients in the care and voluntary sectors. Inquests & Inquiries Amber accepts instructions to advise and represent in this area to represent both core participants and interested parties. Amber has a growing practice in environmental cases and is keen to accept further instructions in this area.

Amy Levitt

Amy Levitt regularly undertakes instructions in complex public and private law family proceedings. Amy has been a member of chambers since April 2017, after successfully completing her pupillage under the supervision of Nicholas De La Poer KC. Prior to joining Chambers, Amy graduated with a first class honours from the University of Sheffield in 2014. She also received a distinction in spoken German and studied German Law at the Universität Trier. Crime Amy regularly appears in the Crown Courts on behalf of both the defence and Crown Prosecution Service. Amy has conducted a numerous trials and sentencing hearings including matters of violence, sexual assault, theft, harassment and various road traffic offences. Amy has experience of dealing with cases involving young and vulnerable victims. Family Amy has experience of representing the Local Authority at case management and final hearings, as well as representing Respondents and Children’s Guardians in contested final hearings. Amy is regularly instructed in a range of private law proceedings under the Children Act 1989, representing both Applicants and Respondents. Amy has represented parents in fact-finding hearings and final hearings where serious allegations such as sexual abuse and violence have been made. Amy regularly undertakes instructions in complex and lengthy fact-finding hearings. Civil & Commercial Amy has appeared in multiple road traffic trials for both claimants and defendants. Amy also composes advices in relation to road traffic accidents and has experience of stage 3 hearings. Amy also has experience of TOLATA claims, in one case securing a declaration of a common intention constructive trust and of a 100% beneficial interest in relation to the concerned property.

Andrew Espley

Andrew Espley both defends and prosecutes serious criminal cases. Andrew has appeared on both sides in five attempted murders over two years. He has also led for the Crown in a five week two handed murder. His work includes complicated fraud cases, allegations of grave sexual misconduct and large-scale drugs conspiracies. He is increasingly sought after as leading counsel both defending and prosecuting. Crime R v W- CPS historic child rape. R v O - Defence sexual assault. R v Rioch - CPS drugs supply. R v Brugmans - Defence sentence. D caught on yacht with 1,237 kilos of cocaine. R v Bristow - CPS attempted murder. R v Knight & Others Defence murder (led by Richard Barraclough KC).

Ashleigh Metcalfe

Ashleigh Metcalfe has developed a strong criminal law practice that belies her level of Call. Crime Having been appointed as a Grade 4 prosecutor at 7 years full practice, she is routinely instructed on behalf of the prosecution in complex and multi-handed cases across the full spectrum of criminal law. She acts as junior – either leading or led – as well as alone. Her practice over recent years has involved the prosecution of wide-ranging Operation cases involving, but not limited to offences such as murder, organised crime, serious violence and drugs. Ashleigh has recently been instructed to act as prosecution Junior in a Counter-Terrorism trial lasting six weeks at Leeds Crown Court. When defending, she is routinely instructed to represent clients charged with serious allegations including matters of sexual and violent offending. She is accustomed to dealing with young and vulnerable clients having cross-examined child witnesses as young as five-years-old. Ashleigh is known on Circuit as being a barrister who is meticulous in her preparation and presentation of cases. Whilst being a confident and articulate advocate, she prides herself on her approachability for both lay and professional clients, maintaining her down-to-earth attitude when giving sound legal advice. Regulatory In 2019, Ashleigh was successful in her application to join the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates at List C allowing her to prosecute for bodies such as the Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Care Quality Commission. Ashleigh has been regularly instructed in licensing hearings in relation to the revocation of private hire and Hackney taxi licences in both the Magistrates and Crown Court. Ashleigh has been instructed by the Environment Agency to appear in the Magistrates’ Court. The hearings commonly related to rod licencing and relevant byelaws and rules, including cross-examination of defendants on their history of compliance with byelaws and rules and whether they had at the time of the offence the appropriate licences to fish. Ashleigh has also been instructed by the Environment Agency to prosecute contested hearings in relation to offences under The Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Ashley Tucker

Ashley Tucker is a civil practitioner with a particular preference for Wills, Probate and Property but still retains an interest in Commercial Law, the Court of Protection and Coronal Law. From time to time though, just to freshen things up he takes on something a little different, such as a criminal prosecution of a landlord in respect of an HMO. Wills, Trusts & Probate Ashley has a particular interest in the construction, effect and validity of Wills, including mental competence, fraud and undue influence, advising and litigating on the conduct of the administration of estates by personal representatives, including challenging grants of probate, challenging the conduct of the administration by the personal representative, applications under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and Donatio Mortis Causa. He has been called upon to advise on trusts, in particular in relation to the negligent conveyancing of property interests, constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel. Major v White - The witnesses to a Will who had both at first agreed that they had witnessed the Will subsequently retracted that agreement. Both were found on the evidence to have witnessed the Will. Landlord & Tenant Ashley has particular experience relating to commercial premises, advising on a variety of aspects in relation to leases, licences and tenancy matters. He has also undertaken the drafting of commercial leases and notices and litigation. Chancery Ashley undertakes advisory and advocacy in all types of property matters, including boundary disputes, rights of way, adverse possession, trespass, nuisance and claims relating to land and commons registration. Commercial Able to bring an acquired knowledge of commercial practices into consideration when instructed in commercial and company matters, Ashley acts for Claimants and Defendants in litigation in a typical range of commercial claims. In addition, he has drafted memoranda and articles of association and amendments to memoranda and articles of association for company agents as well as for companies, and has drafted and advised on commercial contracts. He has also appeared on behalf of erring director’s disqualification proceedings by the DTI. Professional Liability Ashley’s experience in professional liability is particularly geared towards claims made against Solicitors, Accountants and Surveyors in respect of conveyancing transactions, will drafting, estate planning and insolvency. He has also advised on claims made in relation to conveyancing and local authority advice relating to enquiries touching and concerning land. Court of Protection Recent Court appearances before the Court of Protection include Re SM 2021 a challenge to a deprivation of liberty order, Re OB 2023 a determination as to best interests as to residence and Re APZ 2023 a determination as to best interests as to residence. Regulatory & Coronal Law Ashley has, also, from time to time taken on advocacy at Inquests and, more exceptionally, has taken on criminal matters with a regulatory theme. In the matter of Jenny Bryant. Acting on behalf of a care home manager in respect of the death of a care home resident as a result of an assault by another resident. In the matter of Garry Baird. Acting on behalf of a member of nursing staff in respect of a death by suicide by someone who had previously been taken to hospital by the Police due to concerns for the person’s health. Scarborough Borough Council v Fixter. Prosecuting a landlord for multiple breaches of provisions of the Housing Act 2004 regulation of property in multiple residential occupation.

Ben Campbell

Ben Campbell has developed a significant practice with a focus on crime and regulatory work. A CPS Level 4 Prosecutor, Ben both defends and prosecutes work of all levels, and has been instructed in a number of wide-ranging Operations. Ben has a pragmatic approach, and enjoys strong working relationships with both lay and professional clients. Crime Ben undertakes prosecution and defence work in equal measure at all levels throughout the criminal jurisdiction, having appeared at Youth, Magistrates’ and Crown Courts, as well as the Court of Appeal. Recently secured a conviction in a difficult and sensitive case involving threats to kill made in a domestic context. Secured the acquittal, after a trial, of a tour operator driver accused of dangerous driving. Instructed in a number of cases involving the non-payment of substantial excise duty on cigarettes. Regular work, both prosecuting and defending involving non-fatal offences against the person, predominantly offences of affray and assaults occasioning actual and grievous bodily harm. Personal Injury Ben works both in representing and advising parties in personal injury work. He is predominantly instructed in relation to road traffic accidents but also, with increasing frequency, in employer’s and occupier’s liability cases. He has experience in cases involving multiple vehicles, allegations of staged accidents, and cases involving credit hire issues. Regular instructions in Infant Approval cases. Disposal hearings. Personal injuries following road traffic accidents, often also involving damage to vehicles and credit hire charges. Has been instructed in relation to allegedly fraudulent road traffic collisions. Has successfully represented Claimants on Appeal against decisions of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. Ben has secured significant awards in this capacity in relation to Chronic Pain Disorder. Employment In an increasingly busy employment practice, Ben has experience of a broad range of disputes across the employment law spectrum. His practice encompasses unfair and wrongful dismissal, redundancy, breach of contract, non-payment of wages, both sexual and racial discrimination and victimization claims. Ben receives instructions from employers and employees in equal measure. Represented an Employer, a farmer, who, although he had unfairly dismissed an employee, did not have to pay a significant award due to the employee’s own actions, in reliance on the case of Polkey. Successfully represented the employee, a nursery nurse,who was found to have been unfairly dismissed after a full hearing and awarded substantial sums in compensation. Successfully represented a Head of Service of a local Council, who was found to have been unfairly dismissed when the Employer’s redundancy selection procedure failed. Experience in dealing with issues of protected disclosures, victimization, discrimination and contractual breaches.

Benjamin Whittingham

Benjamin Whittingham accepts instructions across all aspects of common law. Ben completed pupillage under the supervision of Adam Birkby in September 2020. Before joining chambers, Ben read modern languages at the University of Edinburgh. He converted to law with a GDL, achieving a distinction and several prizes for exam performance in tort, land law, and EU law. Ben is also a qualified mediator with success in both national and international student mediation and negotiation competitions. Crime He undertakes prosecution and defence work in both the Magistrates’ and the Crown Court. His more notable recent cases have involved serious offences, including death by careless driving which involved a successful defence of automatism, rape and sexual assault, industrial scale cannabis cultivation and supply, and assisting an offender after a drive-by shooting. He recently enjoyed success in the Court of Appeal, achieving a one-third reduction in the custodial term. He also acts in private prosecutions covering environmental offences or offences of animal cruelty. Regulatory Ben completed a programme of weekly advisory work for the Care Quality Commission which considered the merits of potential reasonable excuse defences for breach of s33 Health and Social Care Act 2008. The thoroughness of his preparation was praised by his instructing solicitor at the CQC, who also commended his clear, consistently sound advice. Ben has an established practice in professional disciplinary work. He regularly drafts statements of case, advises on case preparation, and presents for Social Work England in both interim and substantive hearings. His work has involved such issues as the admission of evidence given out of the jurisdiction, adverse inferences, hearsay and bad character. Tribunals have commended his focused and fair submissions. He is especially keen to develop his practice in this area, making full use of the skills he has developed in criminal work from the lower courts to the Court of Appeal. Family Ben’s family practice is growing. He adopts the same forensic approach to case preparation as he does in his criminal practice. He conducts all manner of private family work, including in child arrangement applications and applications for injunctive relief. Instructing solicitors note the trust he inspires in those he represents. He particularly welcomes early involvement in cases and is more than happy to advise on case preparation in advance of final hearings. He is committed to effective and timely communication with lay and professional clients. He has also accepted instructions in matrimonial finance work. Civil Ben’s practice is a mixture of purely advisory and court-based work. He accepts instructions from insurers in RTAs. He has advised about liability under the OLA regimes in respect of users of private access roads, liability for public authorities from third party use of land, and contractual disputes. He has also been instructed to advise a local authority about excessive user, injunctive relief and private rights of way generally.

Chloe Hudson

Chloe Hudson’s practice encompasses criminal and regulatory work. Her particular areas of specialism are cases with a medical aspect and sexual offences. She has been instructed by the General Medical Council to appear at Fitness to Practise Hearings for many years, giving her substantial specialist knowledge to bring to criminal work with a medical element and involving expert witnesses. She undertakes drafting and advisory work in all areas of her practice and is a popular choice of junior and enjoys a significant amount of led work. In February and March 2021, leading Ashleigh Metcalfe, Chloe Hudson prosecuted James Macken for the murder of Daniel Jeffries. The Defendant was found guilty after a three week trial and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum period of 16 years. Led by Nicholas Lumley KC, Chloe was a finalist in the Dennis Hoban Award for Crime Investigation awarded by the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police for their work on Operation Panelmill, the investigation into the death of Tyron Charles who was shot in a shipping container on a smallholding in Denholme, Bradford in 2018 and then buried on moors near Oxenhope. James Sutcliffe was sentenced to 31 years’ imprisonment for the murder. Chief Constable John Robins, stated: Working as a team, you showed innovation in both investigative practise and evidence presentation to ensure justice for a murder victim and his family in what was an extremely challenging enquiry. Since 2012 Chloe has been an external lecturer to medical students at Manchester Medical School, the University of Manchester, on the law and procedure of the General Medical Council and Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service. Crime Chloe has a busy practice encompassing all areas of Criminal Litigation in the Crown Court. She is a Level 4 Prosecutor and is on the Crown Prosecution Service Rape and Child Sexual Abuse list of specialist prosecutors. Crime is a significant proportion of Chloe’s practice and she regularly appears, for both the prosecution and the defence, in a range of cases dealing with serious crime including: murder, manslaughter, serious sexual assaults, drugs and violence. Chloe has expertise in dealing with cases involving non-accidental injuries to babies and small children, particularly those with concurrent family proceedings. She recently prosecuted a so called ‘shaken baby’ case involving the leading experts in this field of medicine being led by Dafydd Enoch KC. Regulatory Chloe prosecutes doctors on behalf of the General Medical Council before the Fitness to Practise Tribunals of the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service. The hearings cover all aspects of professional misconduct by doctors, including deficient professional performance and often involve extremely sensitive subject matter. She has worked on many cases that have received national coverage.

Chloe Fairley

Chloe Fairley is an outstanding and persuasive advocate, with an exceptional ability to put both professional and lay clients at ease. She has built a strong practice in criminal law, both prosecuting and defending in a wide range of criminal cases of a serious and complex nature. She has also successfully defended professionals charged in cases involving regulatory, fraud or sexual offences. She has extensive experience of regulatory and disciplinary proceedings in particular appearing before the GMC and Police Misconduct Panels. Particularly noted for her sympathetic and effective handling of vulnerable defendants and witnesses. Crime Operation Ashburn (2024). Prosecution Junior in six-handed murder trial. R v Pearson (2022). Prosecution Junior in murder trial involving cross-border intelligence. R v Chana. Prosecution junior in murder involving parenticide. Regulatory Chloe regularly successfully prosecutes high profile GMC cases before the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service and was instructed to advise the GMC in respect of the Infected Blood Enquiry. Chloe also regularly defends in Police Misconduct Proceedings. GMC v Dr M. Doctor found to have sexually assaulted his former partner whilst his partner was asleep. There had been no criminal proceedings. The findings were upheld in the High Court. GMC v Dr Sait. Instructed by the GMC following an initial appeal relating to findings of sexual motivation. Mostyn J described the cross examination by Miss Fairley as ‘a model of that art’. Sait v GMC [2019] EWHC 3279 Admin GMC v Dr MA. Instructed by the GMC in a case involving allegations that the doctor had provided medication to a friend who has subsequently died. Police Misconduct Represented PC RB in relation to gross misconduct allegations of honesty and integrity. Officer alleged to have failed to properly investigate allegations of sexual misconduct. Represented PC A in relation to gross misconduct allegations of honesty and integrity, confidentiality, duties and responsibilities and discreditable conduct. Officer alleged to have obtained information about an ongoing criminal investigation. Represented PC T in relation to gross misconduct allegations of honesty and integrity, confidentiality, duties and responsibilities and discreditable conduct. Officer alleged to have pursued an improper relationship with a witness. Inquests Instructed (with Paul Greaney KC and Sam Green KC) for the Police Federation of England and Wales in the inquests arising from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. Represented Custody Officer at Inquest following a death immediately following a release from custody. Represented family of deceased killed by a hit and run driver.

Christopher Rose

Christopher Rose practises in high level, serious and complex crime. He is a hugely experienced trial advocate, appearing in criminal courts across the country. He acts as a leader and is often himself led by King’s Counsel. His work encompasses homicide, serious organised crime and serious sexual offending. Complimentary to his criminal practice, Christopher specialises in professional disciplinary work. He is regularly instructed to represent professionals accused of misconduct by their regulators. Crime Christopher’s criminal practice has a heavy emphasis upon organised crime. He both prosecutes and defends and his practice includes cases of homicide, large-scale drug supply, serious firearms offences and sexual offending. A level 4 Prosecutor for the CPS, he is regularly instructed by the CPS’s Complex Case Unit and is a member of the CPS Serious Crime Panel. R v St Claire and others (2024) (Hull Crown Court). Led junior for the Crown in a prosecution of six defendants for murder. R v O and others (2023) (Sheffield Crown Court). Leading Counsel for the Crown prosecuting a conspiracy to facilitate breaches of immigration law which resulted in convictions against all defendants. R v Castledine and Clitheroe (2022) (Sheffield Crown Court). Prosecution of two defendants for attempted murder. Regulatory Christopher’s professional disciplinary work includes representing health care practitioners at disciplinary hearings and coroner’s inquests. He presents on behalf of the GMC and regularly appears on behalf of Registrants before the NMC. Christopher also represents police officers accused of misconduct, having previously acted as an independent legal advisor for police disciplinary panels. GMC v. Stan (2024) (MPTS). Representing the GMC in proceedings against a Senior House Officer for carrying out multiple sexual assaults against patients. GMC v WZ (2023) (MPTS). Representing the GMC in proceedings against an anaesthetist for misconduct resulting in the death of two patients. GMC v BQ (2019) (MPTS). Led junior for GMC in allegations of misconduct against a Harley Street eye surgeon accused of mis-selling costly treatment for macula degeneration. The proceedings resulted in the surgeon being erased from the medical register.

Claire Anderson

Claire Anderson is a junior criminal practitioner, who prosecutes and defends, both on her own and as junior counsel. Claire is routinely instructed on behalf of the prosecution in complex and multi-handed cases across the full spectrum of criminal law. This includes serious violence, sexual offending, frauds and drug offences. She acts on behalf of a variety of agencies, including the Crown Prosecution Service, HMRC, the DWP, DVSA and the Environment Agency. When defending, she is instructed to represent clients charged with serious allegations including matters of sexual and violent offending. Based in Newcastle, she is known for her thorough preparation and her friendly, honest and common-sense approach to her cases. Claire has experience of being a ‘led-junior’ in a number of high-profile nationally reported cases, including R v MS (Prosecution junior in an attempted murder), R v OS (Prosecution junior in a six-week multi-handed trial involving numerous sexual allegations against vulnerable women) and R v LM (Defence junior in a murder/ conspiracy to commit GBH trial). Claire predominantly prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court. She is a CPS Level 3 prosecutor with an established Crown Court practice. She has experience in a variety of offences including dishonesty and drugs offences, to sexual offending and violent offences including GBH and murder. Example Cases R v NK [2024]. Defence of NK, in a nationally reported case. NK was sentenced for evading around £630,000 worth of duty on over 2 million counterfeit cigarettes. R v KS [2024]. Represented the interests KS in Operation Opaque. She was one of 17 defendants charged by the HMRC with cheating the public revenue. The total value of the fraud was in excess of £1 million. KS received a suspended sentence of imprisonment. R v JS [2023]. Successful prosecution of JS, who was charged with numerous allegations of rape. This case involved an extremely vulnerable complainant, who suffered from numerous learning difficulties and developmental delays. JS was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.

Daisy Wrigley

Daisy Wrigley accepts instructions in criminal, family and civil matters. Daisy joined chambers after the completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Geraldine Kelly and Chloe Fairley. As such, she has observed and supported experienced counsel in serious trials and a wide variety of cases, prosecuting and defending in the Crown Court and magistrates’ court, and at the General Medical Council. Daisy is organised, has attention to detail and is able to work to tight deadlines. She recognises the importance of ensuring that her clients understand how the law applies to their specific circumstances and ensures that each client’s needs are met at all times. Rex v SM (Hull Crown Court, August 2024) - Represented the Appellant in an appeal against conviction for two charges of failing to provide information as to the identity of a driver. SM was the Director of a Company to which the relevant vehicle was registered. The Crown failed to properly pursue the Company prior to pursuing SM as a Director and there was no basis for her being pursued as an individual. The Crown refused to offer no evidence so an application to dismiss was made. Not guilty verdicts entered on both charges. Defence costs order granted. Rex v JS (Bradford Magistrates’ Court, August 2024) - Prosecuted a trial for driving with a proportion of specified controlled drug above the specified limit. The Defence took issue with continuity of blood samples, procedure, and consent of the Defendant and the Doctor. The trial included multiple legal arguments, including the Defence seeking to exclude key Prosecution evidence and admit expert evidence mid-trial. Following successful legal arguments, a guilty verdict was returned. Rex v JV (Newton Aycliffe Magistrates’ Court, August 2024) - Represented JV who was charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm, which was captured on CCTV. Despite no independent evidence that the injury could have been caused during a different altercation that evening, the Court was persuaded to return not guilty verdicts. Defence costs order granted. Rex v E (Leeds Youth Court, July 2024) - Represented a troubled youth charged with a common assault against his grandfather. No evidence offered at trial. Rex v FM (Leeds Magistrates’ Court, June 2024) - Represented FM who had pleaded guilty to two charges of failing to provide a specimen for analysis and criminal damage. An interim disqualification had been imposed at the First Hearing due to the seriousness of the offending. Following successful mitigation, the disqualification was not extended, and FM was sentenced to a fine. Rex v DF (Peterlee Magistrates’ Court, April 2024) - Represented DF for one charge of failing to provide information as to the identity of a driver. The Crown were invited to discontinue the case on the basis that Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 was not triggered. The Crown refused and the matter proceeded to trial. Following a successful half-time submission, the case was dismissed. Defence costs order granted. Rex v LA (Sheffield Magistrates Court, April 2024) - Prosecuted a trial involving of three Complainants, one being the Defendant’s ex-partner. The charges related to three common assaults, threats to cause damage to property and criminal damage. Guilty verdicts on all charges. Rex v JMC (Peterlee Magistrates’ Court, May 2024) - Represented JMC for an exceptional hardship application. A disqualification from driving would have resulted in JMC losing his employment in turn impacting JMC’s employer and employees. Exceptional hardship found and disqualification avoided. Rex v MP (Leeds Magistrates’ Court, March 2024) - Represented MP who was charged with criminal damage. Successfully opposed the Crown’s application to adjourn on the basis that the Complainant had not attended due to illness. The Crown offered no evidence.

Danielle Gilmour

Danielle Gilmour accepts instructions in a range of crime and civil work, and is developing a strong regulatory practice. Danielle joined New Park Court in 2018, after successfully completing pupillage under the supervision of Chloe Fairley. Prior to coming to the Bar, Danielle was the Clerk to a Judge in the Queen’s Bench Division dealing with cases involving complex clinical negligence, personal injury, breach of contract, administrative law, regulatory appeals (involving the SRA, GMC and NMC) and serious crime around the country. Danielle provides evidential reviews in both civil and criminal matters on a range of issues, has advised on cases involving complicating online and international jurisdiction issues and is currently representing the interests of North West Fire Control in the Manchester Arena Inquiry, led by Robert Smith KC. Crime Danielle is approved as a Grade 3 Advocate for the Crown Prosecution Service and regularly prosecutes trials and sentences in the Crown Court dealing with cases involving offences against the person, weapons, dishonesty, public order and controlling and coercive behaviour. Danielle also appears for defendants in both the magistrates and Crown Courts; dealing with cases at the beginning during first appearances, trials and being instructed for sentencing hearings. She has experience in handling vulnerable witnesses and defendants, including acting successfully for the defence of a vulnerable adult in a theft case involving issues of capacity, expert psychology evidence and a ground rules hearing. Danielle has experience of handling vulnerable witnesses and sensitive issues in domestic violence cases and those involving coercive control. She acts for both sides in road traffic offences, including dangerous driving matters, and regularly and successfully appears in cases involving exceptional hardship and special reasons arguments. Danielle is regularly instructed to prosecute on behalf of the Home Office and the Probation Service. Coronial/ Regulatory Danielle spent time observing Chloe Fairley representing the GMC in fitness to practise hearings and assisted in the preparation of regulatory advice. Danielle is developing her coronial and regulatory experience and practice: she has been instructed to act on behalf of the interested party at inquest; and she has undertaken a secondment with the Care Quality Commission to advise on criminal and civil enforcement matters. Danielle is regularly asked to advise on a range of issues for the CQC in cases which often involve complex factual and legal issues prior to enforcement action being taken, and in relation to complex company/provider structures ahead of sentencing matters. Danielle has been instructed in the successful conduct of criminal trials (CQC v Hillgreen, led by Paul Greaney K.C.), sentences and legal arguments on jurisdiction with a focus on issues of limitation (CQC v RMBI). Danielle has in addition acted for the CQC in the successful conduct of Urgent Applications to Suspend or Cancel Registration, and First Tier Tribunal Appeals ranging from half a day to 15 day time estimates. (CQC v TAC, ABC LLP v CQC [2019 and 2021], GRNH v CQC) Danielle has advised on specific issues of disclosure, with a focus on patient/service user confidence, issues relating to GMC Good Practice Guidance in particular on Consent and advising on issues relating to the Memoranda of Understanding shared between the CQC and other Regulators. Danielle is currently instructed in a matter involving limitation arguments and interpretation of s90 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (not yet considered by the Divisional Court) and has been instructed multiple times to assist with advice on enforcement action against online and web-based medical services and regulated activities both within the UK and in international jurisdictions. Civil Danielle acts on behalf of claimant and defendant in small claims trials in personal injury, road traffic issues and employer’s liability cases. She appears in Fast Track Trials, Small Claims and regularly conducts Stage 3 hearings. Danielle has also acted in breach of contract matters and successful preliminary applications for strike out, summary and default judgment. Regularly instructed to advice on quantum for Part 8 proceedings for infants and protected parties. Public Law Building on her experience in administrative law; Danielle accepts instructions in judicial review and advising on the merits of appeals, and has also been instructed to advise on matters involving statutory interpretation in international jurisdictions.

David Povall

David Povall is a specialist criminal practitioner, having spent his entire career to date appearing both for the Crown and the defence across the full scope of criminal work in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal. In recent years, he has tended to prosecute more than defend, and has increasingly specialised in sensitive cases involving evidence from vulnerable witnesses. He has significant experience in seeking disclosure from the family courts for the purposes of criminal proceedings. In addition to his court practice, he is a Lincoln’s Inn advocacy trainer and a facilitator for compulsory vulnerable witness training. Crime David is an experienced prosecutor, acting as junior alone and leading junior, whose practice in recent years has consisted largely of serious sexual offences, involving historic allegations, and children and other vulnerable witnesses. He is also experienced in complex, multi-handed cases involving organized crime, including drugs trafficking and firearms. Having worked in financial services before coming to the Bar, he is also comfortable in fraud cases and other contexts, including confiscation proceedings, where there is substantial documentary and financial evidence. R v SB Prosecuting a case of historic sex abuse, covering over 30 years of offending, with 6 complainants, male and female, child and adult. Drafting the indictment required specialist and detailed knowledge of the relevant law, as repeatedly amended over the indictment period. A number of the complainants were severely emotionally damaged and required particular care. R v BM & ors Leading for the prosecution in a case of wholesale trafficking of Class A drugs. A complex jigsaw of telephone, observation and physical evidence had to be built into a clear and coherent case against each defendant individually and an overall narrative. R v AP Prosecuting a case of familial child sex abuse with three young complainants, one of whom had selective mutism and was thus unable to give oral evidence. Her evidence was eventually given with the assistance of an intermediary and through a laptop computer linked to the court screens.

David Outterside

David has been involved in complex, sensitive and serious cases across the Country over the past decade. A heavyweight criminal practitioner with a focus on matters involving fatality, attempt murder, firearms and drug supply. Often a leading junior in complex conspiracy cases, he impresses professional and lay clients with a direct, thorough and thoughtful approach to any jury trial. Murder & Manslaughter R v Layton (2024) Trial. Murder. Tried by HHJ Crowson. The Defendant opened the Victim’s car door after a dispute and stabbed him to death. R v Moumeche (2023) Trial. Junior alone. Trial Judge HHJ Shaun Smith KC. Prosecuting a Silk. Single punch Manslaughter of pensioner in Derby bus station by a then 16 year old boy with the cognitive age of a 13 year old. An exceptionally sensitive and high profile case. R v Roberts (2023) Plea. Junior Alone. Defence. Judge Adkin KC at Durham Crown Court. Defendant serving a life sentence tried to cut off another inmate’s head. Remarkably, the victim survived. Other indictments of s18 on prisoner and attempt 18 on HMP Frankland prison officer. New life sentence passed. Serving at HMP Wakefield in perpetuity. Organised Crime R v Wheelhouse (2022-2023) Trial. Defence. One of two lead Defendants in this conspiracy to manufacture firearms by converting blank firing pistols. 6 Defendants in the trial. Tried by the Recorder of Nottingham – HHJ Nirmal Shant KC. Cut throat defence conducted with the other lead Defendant who was represented by Silk. R v Charnelle Harris (2021) Trial. Defence. Two men kneecapped a rival Nottingham drug dealer with a handgun. Tried by former Recorder of Nottingham HHJ Greg Dickinson KC. Represented the estranged girlfriend with whom they immediately sought refuge. Assist offender. R v Lisa Unwin (2020) Trial. Defence. Tried by HHJ Burgess. 1 month conspiracy trial. Cut short by the pandemic. Sexual Offences (Trial unless stated) R v W (2023) Prosecution. Tried by HHJ Coupland in August 2023. 3 adult Complainants making historic allegations. One of which was a learning disabled autistic man with an IQ of 45. R v R (2023) Defence. Man alleged to have raped his best friend after an evening’s drinking. R v S (2023) Defence. Student accused of choking and raping his ‘casual partner’ in halls of residence at the University of Nottingham. Drugs (Each of these a Trial) R v Kahsai (2023) Defence. Tried by HHJ Watson. Two Defendants accused of offering to supply cocaine to a student in Nottingham City Centre. An argument developed whereupon the co-Defendant punched the Victim and killed him. Represented this Defendant for offer to supply only, but a very sensitive trial. R v Holbrook (2023) Defence. To be tried in June 2024. Kilos of class A brought in to the UK through Liverpool. Multi million pound operation. Ongoing. R v Bullivant (2018) Defence. Tried by HHJ Coupland in a one month trial in Nottingham. Road Fatalities R v Haslam (2023) Plea. 19 year old Defendant killed his best friend in an accident. The Solicitor General appeared in person in the Court of Appeal to seek an increase to the 2 year 8 month sentence. Temporarily the guideline case for category 2 and 3 death by dangerous driving offences before the new definitive guideline was published in June 2023. R v Stokes (2023) Plea. A young mother lost control of her car on a County Durham road and killed her 3 year old child and her cousin. Several other road users seriously injured. Sentenced by HHJ Adkin KC at Durham Crown Court. R v Caraleaunu (2019) Trial. Ultimately resolved. Led by Martin Heslop KC. The Defendant ran over the Deceased on a park and ride car park in Nottingham. The trial was heard by Mr Justice Smith. Recent Court of Appeal Appearances 2023 – Adam Wilson – Trading Standards regulatory offences. 2023 – Daniel Henson – s20 sentence. 2023 – Liam Haslam – Defending against the Solicitor General seeking to increase.

Eleanor Fry

Eleanor Fry deals with a broad range of complex and sensitive matters in the criminal and family jurisdictions and before regulatory/disciplinary tribunals, often with cross-jurisdictional aspects. Crime Eleanor’s criminal experience, as a junior alone, leading and/or led junior includes prosecution and defence and ranges from cases of fraud to violence, child cruelty, rape and other sexual assaults, attempts to pervert the course of justice, misconduct in a public office, operational cases involving allegations of serious organized crime, terrorism offences and murder/manslaughter. Crime Eleanor regularly prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court (as a junior alone, leading and led junior), in cases involving murder, manslaughter, causing death or serious injury by dangerous driving, rape and other sexual offences, misconduct in a public office, attempts to pervert the course of justice, dishonesty, violence including child cruelty, etc. Eleanor has prosecuted and defended in cases involving the defence of insanity and has conducted numerous complex, multi-handed operational and sensitive cases, involving medico-legal (including sleep), scientific, ballistic, telephone and financial experts, and children and other vulnerable witnesses. She also has experience of representing both sides in cases involving private prosecutions and regulatory offences. R v N [2022]. Led junior, prosecuting the murder of a woman by her husband on their wedding night. R v M and others [2022]. Led junior, prosecuting firearms offences and allegations of violence. R v H [2022]. Led junior, defending in allegations of very serious violence towards a very young baby. Regulatory Since 2016, Eleanor has been instructed regularly by the General Medical Council to conduct GMC Investigation Committee hearings and fitness to practise, non-compliance and review hearings before the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service. These proceedings have included expert evidence spanning numerous different medical fields, vulnerable witnesses, remote evidence, legal argument regarding the admissibility of material and have covered the following allegations (often combined): Misconduct, including sexually motivated misconduct and dishonesty Convictions/cautions Deficient Professional Performance Insufficient Levels of English Impairment by reason of ill-health Inquests Eleanor has experience of representing various IPs at inquest and PIR hearings, before juries and coroners sitting alone, including in cases involving complex expert medical evidence (pathology, psychiatry, endocrinology, emergency medical, renal, trauma surgery, cardiology, etc.) and other expert evidence (toxicology, engineering, psychology, etc.) and evidence on police and prison systems and procedures. Eleanor has experience of drafting submissions on the engagement of Article 2, the scope of the inquest, the conclusions to leave to a jury, the making of prevention of future death notices, etc. Family Eleanor regularly appears in applications in the High Court or on behalf of parents, children and local authorities in the Family Court in private and public law proceedings under the Children Act 1989. Representation at case management hearings, findings of fact and final hearings of public and private law applications involving allegations of serious physical and sexual violence (both recent and non-recent), serious emotional harm, involvement in organised crime etc. Use of special measures and other technology (ABE, video-link, TV-link, telephone evidence (for experts), screens, pre-recorded cross-examination, written/pre-prepared cross-examination, etc.) Representation of respondents in child abduction cases under the Hague Convention in the High Court of Justice (at the RCJ). Representation of applicants and respondents in applications for international or national relocation. Involvement on all sides of private law proceedings – applications for CAOs, SIOs, PSOs, SGOs. Involvement in cases involving the Official Solicitor and where the Home Office has intervened.

Emma Hughes

Emma Hughes specialises in criminal, family and civil law matters. Emma has experience representing both claimants and defendants in a variety of cases. Family Emma has a wealth of experience of both private and public family matters within her Family Law practice. Emma is regularly instructed within private family law proceedings by both applicants and respondents, in applications such as Child Arrangement Orders to determine residence and contact for a child, specific issues and prohibited steps orders. Emma is capable of representing both sides in cases where allegations are made which prevent contact taking place between a parent and a child. Emma is able to deal with serious issues of domestic abuse, including sexual abuse, in a way that remains sensitive, whilst still being able to fully challenge the evidence on both sides. Emma’s involvement in public family law proceedings oftentimes finds her representing respondent parents against allegations of neglect, failure to protect, sexual abuse and/or non-accidental injuries. Finding of Fact hearings are also often ran successfully by Emma, in both the private and public arena. Emma also appears in matters of injunctive relief where domestic violence is alleged (for both the accused and the accuser), such as Non-Molestation Orders, at both ex-parte and contested hearings. Emma ensures that those accessing the Court system are able to do so to the best of their ability. Those with additional needs or require an intermediary will feel listened to and understood, ensuring that all the support that is available will be in place. similarly, she has experience dealing with all family cases (including cases involving BAME families and children and social services) where a cultural issues feature, as well as issues such a honour based violence, and often works alongside interpreters to ensure parties feel understood and listened to. Emma’s relationship with clients is one that she often appears from the very first hearing, ensuring she can deal with matters all the way through to final hearing. She understands the importance of client-counsel relationships and will ensure she is there for her client’s in every way she can, creating a trusting partnership you can rely on during proceedings. Her ability to work amicably with others ensures great outcomes without unnecessary delay or expense. Crime Emma has appeared for both the Prosecution and the Defence in proceedings in the Magistrates’ Court and in the Crown Court. In the Crown Court, Emma’s defence work has included committals for sentence and Newton hearings for driving offences, thefts and possession of bladed articles and has also undertaken work for both prosecution and defence in appeals from the Magistrates’ Court. Emma has also been a junior on a Crown Court trial for Arson with intent to endanger life which lasted several weeks. Emma has also prosecuted in Crown Court trials, as well as dealing with the issues of intermediaries for both vulnerable witnesses and Defendants, ensuring that each Court appearance is as comfortable as possible for every Court user. In the Magistrates’ Court, Emma appears in cases from first appearance through to trials and sentencing hearings on both sides of representation. These cases cover a broad range of offences and have involved vulnerable victims and defendants. Predominantly in the Magistrates, Emma represents Defendants in drink and drug driver charges and other driving related offences. Emma has also appeared in private prosecutions for breach of fire regulations. Civil Emma has appeared in a significant number of County Court matters for both claimant and defendant, including small claims, fast track claims, Stage 3 hearings and disposal hearings. These have included personal injury matters, contractual disputes (including consumer credit matters and return of goods) and property disputes (such as landlord and tenant disputes and mortgage matters). She has also dealt with bankruptcy proceedings, including contested bankruptcy hearings, change of carriage matters and injunctions. Emma has also represented both applicant and respondent in procedural applications such as default and summary judgment (including setting aside).

Felicity Hemlin

Felicity Hemlin has an established criminal and family law practice. She has experience both prosecuting and defending serious cases in the Crown Court, both on her own and as junior counsel. Her family practice encompasses all aspects of both private and public law acting on behalf of family members, local authorities, the guardian and interveners in the High Court, County Court and Family Proceedings Courts. She is known for her thorough preparation of cases whilst also putting clients at ease. Crime Felicity instructed on behalf of both the defence and the Crown Prosecution Service. She has also prosecuted on behalf of the police, Local Councils, the Probation Service and the Home Office. Felicity is instructed on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service exclusively in the Crown Court and is a Grade 3 Prosecutor. Furthermore, Felicity acts in both the Crown and Magistrates’ Court in public and private defence cases and in parole hearings. Both her prosecution and defence work cover a wide range of offences including: Serious violence Serious sexual offences including rape, historic child abuse and possession of indecent images. Drugs offences including conspiracy to supply Class A drug. Firearms offences. Offences involving large-scale public disorder Armed robbery and aggravated burglary. Fraud including benefit and mortgage fraud, money laundering and fraud by false representation. Immigration offences. Proceed of Crime Act hearings. Specialist driving offences including exceptional hardship, special reasons and other technical defences. She is also experienced in dealing with cases which involve: vulnerable witnesses, forensic and medical expert evidence, extensive amounts of disclosure and third party material, public interest immunity applications, cross admissibility, production orders, hearsay and bad character applications. Regulatory Felicity has appeared in a number of complex regulatory cases with successful results. Felicity is keen on expanding her regulatory practice in particular through representing public bodies, building upon her experience in prosecuting criminal matters for the CPS and others. Family Felicity has experience of dealing with public and private law proceeding under the Children Act 1989, financial remedy proceedings and applications for injunctions under the Family Law Act 1996.

Fiona Lamb

Fiona Lamb only accepts instructions for the defence and has developed a very busy practice. She completed a reduced pupillage at Farringdon Chambers in London under the supervision of Ian Henderson (now K.C). Fiona began tenancy after only 9 months of pupillage. She joined New Park Court Chambers in February 2016 after 16 months of practice on the South Eastern Circuit. Fiona goes above and beyond for her clients. She is able to adopt a variety of approaches which allows her to greatly assist those with mental health issues in particular. Fiona’s passion and diligence whilst defending her clients is plain to see. She has often been commended on the quality of her closing speeches. Led Briefs R v AA - Operation Silver (Newcastle Crown Court) - Conspiracy to produce cannabis. Led by Paul Rooney from Fountain Chambers and instructed by Asghar & Co Solicitors. The first trial commenced in August 2023 but the jury were discharged. The trial is currently listed in August 2024 and is expected to last 5 weeks. R v MP – Operation Slayley (Newcastle Crown Court) – Conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. Led by Paul Rooney from Fountain Chambers and Instructed by Forrester Solicitors for D1. Following a 14 week trial, MP was unanimously convicted of both counts. He was sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment. R v MJ - Operation Slaley (Newcastle Crown Court) - Conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. Led by Gavin Doig and instructed by Forrester Solicitors for D3. MJ pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 5 years and 11 months’ imprisonment. Sexual offences R v BF (Newcastle Crown Court) - Attempted rape of a child under 13 years and other sexual offences. This case involved the attempted rape and other penetrative sexual offences against an 11 year old girl. BF also committed penetrative sexual offences against her 12 year old sister. BF was sentenced to 33 years custody made up of a custodial element of 27 years and 6 years extended sentence. Following the disclosure of further relevant material at the pre-recording of the cross-examination, the Judge expressed that Fiona had “dealt with it exceptionally and with a very cool head”. She was praised for her professionalism throughout the case. She was further praised by the Judge for her “careful, detailed and commendable written submissions” submitted for the sentencing hearing. R v RM (Newcastle Crown Court) - Rape of a child under 13 years and other sexual offences. This case involved the prolonged sexual abuse and rape of a 5 year old girl by RM who was 50 years old at the time. He pleaded guilty to 5/11 counts on the indictment, including perverting the course of justice, and had a trial on the remaining counts which all involved penetrative sexual activity and rape. He was convicted unanimously of all counts and received a custodial sentence of 22 years, plus 1 years extended licence. The case was prosecuted by King’s Counsel. Fiona was praised for dealing with the case with “great sensitivity, care and skill”. R v ACK (Durham Crown Court) – Rape of a child under 13 years and other sexual offences. The case involved rape and other sexual offences of a male child under 13 years (between 7-9 years) and ACK who was then aged between 15-17 years. The complaint had been made 25 years later. ACK was convicted after trial of all counts on the indictment. He was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment. Violence R v MR (Newcastle Crown Court) - Attempted murder. Instructed as a junior alone in an attempted murder trial which lasted 5 days. The case involved complex issues relating to fitness to plead and intent. MR was convicted and sentenced to 16 years imprisonment with a 3 year extended licence period. R v AN (Newcastle Crown Court) - Affray. Unanimously acquitted after 5 days in trial. Case involved a neighbour dispute which resulted in AN striking a female neighbour in the face with a spade. The incident was captured on mobile phone footage. Case involved the cross-examination of 7 civilian witnesses and a large amount of unused material relating to previous incidents and hate crimes. Case involved alleged racism from both parties. R v SK (Teesside Crown Court) – Attempt GBH with intent. Secured an acquittal on counts of attempted GBH with intent of a prison officer and possession of a weapon inside a prison. Previous convictions for possession of weapons inside prisons and numerous serious assaults on prison officers committed in three different prisons went before the jury. SK avoided an inevitable finding of dangerousness as a result of the acquittals. Case involved uncommon issues surrounding heightened security, handcuffs applications and his notoriety. SK appeared on the Channel 4 documentary, “Prisons”. Drugs R v KO and Others - Operation Withington (Newcastle Crown Court) - Importation of Class A drugs. Secured a unanimous acquittal after 5 days in trial for an offence of importing a Class A drug (Opium) from Iran involving 3 defendants. KO accepted making 6 phone calls to DHL seeking delivery of the package which contained a gear for a commercial food mixer with 1.65kg of Opium hidden inside. Co-defendant was sentenced to 7 years’ custody. R v KH (Lincoln Crown Court) – Production of cannabis and PWITS cannabis. Instructed in a multi-handed case involving the production of cannabis and possessing cannabis with the intention of supplying it to another. Case involved cell site analysis and served material of over 10,500 pages. KH pleaded guilty. R v TD (Newcastle Crown Court). Represented TD who entered two guilty pleas to cultivation of cannabis. Following unnecessary delays an abuse of argument was made on behalf of TD. The argument was successful, the indictment was stayed and the case dismissed. Fraud & Dishonesty R v CLT & SS – Operation Opaque (Newcastle Crown Court). Fiona represents 2/17 defendants involved in various offences including making false statement intending to defraud the revenue (£1.3m) and money laundering. All defendants await sentence. R v DB and Others – Operation Minted (Durham Crown Court) - Conspiracy to sell counterfeit tobacco. DB was three out of five on the indictment. He was charged with three counts including conspiracy to sell/supply counterfeit tobacco products. The case involved a high page count with a huge volume of undercover surveillance footage following a lengthy investigation by Durham County Council. The estimated turnover of the conspiracy was in the region of £1.2m. DB entered guilty pleas to supplying tobacco without a combined health warning in relation to the tobacco products stored in his loft. All Defendants were sentenced to immediate custody with DB sentenced to 10 months’. R v AC (Teesside Crown Court) – Fraud against elderly mother. Unanimously acquitted after 5 days in trial. The allegations were that AC had stolen and fraudulently obtained over £16,000 from her mother. At the time of the alleged offences the IP was suffering from dementia and cancer. The IP was deceased at the time of trial and her evidence was adduced as hearsay. The IP’s son gave evidence against AC as well as a number of carers. AC accepted making the withdrawals which she said she had done with the IP’s permission. Other R v MO (Newcastle Crown Court) – Perverting the course of justice and manslaughter. MO provided the police with a false alibi after her partner had punched a man resulting in his death. The offence persisted during two police interviews until the truth was finally admitted. MO was sentenced to 9 months’ custody suspended for 18 months’ with various requirements. R v MCA – Operation Dreams (Newcastle Crown Court) – Conspiracy to commit arson. MCA (D4) was one of ten defendants involved in various conspiracies. MCA pleaded guilty to conspiracy to cause arson and failing to surrender. MCA was the arsonist. MCA was sentenced to 14 months’ custody. R v TB (Teesside Crown Court) – Death by careless driving. Sentenced to 9 months suspended for 2 years.

Gabrielle Wilks

Gabrielle Wilks accepts instructions in criminal, family, civil and regulatory matters. Gabrielle joined Chambers following the completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Tom Storey and Eleanor Fry. Crime Rex v KB, Leeds Crown Court (2023) -Prosecution Advocate. Day long appeal including legal submissions as to what amounts to obstruction of a police constable in the execution of their duty. Appeal dismissed. Rex v LV, Grimsby Magistrates Court (2023) - Defence Advocate, 2 x s39 Assault. Listed for trial. Crown sought an adjournment due to lack of an interpreter. This would have been the first adjournment in the case. I opposed. No adjournment granted. No evidence offered. Defence costs order obtained. Rex v SN, Bradford Magistrates Court (2023) - Defence Advocate. Offence: Driving a vehicle over the specified drug limit. After a half a day trial, special reasons were found. No period of disqualification was imposed, after submissions. Family I v I, York Magistrates Court (2023) - Representing the Respondent. Listed for DRA. Negotiated an agreement in the client’s interests without further court involvement needed. AS v BS, Gateshead Country Court (2023) - Represented the Applicant. Enforcement Application. Convinced the court to attach a power of arrest to the enforcement order, grant a Prohibited Steps Order and order a s34 Family Law Act 1986 Order. Civil SL v IL, Leeds County Court (2023) - Representing the Claimant. Possession ordered following submissions. DG v GG, Leeds Country Court (2023) - Appeared on behalf of the claimant. Following a half a day trial, the Court found in the Claimant’s favour. PG v RA, Newcastle-upon Tyne Country Court (2023) - Appeared on behalf of the Claimant. The Judgement sum as requested by the Claimant was awarded. Regulatory CQC v PCHL, Magistrates Court (2023)

Georgina Goring

Georgina Goring specialises in professional discipline, inquests and inquiries and crime. Georgina is recognised by the Legal 500 as a Leading Junior in Inquests and Inquiries. She has been appointed by the Attorney General as Junior Counsel to the Crown due to her specialism in this arena and is currently instructed by the Cabinet Office in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry. In her professional disciplinary work, Georgina sits as a Legally Qualified Chair for the Health and Care Professions Council and a Legal Assessor to fitness to practise panels at both the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the General Optical Council. In her criminal practice, Georgina prosecutes and defends in serious violence, drugs and sexual offences. Georgina is an outstanding advocate and is well known for her personable nature, attention to detail and ability to advise clients regarding complex issues. Georgina delivers training to solicitors in all aspects of her expertise. Regulatory Georgina is vastly experienced in professional disciplinary and regulatory work and is Deputy Head of Chambers’ Regulatory Team. Georgina sits as a Legally Qualified Chair for the Health and Care Professions Council and as a Legal Assessor to fitness to practise panels at both the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the General Optical Council. Georgina has expertise in dealing with all types of fitness to practise proceedings including sexual misconduct, dishonesty and medically complex cases including expert evidence. Georgina’s practice encompasses: prosecuting on behalf of the General Medical Council; defending all professionals in front of their regulatory body, including dentists, pharmacists, nurses, teachers and councillors / therapists; health and safety and fire safety; CQC proceedings; representing both individuals and the NHS in relation to NHS England’s Performers Lists; representing individuals appealing DBS Barring decisions; All aspects of Transport Law and representing companies at Public Inquiries before Traffic Commissioners. Inquests & Inquiries Georgina is recognised by the Legal 500 as a Leading Junior in Inquests and Inquiries. Georgina is currently instructed by the Cabinet Office in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry. In February 2021, Georgina was appointed by the Attorney General as Junior Counsel to the Crown due to her specialism in this arena.  She has extensive experience acting for various medical and care organisations, corporations, governmental bodies and individual interested parties in inquests both with and without juries. Her recent cases involve deaths in state detention (regularly instructed on behalf of the Ministry of Justice), care institutions and due to complex vehicle collisions.  Georgina has a wealth of experience in dealing with care home and medical deaths due to her strong medical regulatory practise. Georgina has delivered various training workshops to organisations in order to assist them to prepare and deal with inquests effectively. Crime Georgina is a CPS Level 3 Prosecutor and has particular experience of cross-examination of young children and medical experts. She defends and prosecutors in all matters. Georgina also has established significant expertise on disclosure issues. She advised the National Crime Agency as Independent Counsel, regarding their disclosure regime relating to the single largest investigation into child sexual exploitation – Operation Stovewood.  For many years, Georgina was also instructed counsel on the Disclosure team for the Hillsborough Disaster Criminal Prosecution.

Geraldine Kelly

Geraldine Kelly is an experienced and extremely able criminal practitioner, who manages a well-balanced practice, consisting of both defence and prosecution work, covering all aspects of criminal law. She delivers reliable and sound advice to her clients. Appearing in the Crown Court on a daily basis has developed her special aptitude for dealing with witnesses, including vulnerable adults, children and experts. Her impressive hard work and attention to detail have allowed her to deal with cases involving voluminous and complex evidence. Regulatory Offences Operation Flip [Leeds Crown Court] (2017). Defended company director accused of various offences within the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, involving the intimidation / deception of elderly / vulnerable customers. The case involved a substantial amount of financial and computer evidence. Operation Verbatim [Leeds Crown Court] (2018) - Defended company director accused of gross negligence manslaughter and fraud, when a baby died in a cot built by him in the course of his business. He then started up a new company and sold a bed, misrepresenting that it had been made to British Standards. This case also involved Health and safety at work practises. The case involved a large volume of computer evidence, namely IP access of email addresses. Defendant pleaded guilty to section 3 Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 after the prosecution case had closed. This was accepted by the prosecution. Murder & Manslaughter R v MF [Grimsby Crown Court] (2022) - Prosecuted a man charged with two counts of rape after DNA evidence linked him to assaults against different women. The defendant was given a life sentence. R v AL [Leeds Crown Court] (2022) - Defended a step-father jointly charged with the mother of the deceased with murdering her 15 year old son, by repeatedly beating him over an 8 month period. Other Violent Offences R v AG [York Crown Court] (2020) - Defended a 16 year old from the travelling community, jointly charged with 2 others with blowing up ATMs and stealing cash around the country. Case involved voluminous cell site/call/ANPR data and CCTV footage. R v E [Leeds Crown Court] (2018) - Defended a male accused of section 18 wounding with intent, stabbing another young male (age 17 at the time of the hearing) but 16 at the time of the offence. Rape & Sexual Offences R v WP [Hull Crown Court] (2021) - Defended a 70 year old defendant accused of historic rape of an 11 year old girl. Acquitted R v HS [Nottingham Crown Court] (2021) - Defended a 25 year old male, jointly charged with 5 others accused of sexual activity with a child under 16, relating to an alleged grooming gang. Fraud & Dishonesty Offences R v G [Leeds Crown Court] (2018). Defended male charged with conspiracy to commit fraud with 5 others, relating to obtaining credit at builders’ merchants, obtaining goods and then not paying for them. The indictment covered a period of and involved £170,000 + of credit obtained. R v B [Grimsby Crown Court] (2017) - Prosecuted a female who was the treasurer of a charity for fraud, abusing a position of trust. The case involved a large volume of accounting data, work diaries and receipts. Drugs & POCA Offences Operation Flip [Leeds Crown Court] (2017) POCA proceedings of around £1,000,000. Operation Kaitlyn [Burnley Crown Court] (2014-2015). Defended one of 6 males, in a case involving a joint West Yorkshire/Lancashire operation for conspiracy to supply class A controlled drugs and possession of prohibited firearms. The voluminous evidence included surveillance, cell site data,telephone traffic data and ANPR data. Court Martial R v M [Catterick Court Martial Centre] (2017) - Defended soldier charged with AWOL. R v KGN J-L [Catterick Court Martial Centre] (2016) - Defended KGN charged with desertion. Modern Slavery R v MI [Leeds Crown Court] (2022) - Prosecuted an 18 year old male accused of modern slavery, involving him forcing a vulnerable male with mental health difficulties to allow him to deal drugs from his home and drive him around. The victim was subject to repeated, humiliating beatings and sexual assaults.

Graham O’Sullivan

Graham O’Sullivan has established a busy practice both prosecuting and defending in the Crown Court. He is a Level 3 Prosecutor and, since 2015, has been briefed in a variety of high profile cases for the CPS CCU (complex casework unit). Having started his practice based in Newcastle, Graham moved to York in 2013, allowing him to develop what is now a circuit-wide practice. Crime Prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court (Adult and Youth). Experienced in dealing with complex and sensitive disclosure issues. Experienced in dealing with all aspects of confiscation proceedings under POCA 2002. Regularly instructed to prosecute on behalf of other government agencies including the Home Office (formerly UKBA), Department of Welfare and Pensions, Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, National Probation Service. Regularly instructed to defend individuals and companies prosecuted by these agencies. R v T (2017) - Prosecution of baby shaking case in Bradford Crown Court. Operation Emerald (2017) - Junior in prosecution of defendants for conspiracy to supply heroin and cocaine in a case linked to the Operation Sanctuary in Newcastle Crown Court. R v D & R & N (2015) - Prosecution of 3-week trial in Newcastle Crown Court of 3 defendants who had defrauded 4 elderly and vulnerable victims of close to £500,000 employing a Ponzi scheme having set up a sham investment company in Dubai. Regulatory Experienced in representing individuals prosecuted by Environment Agency. Experienced in representing individuals prosecuted by and the Foods Standards Agency. Civil Experienced in conduct of forfeiture and condemnation proceedings on behalf of the Home Office (formerly UK Border Agency). Experienced in wide range of cases in the County Court including personal injury, road traffic accidents, claims in relation to the supply of goods and services.

Ian Brook

As a former Ag. High Court Judge in Trinidad & Tobago, Ian tried 11 capital murder cases. He now conducts all manner of criminal cases, for the defence, and prosecutes on behalf of the General Medical Council. He is an approachable, detailed, hard-working, tech-savvy, tenacious, pragmatic advocate, who is down to earth, relates well to a jury, has good court presence, is popular with his lay and professional clients and commands the respect of the Court or Tribunal. During the 8 years he lived in Trinidad, he practised from Trinity Chambers, in Port of Spain, and defended, mainly in capital murder cases, occasionally acting, virtually pro bono. He was appointed an Acting High Court Judge of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago, and held that office from January 2006, until returning to the UK, in late 2008. 3 of the capital murder cases he tried have been considered by the Privy Council: Julia Ramdeen v the State, Privy Council Appeal No 0077 of 2012 Nimrod Miguel v the State, Privy Council Appeal No 0037 of 2010 Burnett v the State, Privy Council Appeal No 0043 of 2009 He keeps himself up to date with current developments in the law, and is trained in Rape and Serious Sexual Offences and the handling of Vulnerable Witnesses. Business, Organised & Individual Crime Now, Ian only defends, and, since 2008, has been involved in cases of homicide; rape and serious sexual offences; indecent images; computer crime; drugs conspiracies; fraud; Customs & Excise offences; money laundering; assisting offenders; attempting to pervert the course of justice, and general offences of violence and dishonesty. R v MM (2024)—[ongoing]. False imprisonment (cuckooing)—participating in activities of Organised Crime Group–threats to kill—Class A drug conspiracies. R v IG (2024). Attempted murder. R v DARREN FEVE (2023). Perverting the course of justice (murder case). Regulatory Ian is regularly instructed to undertake review hearings and fitness to practise hearings on behalf of the General Medical Council. GMC v Dr N (2024). Consultant harassing administrative officer—abuse of power–sexually motivated conduct—protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010). GMC v Dr S (2024). GP making unwanted sexual advances/requests to/of member of staff. GMC v Dr S (2023). Dr alleged weaponisation of regulatory proceedings against him, as he said he was a whistle-blower—dangerous driving conviction—false statement in application form, by omission.

Ian Cook

Ian Cook has dealt with a number of serious trials including arson with intent to endanger life, serious violence and high value dishonesty. He has also been junior counsel on trials of murder, manslaughter by gross negligence, and large drugs conspiracies. Ian is also a grade 3 prosecutor. Ian practiced as a solicitor for 18 years, before his call to the Bar in 2018. For 8 of those years he dealt exclusively with Crown Court cases as a higher courts advocate. R v H - Drugs Conspiracy. Defended in a 16 week drugs conspiracy trial which included a substantial amount of Encrochat evidence R v S & P - Neglect. Prosecuted the managers of a care home for persons with profound learning disabilities for neglect. R v J - Arson. Conducted trial for a defendant facing an allegation of Arson relating to the destruction of iconic Leeds City Centre building. The total damage was in excess of £6 million. R v A - Drugs Consiracy. Defendant charged as part of a multi million pound conspiracy to import, produce and distribute steroid products.

Jade Bucklow

Jade Bucklow accepts instructions in a wide range of areas, including professional discipline, regulatory, inquests and inquiries and crime. Called in 2012, Jade undertook a mixed crime and civil pupillage supervised by Caroline Wigin, a previous tenant at New Park Court who is now a Crown Court Judge sitting at St Albans Crown Court. In 2014, Jade joined the GMC where she held the role of Case Examiner and dealt extensively with the fitness to practise of doctors on the UK Medical Register. Regulatory Jade specialises in healthcare regulation and professional discipline. Jade was a Case Examiner at the General Medical Council for 8 years and now regularly represents and advises the GMC in fitness to practise proceedings against doctors. Jade has extensive experience representing Social Work England in fitness to practice proceedings against Social Workers and has recently been appointed as a tribunal member (Barrister) for the Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service. Jade also regularly advises and represents the Care Quality Commission at the First Tier Tribunal, in appeals against decisions to cancel or restrict the registration of CQC registered healthcare and social care providers. Jade has expertise in dealing with all types of fitness to practise concerns, including dishonesty, serious breaches of professional boundaries, health concerns and deficient professional performance. Jade is able to quickly understand, critically analyse and assimilate complex medical and expert evidence. During her time at the GMC as a Case Examiner, Jade made fitness to practise decisions in all manner of clinical cases. Jade’s cases included fatal prescribing errors, obstetric injury, infant and maternal death, failures to diagnose or appropriately refer, consent issues, infant and adult sepsis and end-of-life care decisions. Her case experience covers a broad spectrum of complex medical procedures, including neurosurgery, laparoscopic surgery, orthopaedic and colorectal surgery. Inquest & Inquiries Jade has experience representing and advising families, Nurses, Care Workers, Care Home Providers and Prison Healthcare Providers as interested parties at inquests and inquiries where the provision of health care is a key feature of the inquest. Inquest touching the death of RR - Acting on behalf of the family in an inquest touching the death of a high-risk pregnant healthcare worker during the COVID – 19 pandemic. The inquest involved the assessment of risk to exposure to COVID -19 in the NHS workplace, and the care provided during the medical management of COVID 19, obstetric emergency and sepsis. Inquest touching the death of AK - Acting on behalf of a nurse in a prison healthcare setting during the Covid – 19 pandemic, where there were concerns about the delay in identifying and treating the deceased’s deterioration. No causative findings were made against the nurse. Inquest touching the death of BO - Acting on behalf of the family, where the deceased had died by suicide and the family had concerns about the prescribing of benzodiazepines.

James Normington

James Normington is an established chancery and commercial practitioner. He brings together insightful understanding of the legal and factual aspects and makes complex matters easy to understand for the lay client. He enjoys teaching and lecturing on all aspects of his practice with a passion for wills, trusts, ecclesiastical law, conveyancing, land law and laws relating to burial grounds. James Normington has lectured on a range of subjects including Costs, Easements, Chancel Repair Liability, Trusts of Land & Chancery Procedure & Protocol. He is also available to give seminars and training upon request. James is also a non-executive director of England’s largest Credit Union. He also served 11 years as an officer in the Royal Air Force Reserves. James is the published author of Digital Assets and Probate: A Practitioner’s Guide. Commercial Law Regularly instructed in Contractual, Commercial & Partnership litigation. Experienced in arbitrations and alternative dispute resolution. Acted & advised in Commercial & Civil frauds. Most notably junior counsel in a £1.5 million commercial fraud case in the High Court. Experienced in advising on contracts involving the carriage of goods by land and sea. Frequently instructed to act and advise in cross-jurisdiction litigation and enforcement matters including English-Scots and transatlantic actions. Routinely instructed in cases involving unlawful conversion of goods. Costs Instructed in all forms of costs proceedings including “costs only” proceedings. Experienced in dealing with wasted costs & “show cause” applications. Frequently instructed in as an advocate in detailed assessments. Professional Negligence Experienced in dealing with multi-party professional negligence actions. Junior Counsel in ‘Son of TAG’ litigation brought by AXA against 78 law firms. Instructed on a number of cases against and on behalf of a wide range of professionals including surveyors, veterinarians, and solicitors. Land, Trusts, Wills & Probate Experienced in acting & advising in trusts involving foreign subject matter & foreign beneficiaries. Frequently instructed in property disputes including easements, rights of way, boundary disputes, trusts of land, private nuisance, adverse possession & trespass for a range of clients including companies, government agencies, local authorities, charities, individuals and unincorporated associations. Acts and advises on wills & probate, both contentious & non-contentious,  including Inheritance Act claims. Experienced practitioner dealing in Ecclesiastical Law. Special interests in Chancel Repair Liability and law relating to burial grounds. Recent cases include acting for a widow in a dispute involving her husband’s burial plot and a mediation involving a private chapel. Landlord & Tenant Regularly instructed to act on behalf of Local Authorities in all aspects of residential housing. Experienced in dealing with commercial property including dilapidation claims. Insolvency & Debt Recovery Experienced in covering all aspects of Bankruptcy & personal insolvency. Frequently instructed by UK financial institutions in debt recovery actions. Experienced in acting and advising on enforcing foreign judgment debts. Co-author of an article on enforcing foreign judgements in England & Wales.

Jason Pitter KC

Jason Pitter KC was called to the Bar in 1994 and commenced pupillage in Chambers in 1995 and became a member in 1996 practicing initially in general crime, personal injury and civil fraud. His practice developed, with a greater emphasis on increasingly complex and serious criminal litigation but rapidly expanded to incorporate professional misconduct and regulatory law, with a particular focus on health and safety and also representing the GMC, GDC and NMC. That was the foundation for his specialist practice in a number of areas for which he has become highly recommended over many years. He is frequently instructed on private and publicly funded basis in the following areas: Crime Defending and prosecuting in major and complex criminal investigations, in particular cases involving: Homicide (including resulting from road traffic collisions and work related accidents) Fraud and serious offences of dishonesty Organised crime including large drug importation and distribution Serious sexual offences Proceeds of crime offences and asset recovery As a result of and linked to work in relation to Professional Misconduct, regularly instructed in the representation number of professional clients facing criminal allegations arising out of alleged misconduct in the workplace (including care home workers, police officers and doctors). These offences include homicide (in particular gross negligence manslaughter and misconduct in a public office), mistreatment of patients, serious sexual offences and serious offences of dishonesty. R v Hillier & Fulstow [2023]. Appeared for the Crown in the successful prosecution of Michael Hillier and Rachel Fulstow for the carefully orchestrated murder of Liam Smith, father of two. The case received widespread national publicity during the six-week trial at Minshull Street Crown Court Manchester. Both defendants received a minimum of 30 years sentence by HHJ Greene who referred to the offence as a brutal and cold-blooded murder. R v Walls & Others [2017]. Represented one of the police helicopter operatives acquitted of misconduct in a public office in relation to allegedly using the video equipment to record members of the public in their own homes in compromising situations. One of the other officers had pleaded guilty. The case received widespread news coverage. R v Ince [2017]. Represented a senior and eminent University principle who faced an allegations of homicide following a road traffic accident. The issues involved vehicle recognition and complex speed analysis especially in relation to the driving of the deceased. The Defendant was acquitted. Complex Road Traffic Instructed on a largely private basis in relation to complex road traffic accidents and disasters especially those involving homicide and complex scientific issues (motion camouflage, vehicle conspicuity, driver visual acuity) and cases where unexplained vehicle acceleration is an issue. Engaged in lecturing bodies engaged in this area of work and more broadly advising on the tactical approach in cases in this area. Regulatory Significant experience of prosecuting and defending in relation to regulatory breaches, in particular cases that have resulted in death, or serious injury. Advising individuals and corporate bodies in relation to compliance. Has previously advised the HSE and corporate bodies at procedural and operational level. Currently instructed in relation to the alleged failings of police officers in relation to the Rotherham Child Sexual Exploitation investigation. Cygnet Learning Disabilities Ltd. Instructed to represent one of the largest care home operators in the country. Successful resolution of enforcement actions and linked appeal in relation to conditions imposed by the CQC under s31 Health and Social Care Act 2008. [Instructed by DAC Beechcroft] GC (nursing home) [2018 onwards]. Instructed to represent care home in relation to CQC investigation and enforcement in relation to a number of deaths of residents. In particular alleged failings centred around the management of patient care and the measures in place to protect residents/patients from the actions (including violence) of other patients/residents. [Instructed by Keoghs] R v Balfour Beatty Utility Solutions and Balfour Beatty Living Places [2017]. Instructed on behalf of the HSE. Largest successful prosecution and financial penalty for historic hand and arm vibration affecting a large number (by exposure and injury) of employees. The case involved complex issues in relation to employee movement, analysis of scientific evidence affecting causation and breach of duty. There was legal argument in relation abuse of process, delay and promise not to prosecute. Professional Misconduct The prosecution of and representation of professional persons at misconduct hearings. In particular cases before the police misconduct panels, cases brought by the General Medical Council, GDC and NMC. Coronial Law Jason has appeared in a number of high profile inquests where there has been an underlying breach of duty leading to death or professional misconduct. This includes death in custody and death in work related deaths. Public Law In particular in relation to claims in relation to the criminal justice system and professional misconduct hearings.

Jemima Stephenson-Finn

Jemima Stephenson-Finn practises in Crime and regularly appears for both Prosecution and Defence in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court. Jemima joined New Park Court in March 2020. She was previously a Tenant at Zenith Chambers, having successfully completed pupillage there. During 2020, Jemima completed a secondment with the Care Quality Commission, carrying out advisory work in relation to potential criminal prosecutions by the CQC. During the secondment, Jemima also represented the CQC at a number of hearings, including the CQC’s first prosecution for breach of the duty of candour obligations. Crime Jemima regularly prosecutes and defends cases in both the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court. Jemima has acted in a number of Crown Court trials, including for offences of s.18 GBH, robbery, burglary, the production and supply of controlled drugs, domestic violence and dangerous driving. Jemima is currently a CPS grade 3 prosecutor. Jemima has experience of proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act. Jemima has acted as defence counsel in a number of confiscation hearings involving drug-related offences and fraud. Jemima was also instructed as junior counsel for the prosecution for confiscation proceedings relating to a large scale conspiracy to supply psychoactive substances. Jemima has acted on a number of occasions as junior counsel. Jemima was instructed as junior counsel in a case involving a conspiracy to cause explosions, where the Defendants attacked a number of ATM machines, taking just under £250,000. Jemima acted as disclosure junior on a Class A drugs conspiracy involving the importation of drugs, which required examination of material obtained from the USA and European countries. She is currently instructed as disclosure junior on a case involving a serious violent disorder, resulting in the death of a young male. Regulatory During 2020, Jemima completed a secondment with the Care Quality Commission, carrying out advisory work in relation to potential criminal prosecutions by the CQC. During the secondment, Jemima also represented the CQC at a number of hearings, including the CQC’s first prosecution for breach of the duty of candour obligations. Jemima is regularly instructed by the Care Quality Commission to carry out pre-charge advisory work on behalf of the CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, relating to a range of health and social care providers, eg care homes, NHS and private hospitals. Jemima has appeared on behalf of the Care Quality Commission for plea and sentence hearings in relation to breaches of Regulation 12 safe care and treatment and Regulation 13 safeguarding service users from improper treatment. Jemima was led by Paul Greaney KC in a case involving a legal argument regarding the nullity of proceedings and the interpretation of the recent High Court decision in Food Standards Agency v Bakers of Nailsea Ltd. Jemima was recently instructed by the Care Quality Commission in a 4 day trial at Beverley Magistrates’ Court. The case related to an incident at a private care home where a service user with a known previous conviction for a sexual offence committed a serious sexual assault on another vulnerable service user. The case involved consideration of expert evidence on the appropriate management of individuals with previous convictions for sexual offences. The Registered Provider entered a guilty plea on the day of trial, and the Registered Manager was convicted after trial. The Registered Provider was sentenced to a fine of £128,000. Press coverage of the case is available here and here

Jeremy Barton

Jeremy Barton specialises in criminal work, predominantly defending. He is frequently instructed on both a private and publicly funded basis in the most serious of criminal matters, in particular fraud, firearms, drugs (including encroChat matters) and sexual offences. He is regularly instructed as junior counsel in murder cases, both defending and prosecuting. Jeremy is a versatile and charismatic advocate who simply does not give up on his case. He is popular and personable with both lay and professional clients and has a confident, calm manner in court. He is particularly good at managing difficult and demanding clients. In addition to criminal work, Jeremy has developed a practice across other quasi criminal areas including professional misconduct, with a particular focus on police discipline, medical defence and coroners’ inquests. Jeremy joined chambers in 2015, having previously spent 11 years in London at 2 King’s Bench Walk and was called to the bar in 2004. Crime Jeremy is VHCC accredited and a VHCC supervisor on behalf of solicitor’s firms who are not VHCC approved, allowing them to undertake VHCC work. Defending and prosecuting in major and complex criminal investigations, in particular cases involving murder, fraud, firearms, drugs and historic sexual grooming cases. Jeremy has defended in multiple high profile grooming cases both as junior alone and led. He has particular knowledge of firearms legislation and a practical knowledge of firearms. He is currently instructed in a number of EncroChat cases and frequently defends in conspiracy cases where mobile phones and high-tech surveillance equipment has been used. R v Z [2023] - 3 month grooming trial. 1st on indictment. Leeds Crown Court. Defending. R v K [2023] - 1 month trial, conspiracy to murder. Manchester Crown Court. Defending. R v S [2023] - 3 month trial, fraud (VHCC). Preston Crown Court. Defending. Police Discipline Jeremy has defended in a large number of police discipline matters both in the South and North of England, often instructed by the Police Federation directly. He has appeared at all levels as Junior counsel at misconduct hearings, on appeal to the police appeals tribunal and to the High Court on judicial review, most notably in the case of Sergeant Mark Andrews who was successfully reinstated in the police force after a 5 year court case during which Jeremy dealt with all matters. Medical Jeremy has defended successfully (instructed by the MDU) at the GMC on behalf of the medical profession at numerous Interim Order Panel Hearings and misconduct hearings where fitness to practise has been called into question. Inquests Jeremy has acted for the police during coroners’ inquests involving death in custody cases where article 2 has been triggered. He has particular knowledge of the custody procedure and cases where Immunosuppressants have featured in the death. Civil Jeremy also has a busy Civil practise predominantly dealing with high value asset recovery and finance matters for some of the most prestigious automobile clients in the world. He has particular expertise in dealing with consumer credit, novation agreements and contracts for hire purchase agreements. Jeremy has experience of defending copyright and trademark matters and was employed by British Telecom in-house, advising on matters concerning intellectual property rights.

Jessica Slaughter

Jessica Slaughter is a specialist criminal barrister. She prosecutes as a level 4 CPS panel advocate and defends in complex criminal cases. Having prior experience as a mixed common law barrister on the South Eastern Circuit, Jessica has chosen to continue her varied experience within family law which complements her criminal caseload. Prior to pupillage, Jessica worked for a domestic violence organisation and has considerable knowledge and experience surrounding these delicate and sensitive issues. Jessica began her career with family law cases in pupillage in 2010. In recent years she has spent more time dealing with complex, serious cases in the Criminal Courts but has always continued with her family law practice throughout her 13 year caseload. In her criminal practice, Jessica regularly deals with issues such as rape and sexual abuse, controlling and coercive behaviour, domestic violence, child neglect, and drug use. Her knowledge of these matters including the disclosure process and police material has proved invaluable in her presentation of her family cases. Jessica applies a meticulous work ethic to her cases. Jessica is approachable and empathetic and clients feel at ease in her company. She can be firm in her advice when necessary and is not afraid to robustly deal with issues in Court. Jessica is able to receive instructions directly from the public in certain cases. Junior Led Briefs R v F (2020) - Led by Michael Hodson for the defence in a case involving multiple allegations of sexual and violent offending within a domestic context. R v Q (2019) - Led by Paul Currer for the prosecution in a 6 week trial resulting in conviction of a mental health nurse who had abused elderly dementia patients in their care home. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-51048840 R v W et al (2018) - Led by Chris Smith for the prosecution in a 6 week trial involving multiple defendants and complex cell site and phone evidence following numerous conspiracies to burgle, steal and defraud in relation to cars and car parts. During the trial Jessica was responsible for examining a number of witnesses. Jessica represented the Crown for the sentencing hearing. Sexual Offences R v C (2019) - Defended client in 6 day trial in relation to historic sex offences involving multiple complainants. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/pervert-scout-master-who-turned-16373741 R v L (2018) - Defended client in 6 day trial in relation to historic rape allegations against a family member. The client was acquitted. R v T - Defended client accused of raping his girlfriend. The case involved lengthy review of unused material including phone communication between the two parties spanning a large time period. Violent Offences R v C (2019) - Defended client in 6 day trial in relation to historic sex offences involving multiple complainants. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/pervert-scout-master-who-turned-16373741 R v L (2018) - Defended client in 6 day trial in relation to historic rape allegations against a family member. The client was acquitted. R v T - Defended client accused of raping his girlfriend. The case involved lengthy review of unused material including phone communication between the two parties spanning a large time period. Dishonesty Offences R v F (2019) - Defended client in blackmail case involving threats towards a political figure. Successfully negotiated basis of plea and resolution to the case which resulted in a 2 year sentence. R v McC (2019) - Defended client at trial for dwelling burglary, after drafting abuse of process argument and successful negotiations with the prosecution, agreed on plea to handling stolen goods resulting in a far shorter sentence for the client. R v P - Defended client accused of dwelling burglary. The case was stopped following legal submissions in respect of DNA and moveable objects. Other R v P (2020) - Prosecuted defendant for transferring criminal property linked to a large scale drugs operation. The value of the imported drugs was in the region of £17.25 million. This defendant’s role related to the transfer of over £200,000 of cash. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/john-purvis-drugs-gang-court-17738704 R v ER (2020) - Defended woman accused of public nuisance offences related to suicide attempts. Following expert evidence on the mens rea issue and negotiation with the prosecution, the Crown offered no evidence. R v W (2019) - Prosecuted 8 day trial for controlling and coercive behaviour, assault and other domestic related offences. The case involved meticulous analysis of messages sent between the defendant and the victim as part of their relationship. Family Jessica’s experienced family practice covers both children and money cases. She has experience acting for the Local Authority, children and parents / family members during public law proceedings. Given her background in supporting domestic violence victims, Jessica is well placed to advise and represent clients in cases involving non molestation and occupation orders. In private law proceedings, she has represented clients with complex issues including applications to transfer proceedings outside the jurisdiction, internal relocation, special guardianship orders, parental alienation and transfer of residence. Jessica represents clients in relation to applications for financial remedies including settlement and final hearings. Her varied cases have provided exposure to a number of issues, including pension disparity, inheritance disagreements and cohabitation disputes. A client represented by Jessica during a financial remedy final hearing who was awarded more than the usual 50% of the marital assets described her attention to detail “second to none”. Re: W (2023) (Private Law) - Instructed in a private law dispute with potential risks of mother relocating abroad with the children. Re: G (2022) (Private Law) - Represented mother in complex private law proceedings with irresolvable issues. After considerable negotiation, it was possible to achieve an agreed shared care order on day 2 of the final hearing. Re: H (2022) (Care Proceedings) - Represented Local Authority in 6 day final hearing involving complex issues with teenage children and a litigant in person parent.

Jessica Strange

Jessica Strange is a specialist criminal practitioner who has a well balanced practice defending and prosecuting in all types of criminal cases. She has a wealth of experience including cases involving serious violence, serious sexual offences and drug supply. Many of the cases Jessica deals with involve young and vulnerable people. Her down to earth approach enables her to reassure defendants and bring out the best in them at trial particularly when representing those who are inexperienced or have additional needs. She also regularly cross examines young and vulnerable witnesses in line with the appropriate tool kits which are now used in all courts. She is now very experienced in the pre-recorded cross examination of young and vulnerable witnesses at Leeds Crown Court as part of the national pilot scheme of the provisions of section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA). Jessica is a very able advocate and is known for fighting hard for those she represents both in court and during negotiations. With a thorough grasp of the law she gives sound, comprehensible legal advice. She is hardworking and believes in thorough case preparation. She provides an early written advice in all appropriate cases and deals with applications and other paperwork promptly. She also accepts instructions from the Probation Trust and from local authorities. Crime R v F - Rape Representing a defendant in relation to historical charges of rape against his then wife, when he was a village vicar. Acquitted of all counts after a five day trial. R v H - Rape Representing a young man accused of rape following a night out with friends, where he and others then went to the complainant’s house. Acquitted following a five day trial. R v M - Rape Representation of a man accused of rape and other sexual offences against his seven year old step daughter. Cross examination of the child was pre-recorded in line with section 28 YJCEA. The defendant was acquitted on all counts after trial.

Joe Culley

Joe Culley has established a busy criminal practice on the North Eastern Circuit. Called in 2010, Joe developed five years’ experience of Civil Advocacy in County Court proceedings. Joe also has experienced in Local Government having been an elected member of Middlesbrough Borough Council between 2015 and 2016. As a Councillor, in addition to assisting local residents with a variety of issues and speaking at public and private meetings, Joe was elected to Chair the Standards Committee and was also a member of the Overview and Scrutiny Board and a Trustee of the Teesside Pension Fund. Joe left his position with the Council having accepted an in-house pupillage with the Crown Prosecution Service in Leeds in the Spring of 2016, under the supervision of a Principal Crown Advocate. On successful completion of pupillage, he was employed as a Crown Prosecutor based in North Yorkshire. Joe is a Level 3 CPS Prosecutor and is routinely instructed to appear in contested cases in the Crown Court. Joe also accepts instructions in civil proceedings. Joe regularly prosecutes and defends in serious criminal cases in the Crown Court. He is a member of the CPS General Crime Panel at Grade 3. Joe remains available for instruction in simple civil proceedings, drawing upon his substantial experience prior to pupillage. Since joining Chambers in January 2018 Joe has continued to undertake civil cases on behalf of Claimants and Defendants. He regularly appears on both the Fast Track and the Small Claims Track. Crime R v M, Teesside Crown Court (Sep 2023) - S.18. Prosecuting at trial a case concerning allegations of s.18 GBH and witness intimidation in which the injury resulting to the complainant, whilst accepted to be very serious, was not that directly intended by the Defendant. Significant factual dispute existed between the parties. Conviction after trial and the Defendant sentenced to 5 years, 8 months. R v R, Newcastle Crown Court (Jul 2023) - Robbery. Defending in a difficult case in which the Defendant was unattractive to a jury: admitting to heavy intoxication at the time of the allegation of violent robbery in a dwelling, and with a number of previous convictions for serious violence. Cross-examination of the complainant’s social worker established that she had not seen or noted injuries to him on a date between the alleged incident and first disclosure. Acquittal after trial. R v F & F, Newcastle Crown Court (Apr 2023) - Burglary. Appearing for the Prosecution. The two Defendants faced a 30-count indictment concerning a spree of ‘2 in 1’ dwelling burglaries in the Newcastle area. Despite presentational challenges arising from a complex nexus of evidence (deriving from cell sites, text messages, PACE identifications, forensics, and circumstantial evidence) acceptable guilty pleas were eventually forthcoming towards the conclusion of the trial. The Defendants were later sentenced to 10 years, 8 months and 8 years, 4 months respectively. Civil W v West Bay Insurance Ltd, Newcastle County Court (Feb 2023). Defending in a Fast Track claim for PSLA and credit hire charges, issued for over £18,000. Both parties had been taxi drivers at the time of a collision and liability was resolved by the court in favour of the Claimant. The Claimant had entered into hire agreement having been instructed to do so by his employer. Cross-examination of the Claimant on the issue of need for hire established that he had never even seen, let alone used, the vehicle hired to him having been given a replacement vehicle by his employer immediately after the collision. Whilst the Claimant was found to have a valid need for a replacement vehicle, as that need had been met by his employer there was no need for him to incur the considerable credit hire charges and this head of claim was refused in its entirety. S v Tesco Underwriting, York County Court (May 2021). Appearing for the Claimant in a Fast Track claim for damages in relation to personal injuries arising from a road traffic collision. Despite the Claimant being cross-examined at length and the Defence advancing an argument that the claim is fundamentally dishonest this is rejected by the court, awarding in excess of £2,000 damages and making criticisms in its judgment of the manner in which the case was defended. M & A v Energy Save North-West Ltd, Manchester County Court (April 2021). Appearing for the Claimants at disposal hearing, judgment is obtained for the Claimants in excess of £42,000 for losses arising from the negligent installation of cavity wall insulation in a residential property.

John Hobley

John Hobley has established a practice in criminal, family and regulatory work. His family practice spans both public and private Children Act cases as well as domestic abuse and financial disputes. In the Crown Court John both prosecutes and defends and undertakes work involving serious violence, drugs, and high value burglary and theft. John joined chambers in 2017, following the completion of a pupillage supervised by Lee Fish. Crime John regularly appears in the Crown Court, both prosecuting and defending. His Crown Court work has involved serious violence, drugs, and high value burglary and theft matters. John also regularly appears in Proceeds of Crime Act proceedings. John has experience of managing both vulnerable and expert witnesses, as well as marshalling telephone, cell site, and other evidence to his clients’ advantage. John has also appeared in private prosecutions involving Trading Standards and on behalf of local authorities in environmental protection cases, and has experience of prosecuting on behalf of the Home Office. Family John has experience of both private and public family work, including Children Act and Family Law Act proceedings on behalf of applicants and respondents in the County Court and High Court. John frequently represents clients at both finding of fact and contested final hearings. These cases have frequently involved complex allegations of domestic violence and abuse of children. John also has experience of cases involving matrimonial finance. John’s work often includes assisting clients with learning difficulties and past and current mental health struggles and he is well equipped to assist all clients in the preparation of their cases, and presenting their best case. Regulatory John has undertaken a secondment at the Care Quality Commission in the Litigation, Prosecution and Inquests team. His work included reviewing evidence collected by CQC inspectors and providing advice on potential breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Many of these alleged breaches involved neglect, or systemic failures, in the provision of care to vulnerable adults, often having resulted in serious injury or death. Following this secondment, John continues to provide advice to the CQC on the merits of potential prosecutions. John is also instructed in cases brought by Social Work England in their role as the regulator for social workers. John has assisted in case preparation and advice, as well as interim and final hearings before adjudication panels.

Lee Fish

Lee Fish is recommended in the leading directories as “an exceptional barrister” who is “very bright and very able”. Lee’s practice covers the whole spectrum of criminal cases. In recent years he has developed notable expertise in the prosecution and defence of those accused of rape and other serious sexual offences. He is trusted with the most serious of cases which resulted in him being appointed to CPS Serious Crime Panel and Rape and Serious Sexual Offence panel at Grade 4. Lee has also considerable experience in the prosecution of regulatory offences. He has notable experience in relation to environmental offending. He has been described as a “true environmental law practitioner”. He has also been instructed by the Health and Safety Executive. His level of expertise has resulted in him being placed on List A of the list of specialist regulatory counsel. In the last few years Lee has developed a considerable practice in the field of professional discipline. Lee is regularly instructed to represent the General Medical Council when it is alleged that a doctor’s fitness to practise is impaired by virtue of misconduct. Lee has dealt with a variety of cases including a psychiatrist who provided flawed expert evidence in a murder trial, dishonesty regarding qualifications and experience, sexual harassment and sexually motivated conduct. The experience that Lee has is transferrable to other professionals who are appearing before their regulator. Lee has also advised the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Crime R v IT - Prosecution of man who sexually abused his step-son, step-daughter and his step-son’s friend. This was sexually offending of the utmost gravity. One of the complainant’s disclosed whilst the proceedings were ongoing. This was successfully managed and defendant was convicted. Difficult issues in relation to bad character and s.41. R v PA - Prosecution of man for raping two separate partners. Also subjected them to domestic abuse and blackmail. Some of the offending was filmed. This case was challenging as the defendant chose to represent himself. Convicted on all counts and sentenced to life imprisonment. R v C - Defence of lead defendant who organised multiple criminal conspiracies from prison. It was also alleged that he had attempted to interfere with witnesses in an ongoing case. Defendant was acquitted of perverting the course of justice. Environmental Law R v HM Property Solutions & Hornsby - Prosecution of company and its director. Open cast mine that caused pollution to Hartley Burn in Haltwhistle. R v Coates and others - Prosecution of a number defendants including 3 limited companies for unlawful depositing of waste at two separate sites. At one of the sites the waste was stored in such a way as to be potentially harmful to human health. Issues in relation to the duty of care requirements. R v M - Defence of company and its director for serious environmental offences arsing out of water discharge activities and the spreading of hazardous waste on land. Health & Safety R v PN - Instructed by the Health and Safety Executive to prosecute a farmer following the electrocution of one of his workers who died as a result of his injuries. R v NM - Instructed by Health and Safety Executive to prosecute plumber who was undertaking gas work without qualifications. This included the issuing of gas safety certificates. R v PB - Instructed by the Health and Safety Executive in the prosecution of a construction site supervisor following a fall from height resulting in catastrophic injuries to a worker at the site who was left in a tetraplegic condition. Other Regulatory R v S and others - Instructed by the Marine Management Organisation in a test case, where it was argued that the prosecution was an abuse of process due to the way in which fishing quota is allocated and managed in the UK. Involved significant disclosure issues and matters of EU and domestic law. Judge found for the Crown at first instance. This was upheld by the Court of Appeal. R v WSL - Prosecution by the Food Standards Agency of an abattoir for breaches of regulations relating to the removal of specified risk material from carcasses. Advice was provided prior to proceedings commencing. R v IS - 2 separate prosecutions by the Food Standards Agency of a dairy owner, for breaching hygiene regulations. Inquests RE MB - Represented the Environment Agency at Inquest in to the death of a man during the floods in Hull in Summer 2007. Deceased drowned after his foot became caught in a drain, which the Environment Agency was charged with maintaining. RE RR - Represented the family of the deceased when their daughter, a serving prisoner, committed suicide by setting herself on fire in her cell. RE X - Represented the family of the deceased following a death at work. Inquest focused upon issues about the fitting of a safe in the back of a security van, which caused a crushing injury resulting in death. Professional Discipline Dr G - Represented GMC. Oncoplastic Surgeon. Multiple failures alleged in the procedure in relation to the mastectomies and breast reconstruction. Dr M - Represented GMC. Psychiatrist who gave flawed evidence in a murder trial in relation to defence of diminished responsibility. Dr S - Represented GMC. Multiple findings of dishonesty in relation to qualifications and level of experience.

Marte Alnaes

Marte Alnaes accepts instructions in a wide range of areas, including Crime, Regulatory, Civil and Family. Marte completed her pupillage under the supervision of Chloe Fairley, during which she experienced a wide range of work and practice areas such as Crime, Family and the GMC. She has since built on that experience and now has a busy practice frequently dealing with factually complicated cases involving complex areas of law. Marte takes pride in her approachability, building rapport with her clients. She focuses on putting them at ease during all stages of the court proceedings. Marte is originally from Norway and as such is fluent in most of the Scandinavian languages. She has a particular interest in languages and studied German in school and at college and completed a semester of Portuguese while she studied for her LLB. Crime Marte defends and prosecutes in trials concerning serious violence, drugs offences, acquisitive crime, domestic violence, harassment and sexual offences. She also undertakes the full range of interlocutory work involved in such proceedings. Civil Marte frequently represents those involved in civil litigation arising out of road traffic accidents where either or both liability and quantum have been in dispute. She has a proven track record of dealing with credit-hire cases and also a growing bank of knowledge and experience of claims concerning breach of contract. Marte has experience of both small claims and fast-track proceedings and has provided written advice in a number of different types of proceedings. Family Marte regularly accepts instructions in applications for non-molestation orders and child arrangements orders. Her experience of family litigation involves both written work and court appearances. She was recently instructed by Durham County Council in a lengthy public law case, and is used to handling cases involving large amounts of papers and complicated factual backgrounds. Regulatory Marte has an emerging practice in Regulatory Law having been, by way of example, recently instructed by Scarborough Borough Council to represent their interests in the Crown Court in respect of enforcement proceedings being brought in respect of multiple breaches of the selective licencing regulations. Marte is also regularly instructed by Social Work England, the regulatory body for social workers. She appears both in interim hearings and in the substantial final hearings and frequently assists in drafting of documents and advising on the law, procedure and the factual strength of cases.

Maryam Ahmad

Maryam Ahmad is developing a strong criminal, regulatory and family law practice and building a reputation as a thorough and determined advocate. Maryam joined Chambers following the completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Chloe Hudson and Jeremy Barton. Prior to commencing pupillage at New Park Court Chambers, Maryam was employed by Ison Harrison Solicitors to work on the Hillsborough Inquests. She also completed an internship in environmental law and women’s rights at the Legal Resources Centre and the Women’s Legal Centre in Cape Town, South Africa. Crime Maryam is regularly instructed to prosecute and defend in the Crown Court, Youth Court and Magistrates’ Court in a wide range of cases including violence, sexual offences, drugs and driving offences. She has experience of dealing with cases involving expert evidence and vulnerable clients and witnesses. Regulatory Maryam developed her practice in regulation following a secondment with the Care Quality Commission where she reviewed evidence and advised on potential breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Maryam usually provided advice at the pre-charge stage and was requested to assist where cases had failed to progress due to earlier investigative decisions. She is now regularly instructed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council in applications for interim suspension orders and conditions of practice. Inquests Maryam represents bereaved families at inquests. She has recently been instructed on behalf of the families of adults and children who had been involved with NHS mental health services. Her experience in regulation has been a particular asset in inquests concerning medical-related deaths. Maryam is happy to accept instructions on behalf of organisations and will also represent families pro bono in appropriate cases. Family Maryam accepts instructions in private family law proceedings for non-molestation orders, occupation orders and child arrangements orders. She is regularly instructed for findings of fact and contested final hearings. Maryam has recently been instructed in cases involving increasingly serious allegations including violence and sexual abuse. Civil Maryam represents Claimants and Defendants in a range of civil matters including road traffic accidents, personal injury and credit hire disputes. In addition to conducting trials, Maryam is also frequently instructed for case management conferences, applications for interim injunctions and stage 3 hearings. She regularly undertakes written advisory work on liability and quantum for personal injury damages.

Matthew Donkin

Matthew Donkin is trusted to conduct cases of gravity and complexity, and is recognised for his ability to manage demanding evidence and legal issues. Crime Having developed a strong reputation for defending and prosecuting cases of general crime, Matthew is now typically instructed in cases of homicide and serious organised crime. Matthew has particular experience and interest in cases involving complex medical evidence. As well as conducting cases alone, he has a long history of acting as a leading junior and of being led by King’s Counsel. Homicide & Serious Violence R v Asgar Sheikh, Khalid Sheikh, Shabnam Sheikh, Shagufa Sheikh and Sakalayne Sheikh R v Darren Jacques. R v JP R v KR and ME R v PM - Murder. Leeds Crown Court R v Keith Hall - Manslaughter. Teesside Crown Court R v Jamie Gray - Attempted Murder R v Jonathan Garner and Samantha Gregson - Murder Serious & Organised Crime R v MH and others - Operation Florida Operation Elba – 1, 2 and 3. R v Roemol Taylor and Others R v Conroy, Appleby and others – Operation Eton 2 R v AB - Operations Haymarket and Sidra 2. Serious Sexual Offences R v WO R v NS R v Mohammed Ghani R v DW R v TB Fraud, Financial Crime, Confiscation & Asociated Cases R v Jaspreet Oberoi, Ricky Collins & Others - Operation Ultimatum R v Pilling & Best R v Colin Nesbitt R v CK & Others R v Roman Rafael & Others Inquests & Inquiries Matthew accepts instructions to appear in Inquests and has done so in cases concerning fatal traffic accidents and police misconduct. Inquest into the death of Irene Collins. Matthew represented the family of the deceased who had allowed the police access to her property to carry out a search with a dog, but the police dog then attacked and savaged the deceased. The case attracted national media attention. Regulatory Matthew accepts instructions to represent diverse parties in a broad range of regulatory proceedings.

Michael Brady KC

Since taking Silk in March 2020 Michael has been instructed to both prosecute and defend in a number of high-profile murder cases, including R v Skana a case that concerned the killing of a 7-year old girl in a park in Bolton. This case, as with a number of other cases in which Michael has been instructed, involved complex considerations of the defendant’s mental illness. Other cases such as R v Rowen, a case where the defendant decapitated his cousin with an axe, have caused Michael’s reputation in Silk to become quickly established. Michael accepts private work and has successfully represented a number of defendants on this basis. Equally comfortable defending or prosecuting, Michael has an approachable and down to earth manner enabling him to communicate with clients and juries alike such that the real issues are identified with concision and clarity. Away from the court room Michael has been asked to, and is in the process of establishing the Northern Circuit Chapter of the Kalisher Trust. This well-renowned Trust aims to help bright youngsters from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve their potential through advocacy and to help those with the requisite ability and ambition to develop careers as barristers at the criminal bar. Michael also practises from 18 St. John Street Chambers, Manchester and looks forward to expanding his practice nationwide.

Natalia Escoriza

Natalia Escoriza specialises in family law and undertakes all aspects of family work. Following her MSc in Social and Political Theory at Edinburgh University and a period of postgraduate tutoring and research, Natalia turned to law and was called to the Bar in 2002. In 2012, Natalia was appointed as a member of the Calderdale Education Appeals Panel, and is a qualified civil and commercial mediator. Public Law Natalia undertakes a significant amount of public law work, which includes physical and sexual abuse of children, mental health issues, drug and alcohol abuse, Special Guardianship applications and adoption representing all parties at all levels of proceedings, and deals with applications including those for: Adoption Care Orders Supervision Orders Special Guardianship Placement Revocation of Public Law Orders S19(14) Orders Designation of Appropriate Local Authority Natalia’s calm approach and detailed preparation make her very popular with solicitors representing disadvantaged clients. Private Law Natalia’s practice covers all aspects of private law children work, including the following: Applications for Child Arrangement Orders Prohibited Steps and Specific Issue Applications Parental Responsibility Applications Schedule 1 Children Act Applications Cases where the children are separately represented Removal from the jurisdiction Cases involving applications to the International Child Abduction Unit for return of children from outside the jurisdiction. Cases with a “foreign element”. In both public and private law, she has extensive experience of dealing with cases involving the following: Allegations of physical, sexual and emotional abuse Allegations of domestic violence Complicated findings of fact hearings with multiple potential perpetrators One or more party with mental health issues One or more party with drug and alcohol abuse issues Parties who are from outside of the jurisdiction Parties who do not have English as a first language and require an interpreter. Financial Remedy In addition to children work, represents clients in mainly small and medium-sized money cases, covering all stages of financial remedy proceedings, from first appointment through to final hearing, including interim applications for financial provision. Injunctive Proceedings All areas of injunctive work are undertaken, including applications for: Non-Molestation Orders Occupation Orders Court of Protection Natalia accepts instructions in Court of Protection matters. Birmingham City Council v R [2007] 1 FLR 564. Assisted Michael Harrison KC during his involvement with this case in the interim stages, and represented the Local Authority at an interim directions hearing. Re AZ (Child) (Relocation to Poland) [2016] EWFC 8. Application to permanently remove child from the jurisdiction. Consideration of principles in Re F, and the need for CAFCASS to conduct a sufficiently balanced (‘holistic’) welfare analysis when addressing issues in respect of relocation.

Neil Jones

Neil Jones initially had a private practice in Newcastle, then 32 years as military lawyer. US Army JAG School 1989. RCDS 2008. MA Kings College ‘International Relations ‘2008. MOD 2009. Retired as DDSP in rank of Brigadier 2013. Resumed his private practice at New Park Court Chambers in crime. Experience primarily in the military justice system. Established criminal advocate in the Service Courts setting Employment law expertise and adviser at Army and Navy Board level International and humanitarian law adviser in Ministry of Defence Current President of Westbury selection process for lawyers entering the Army Settled key indictments in high profile cases, e.g. Baha Mousa. Co-architect of the superintending rôle of the Attorney General in Service prosecution decisions. Voluntary applicant for redundancy from the post of Deputy Director Service Prosecutions. Due release from Service December 2013. Responsible for directing and managing a team of tri-service lawyers, both solicitors and barristers, in the preparation and conduct of all Service prosecutions. Frequent appearances for the Crown at first instance in the most serious court martial trials, with extensive experience in criminal evidence and procedure. Cases of the utmost gravity including rape, manslaughter and attempted murder conducted as senior prosecutor. Management responsibility for the legal training and professional development of thirty Service lawyers.

Nicholas Lumley KC

Nicholas Lumley KC is a specialist criminal and regulatory law advocate. His expertise covers cases involving homicide, serious fraud, drug trafficking, human trafficking and exploitation, tax evasion and money laundering, professional misconduct and judicial review. Rape and serious sexual offences. He is often instructed on a private basis. Medico-legal cases and ‘Baby-shaking’ cases are also his forte. Those whom he leads, is instructed by and represents commend his meticulous preparation, his ‘eye for detail’ and ‘reading of the case, client and witness, not just the case papers.’ He is regarded as a ‘hands-on silk that goes the extra mile researching the foreign, unusual and bizarre to get to the understanding of his client’s case’. He ‘instils immediate confidence’ and is a ‘remarkable leader’. He has an incredibly persuasive advocacy style which readily ‘engages the jury, turning the complex into common sense and the novel into normal.’ He is described as an ‘elegant and charming performer’ who unfalteringly remains ‘calm, composed and reassuring’ in what often present as the most trying of circumstances. Nick regularly accepts instructions on a private fee basis. Recent cases have involved the successful private defence of professional rugby player (England and Newcastle Falcons) charged with rape having met via Tinder; the defence of a business man charged with historic sexual abuse; the defence of a publican charged with multiple rapes of partners; the defence of a businessman facing trial at The Central Criminal Court on charges of VAT fraud; the defence of a company director charged with assault. Crime R v K (2016). Successful private defence of professional rugby player (England and Newcastle Falcons) charged with rape having met via Tinder. Issues of consent, reasonable belief in consent, admissibility of sexual history of complainant. R v J (2016). Successful private defence of businessman charged with cultivating cannabis, defence of medical necessity. R v M (2016). Private defence of internet child grooming, issues of entrapment by vigilante group. Administrative Court & Judicial Review Nick has appeared on behalf of the General Medical Council before the High Court in numerous applications to extended interim restrictions on Doctors’ practices. Dr S (2013). Appeal against the conclusions of the interim orders panel of the MPTS. Dr A (2013). Permission hearing and full Judicial Review hearing concerning the interpretation of regulations governing Dr’s fitness to practice. Regulatory Nick regularly appears before the fitness to practice panel of the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service. Nick also has recent experience of representing sports professionals and bookmakers, before the Crown Court and the Court of Appeal. GMC v Professor H. Fitness to practice, fraudulent research in pancreatic cancer, to obtain grants from pharmaceutical companies and for publication in leading medical journals. GMC v Dr O. Fitness to practice, deception and fraudulent prescribing. GMC v Dr M. Appeal by Dr suffering from long-standing delusional and schizophrenic conditions. Licensing Nick has recently represented the likes of Tesco PLC in liquor licensing applications and has recent experience of firearms appeals. Inquests Nick has experience of representing companies, insurance companies and individuals at inquests.

Nicholas de la Poer KC

Nicholas de la Poer KC specialises in criminal law and regulatory work. He is described as “a good operator” and “phenomenal barrister”. Since September 2020, Nick has been committed to the oral evidence hearings of the Manchester Arena Inquiry as part of the Counsel to the Inquiry team. And for the majority of 2018 Nick was instructed by Addleshaw Goddard to attend the Grenfell Tower Inquiry into the deaths of 72 people on 14th June 2017. Between 2015 and 2020, as a junior, Nick was instructed in a significant number of cases involving crimes of homicide or in which fatalities had occurred. These include murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to murder and manslaughter, as well as cases involving deaths which were said to have been caused by breaches of the health and safety legislation. Crime Nick prosecutes and defends. As a junior he held the highest grade of CPS instructed advocate, Grade 4, qualifying him to prosecute the most serious cases in the Crown Court. He also appeared on the Crown Prosecution Service’s specialist fraud list, specialist proceeds of crime list and specialist counter-terrorism list. He has experience of being involved in the most serious cases in the criminal canon including murder, manslaughter, rape and serious sexual assault, fraud and money laundering involving sums in excess of £1 million, drug trafficking, people trafficking, kidnap and blackmail. Within the criminal law Nick has a particular interest in fraud and proceeds of crime cases. He has been described as “one of the few genuine confiscation experts on Circuit” (Legal 500 2012). Nick is regularly instructed in cases post-conviction to consider appeals against conviction and sentence, post-conviction to deal with proceeds of crime and post confiscation order to consider appeal and/or variation. Regulatory Criminal Nick’s interest in regulatory matters has led to him being instructed both for the prosecution and the defence in the Crown Court in cases involving fatalities in the workplace. He has had experience of being instructed to prosecute and to defend cases involving local authorities, the Health and Safety Executive and the Environment Agency. He also receives instructions in cases involving landlord obligations, waste disposal and fire safety. During 2020 and 2021 Nick continued to undertake advisory work in relation to companies under investigation within the fire safety and waste disposal regulatory regimes. Regulatory Professional Nick has also appeared before the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal and has been approved for Fitness to Practise work for many years. His work in the MPT has provided him with extensive opportunity to be involved in cases involving medical experts. Nick has experience of the Solicitor’s Disciplinary Tribunal. He has appeared in an appeal from the SDT to the High Court. Nick has experience of representing police officers in misconduct proceedings. Nick also has experience of representing a member of the British Association of Counsellors and Psychotherapists (BACP). Public Inquiries / Inquests Nick is instructed in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry for one of the Core Participants: tRIIO. He is being led by Paul Greaney KC. His role required him to attend on every sitting day during Phase 1 of the Inquiry, which has occupied the majority of 2018. tRIIO was also directly involved in the evidence during Module 3 of Phase 2. From September 2019 Nick was part of the Counsel to the Inquiry team for the Manchester Arena Inquiry. The Inquiry is investigating the circumstances of the terrorist attack on 22nd May 2017 which killed 22 people. As part of this role Nick has called a large number of witnesses and participated in related High Court work. Nick conducted the interview of the convicted terrorist, Hashem Abedi, in which Hashem Abedi confessed to participation in the bombing. The Manchester Arena Inquiry is investigating a broad range of areas. These include: counter-terrorism policing and the work of the Security Service; emergency response to a terrorist incident; security at private venues; and, radicalisation into Islamist Extremism. Nick’s role has required him to play a significant part in the preparation, marshalling and calling of evidence in all of these areas. Nick also accepts instructions to represent interested persons in inquests and has experience of Article 2 compliant proceedings. He was instructed to provide advice to a person concerned with becoming an Interested Party in the third of the Deep Cut Inquests. Court of Appeal, Criminal Division Nick has experience of successful appeals against conviction, sentence and confiscation orders in front of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division. Nick also has experience of responding to terminating ruling appeals and an application to quash an acquittal. High Court Nick has also been instructed to conduct judicial reviews and appeals by way of case stated to the High Court. Nick also has experience of the procedure under s.36 of the Inquiries Act 2005.

Nicholas Mason

Nicholas Mason is an experienced barrister, with extensive experience in a wide variety of complex, serious and multi-disciplinary claims. Professional Negligence Encompassing the medical professions, accountants, financial advisers, surveyors, architects, solicitors and barristers (including QC). Often these claims form part of wider commercial / civil claims or involve more than one profession or involve regulatory issues. Trial of complex medical negligence claim relating to cosmetic surgery against leading counsel. Claim against a solicitor where the latter’s Defence was that he had properly advised and discharged his retainer with the Claimant and produced a complete set of file notes and letters evincing this. The Claimant’s case whether these had been subsequently produced. Regulatory Advising and representing a number of professions and occupations in relation to disciplinary proceedings and at disciplinary tribunals, in particular solicitors, accountants, financial advisers and policemen. Advising and representing two solicitors in an application made by an insurance company to have them, together with a doctor and a claims manager, committed to prison for contempt of court. The application concerned alleged false statements made in relation to a personal injury claim. Instructed by the Attorney General and Treasury Solicitor as independent counsel to monitor and review interventions in and searches of firms of solicitors and accountants by HM Revenue & Customs and other law enforcement agencies. Advising and representing directors in relation to director disqualification proceedings. Advised local authorities, including upon the formulation of ‘charges’, in respect of internal disciplinary proceedings. Commercial Extensive experience, both as an advocate and in an advisory capacity of a wide variety of complex, serious and multidisciplinary commercial claims. In addition to litigious work, undertaken a substantial amount of advisory work and the drafting of commercial documents – eg terms and conditions of businesses, including those for a national loyalty reward scheme for small and medium size retailers, and competitive tendering agreements for local authorities. Acting on behalf of directors and administrators in respect of claims arising out of director’s breaches of fiduciary duty and fraud. For a 2 year period acted as leading junior for the managing director of a multinational furniture manufacturer and retailer in proceedings alleging widespread breaches of duty and fraud over a substantial period. The case also included claims against other directors with whom there were conflicts of interest and against both the company’s solicitors and accountants in respect of their failure to discover these activities. Presently acting on behalf of a leading provincial firm of solicitors in litigation involving twenty Defendants relating to Solicitor Management Agreements, loan agreements and after the event insurance policies in large-scale personal injury litigation. Acting on behalf of leading sporting agency in claim for breach of contract against the captain of premier league football team. Advising and representing partnerships and former partners, in particular solicitors, accountants, doctors and dentists. Recently advised a national firm of commercial solicitors on potential conflicts of interest and breach of confidentiality issues arising out of their acquisition of another major firm of solicitors that had gone into administration. Instructed on behalf of the Legal Services Commission – replacing a QC – in proceedings brought against a former solicitor involving policy issues. An interesting case involved the right of a bank to exercise a lien over a Raphael painting (estimated value £25-£30 million) that had been deposited at a bank for safety reasons. Often instructed in cases involving a number of these areas of law and/or claims of professional negligence. Personal Injury In excess of 20 years experience of personal injury litigation, acting on behalf of both Claimants and Defendants in a wide spectrum of claims, including a number of cases that have resulted in multi-million pound awards or settlements. Claims involving complex financial, medical and technical issues. Tetraplegic and paraplegic claims. Catastrophic injuries to the brain and spine. Fatal accident claims. Paediatric claims. Industrial disease cases, including mesotheilioma. Psychological injuries, including nervous shock and stress at work. Product liability claims. Acting on behalf of trade unions in group actions. Acting for government departments. CICA claims. In addition to experience in litigating claims, substantial experience in resolving claims through mediation and ’round table conferences’, including against leading counsel. Linked to personal injury practice, extensive experience of: Clinical negligence cases relating to the treatment of personal injuries. Solicitor/barrister negligence claims arising out of their conduct of personal injury claims. Health and safety prosecutions, including those involving fatalities. Construction Involved in a wide variety of construction disputes, including those involving professional negligence, ranging from single dwelling disputes to a claim of some £8 million, representing the owners of 26 houses who bought ‘executive homes’ from a national builder that had been built using an incorrect mix of mortar. Trademark High profile dispute in the High Court between the members of the internationally known 60’s and 70’s pop group ‘The Hollies’ as to who was entitled to use the name and derive royalties therefrom. Claim concerning patents and licensing rights to hydration system fitted to safety vests/jackets supplied nationally to the police and fire services. Defamation In particular in relation to companies, partnerships and the internet. Instructed on behalf of acclaimed rap artist in claim against senior officer in Metropolitan Police. Represented a national chain of jewellers and their chairman in one of the first internet libels. Licensing Instructed on behalf of applicants, police forces, local authorities and justices. Involved in high profile applications involving national chains and sporting venues. Acted for a nationally known Leeds nightclub in judicial review proceedings in the High Court and Court of Appeal. Land Law Extensive experience, both as an advocate and in an advisory capacity, of claims relating to the sale of land, trespass, adverse possession, easements, restrictive covenants and licences, encompassing the conduct and presentation of cases before the High Court, County Court, Land Appeal Tribunal and Land Registry. Instructed on behalf of individuals, companies, local authorities and government agencies. Landlord & Tenant Specialises in claims that have a land law element, including mortgages and professional negligence claims against solicitors, surveyors and land agents. Also undertakes related fields of practice, such as town and country planning and environmental law. Trusts, Wills & Probate Undertakes both contentious and non-contentious work, although the emphasis is weighted towards litigation. Practice encompasses: Drafting wills, trusts and deeds of variation. Advising and conducting claims relating to the construction and validity of wills and trusts. Claims involving undue influence and fraud. Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975. Beneficial ownership claims involving constructive and resulting trusts and claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Matrimonial Nicholas undertakes all types of financial remedy proceedings. He particularly specialises in cases involving companies, trusts and concealed and dissipated assets where he brings his substantial knowledge and experience of chancery, company and commercial law to bare. Nicholas frequently represents high net worth individuals including businessman in many different fields, in particular property and finance, generational estates and farming and the professions, in particular solicitors, accountants and estate agents. He also frequently represents the spouses of such individuals, particularly, in cases where there is believed to be material nondisclosure and the transfer and dissipation of assets. Not infrequently these cases involve the tracing of assets and jurisdictional and cross-border issues. His experience of international civil frauds and commercial disputes provide him with a valuable insight into these types of cases. In addition to conducting financial remedy proceedings in their entirety, he is also instructed to provide specialist advice in relation to company or trust aspects of a case, i.e. where there is an issue as to ownership of assets vis-à-vis a company or a trust. He is not only instructed by the parties to the marriage but is frequently instructed by companies, relatives and others who intervene in proceedings relating to third-party interests and claims. These claims take a multitude of forms including, ownership of assets, beneficial interests, estoppel licences and loans and charges. Nicholas brings to all of these cases a wealth of experience, a highly analytical mind and skilled and determined cross examination. He particularly enjoys difficult and unusual cases. An example of such is his recent instruction by a consultant in a case where the latter is raising conduct on the basis of his former wife making false allegations of rape and sexual abuse upon a child of the family. Nicholas is not only involved in the financial consequences of divorce in respect of financial remedy proceedings, but also drafts both prenuptial and post nuptial agreements. Nicholas not only drafts bespoke agreements he also drafts all the ancillary documentation. He has drafted agreements for businessmen, in particular in property and the hospitality industry, professionals, in particular solicitors and accountants where not only the client but also their fellow partners are anxious that the firm should not be adversely affected by divorce or the potential of divorce. He was recently instructed to draft a prenuptial agreement for a leading world sportsman — the runner up in a major world motorsport championship. Nicholas not only drafts all the documentation but provides advice and guidance throughout the process, including pre-marriage advice. Again, linked to his chancery and commercial practice, Nicholas provides advice and representation in relation to all aspects of cohabitees disputes relating to ownership of property and interests therein including trusts of land, resulting and constructive trust, estoppel licences and Inheritance Act claims. To assist his Instructing Solicitors, Nicholas provides bespoke lectures and seminars upon those areas of practice outlined above. Local Authorities Instructed by a number of local authorities in relation to such diverse matters as landlord and tenant, planning, licensing and judicial review. Again the work is not solely litigation based. Drafted documents, relating to such matters as the allocation of houses, the provision of care and competitive tendering, and advised upon policy matters such as the legality of housing allocation schemes, disability discrimination and the refusal of the Crown Prosecution Service to disclose evidence required for possession claims prior to the completion of criminal proceedings. Appellate Work In addition to the above cases reported in various law reports has extensive experience of undertaking appeals, including cases where did not appear at first instance, in the various divisions of the High Court, including the Administrative Court and the Divisional Court By Way of Case Stated, and the Court of Appeal.

Nick Cartmell

Nick Cartmell is a senior criminal practitioner, specialising in defending serious crime. Nick is a member of the Criminal Bar Association and has been an associate member of the American Bar Association since 1990. During the course of a long career Nick has been a finalist in two World Debating Finals, been a guest lecturer in advocacy on bar finals courses at Northumbria University and still spends some his free time judging moots, mock trials and debating competitions. Nick’s practice embraces offences across both the regulatory and full criminal calendar – whether the same is licensing appeals within the sport or taxi industry or serious offences before the Crown Court and Court of Appeal. Serious Sexual Assault/ Rape/ Historic Abuse R v. JA - Nick secured the acquittal of a 30 year old man charged with Rape and Sexual Assault by penetration, alleged to have been a predator, who was said to have abducted a 15 year old girl late at night and assaulted her in the back of his car. Issues were consent and belief in age. [Newcastle Crown Court] Operation Sanctuary: R v. K; R v. I, R v. R - Nick appeared in three separate Sanctuary Trials dealing with Historic Sexual Abuse/Rape and grooming securing acquittals for each Defendant on each trial on all Counts [Newcastle Crown Court] Operation Optic: R v. S - Nick secured the acquittal in respect of a Kurdish man charged with historic Rape [Newcastle Crown Court] Serious Offences of Violence R v. T - Nick secured acquittal on all charges of a man accused of stabbing (section 18/attempted murder) another in that others home on the basis of reasonable self-defence [Newcastle Crown Court] R v. S - Nick secured the acquittal of a soldier charged with stabbing (section 18) of two people at a New years Eve Party on the basis of credibility/reasonable self defence [Newcastle Crown Court] R v. W - Nick secured the acquittal of a gypsy charged with Robbery (50,000) and Assault (section 18) with a baseball bat on another caravan owner and his family. [Teesside Crown Court] Serious Offences of Fraud R v. P - Nick secured a suspended sentence for a property developer who pleaded guilty to over 9 million pounds worth of mortgage fraud over a period of 17 years [Newcastle Crown Court] R v. S - Nick secured the acquittal of the Managing Director of a car hire firm charged with more than a 2 million pound fraud and ‘cash for crash’ [Newcastle Crown Court] R v. M - Nick secured the acquittal of a the Manager of 12 local betting shops accused of fraud in excess of 500k, false betting and false accounting [Newcastle Crown Court] Drug Offences & Serious Organised Crime Nick secured the acquittal of an Kurdish man charged with Conspiracy to supply drugs between Liverpool, Manchester, Derby and Teesside [Teesside Crown Court]

Nick Lane

Nick Lane is a busy and highly regarded specialist criminal advocate who regularly appears in the most serious cases including those of murder, serious sexual offences, terrorism, and large-scale conspiracies. Known for being approachable and client focused, Nick has a particular interest in defending vulnerable defendants, be that due to age or mental health issues. Having spent several years serving in the Royal Navy Nick is particularly well placed to defend serving members of the armed forces at Court Martial. Nick is a Grade 3 prosecutor on the Crown Prosecution Services Advocate Panel, and has extensive experience of the disclosure regime in criminal cases, in particular of highly sensitive material, including the authorisation and supervision of covert intelligence sources. Crime R v D (2022) - Newcastle Upon Tyne Crown Court - Nick represented an Albanian national convicted of playing a role in a conspiracy to supply cocaine with a street value of several million pounds. Instructed by Jonathan Cousins of Hay & Kilner Solicitors, Wallsend. R v M (2022) - Newcastle Upon Tyne Crown Court - Nick represented a 15-year-old defendant responsible for the death of another youth. Nick’s client was said to have played a leading role in a group knife attack committed by at least 10 attackers, all of whom were under the age of 18 at the time of the offence. Nick was led by Nicholas Lumley KC and instructed by Heather Bolton of Scanlans Solicitors, Sunderland. R v H (2022) - Newcastle Upon Tyne Crown Court - Nick successfully defended allegations of rape in the context of an intimate relationship. It was the defence case that the complainant had a fantasy about an infamous American serial killer and the alleged criminal behaviour was in fact consensual sexual roleplay. Instructed by Michelle Stonley of Forresters Solicitors, Jarrow.

Nicoleta Alistari

Nicoleta Alistari has a common law practice, with emphasis on crime. She prosecutes and defends in a wide range of cases, including those involving scientific evidence, sensitive disclosure issues and vulnerable witnesses. She is a Grade 3 CPS panel advocate. In her civil practice, she acts for both claimants and defendants in personal injury litigation and is often instructed by local authorities. She has considerable experience of dealing with cases involving allegations of fraud. Crime Nicoleta’s criminal practice consists of both defence and prosecution work in the Magistrates’ and the Crown Court. She has experience of appeals against and sentence in the Crown Court and the Court of Appeal. Successfully defending a case involving allegations of assault on a police officer. Successfully defending against allegations of harassment and opposed the Crown’s application for a restraining order upon acquittal. Prosecuting appeals against conviction and sentence in the Crown Court. Prosecuting in cases involving complex disclosure issues including public interest immunity matters. Appearing in a case involving allegations of assault, which required the examination of child witnesses. Securing an acquittal in a case involving allegations of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice Employment Before coming to the Bar, Nicoleta gained experience in the employment field by working in a solicitors’ firm. She represents both employers and employees and has a particular interest in discrimination law. Nicoleta has been instructed to appear in the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Her experience covers many areas of employment law including: Discrimination Law – Nicoleta has successfully represented claimants in cases involving allegations of direct sex and disability discrimination. She successfully defended claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments for employees on long-term sick leave. Unfair & Wrongful Dismissal – Nicoleta regularly has appeared for both claimants and respondents in cases raising misconduct and capability issues. She has successfully defended allegations of constructive dismissal. TUPE – Nicoleta has recently advised in cases involving the transfer of undertakings where the transferor was subject to administration proceedings at the time of the transfer. Whistleblowing & Victimisation – She has been instructed in cases involving protected disclosures made by employees working the care industry. Personal Injury Nicoleta appears for both claimants and defendants. Her PI practice comprises of small and fast track RTA claims including credit hire cases, claims involving allegations of fraud. She has also been instructed to act in appeals to the county court. Nicoleta undertakes written advisory work on liability and quantum and drafts pleadings. Successfully appeared on behalf of a claimant in a road traffic accident in which the defendant had raised allegations of fraud. Succeeded in arguing that a hire agreement was unenforceable due to the failure by the hire company to serve a cancellation notice within the meaning of the Cancellation of Contracts Made in a Consumer’s Home or Place of Work etc Regulations 2008. Succeeded in an application to set aside a default judgment a year after it had been entered. Housing Nicoleta has experience in repossession work, mainly for landlords where the tenancies are assured or assured short hold tenancies. She has also dealt with possession orders and the setting aside of warrants of possession on the grounds of abuse of process. She has acted for landlords and tenants in contested possession claims. She has also represented landlords in commercial lettings disputes.

Oliver Connor

Oliver Connor accepts instructions in a number of areas including Crime and Regulatory. Oliver commenced pupillage at New Park Court Chambers in September 2020 under the supervision of Adam Birkby and Geraldine Kelly, affording him the opportunity to observe highly experienced counsel in complex and serious criminal trials. Building on this experience, Oliver regularly appears in both the Magistrates and Crown Court presenting cases which have earned him praise from his clients and the Judiciary alike. Oliver also regularly undertakes LPP review work for governmental organisations such as HMRC and the SFO. Additionally, Oliver is routinely instructed to act on behalf of Social Work England dealing with regulatory matters in fitness to practise hearings. Oliver now accepts instructions in the early stages of such investigations and assists with the drafting of documents and advises in relation to evidential issues and likely sanctions before presenting the cases at final hearings. Oliver continues to develop his practice defending and prosecuting a wide range of offences in both the Magistrates and Crown Court across the North-East. His regulatory practice also continues to grow. Crime R v S - Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (2022). Oliver represented a Defendant at a sentencing hearing following a guilty plea for a s.20 GBH. Following a sentence of immediate imprisonment, Oliver lodged an appeal which was referred to the Full Court by the Registrar. Oliver successfully argued for a reduction and suspension of the custodial term. R v M - Leeds Crown Court (2022). Representing a Defendant in a 2 handed committal for sentence following guilty pleas being entered in relation to multiple counts of handling stolen goods, Oliver was able to persuade the Judge to suspend the inevitable sentence of custody by carefully drawing together the most relevant and persuasive elements of the Defendant’s mitigation. R v B - Newcastle Crown Court (2022). In a trial concerning an offence of dangerous driving, Oliver was successful in persuading the jury that the Defendant’s actions did not amount to dangerous driving and they returned a not guilty verdict in relation to the same. Regulatory Oliver’s regulatory practice continues to grow as he routinely acts on behalf of Social Work England in Fitness to Practise investigations. Such work requires the assimilation and distillation of large volumes of documents collected from third party agencies before advising upon the merits of the case and seeking to acquire further evidence where necessary. In order to do this, Oliver must work closely with his professional client, communicating openly and clearly in order to meet tight deadlines. Due to the sensitive nature of material involved in these cases, Oliver is adept utilising discretion in his review and presentation of the evidence. Additionally, when reviewing evidence Oliver is able to recognise with ease any further redactions that are necessary before communicating these swiftly to those instructing him. SWE v NR - (2022). Oliver presented a case on behalf of Social Work England in relation to the fitness to practise of a Social Worker whose behaviour was found to amount to misconduct. The hearing was held via Microsoft Teams and Oliver was able to manage evidence of four live witnesses before making closing submissions before the panel of adjudicators. The panel was persuaded by Oliver’s arguments and implemented sanctions as per Oliver’s recommendations. SWE v JHW (2022). Presenting the case for an Interim Suspension Order in relation to ongoing fitness to practise investigations against a social worker. Oliver successfully persuaded the Panel to impose the order as per his submissions

Paul Greaney KC

Paul Greaney KC specialises in serious crime, public inquiries and inquests, regulatory crime and professional discipline. For many years he has been recommended in the leading professional directories. In Chambers & Partners 2024, he was recommended in four practice areas: inquests and public inquiries; crime (star individual); financial crime and health and safety. Scope of Practice Public Inquiries (eg. Counsel to the Inquiry at the Manchester Arena Inquiry; counsel to a corporate core participant at the Grenfell Inquiry; counsel to a senior lawyer core participant at the Independent inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse; counsel for the Royal Military Police at the Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan; advising a large corporate organisation in relation to the COVID inquiry); Inquests (eg. counsel for a prominent institutional client at the Hillsborough Inquests; counsel for the family at the Deepcut Inquest; counsel for the family in the Jack Ritchie Inquest (state regulation of the gambling sector); counsel for Manx Care and the DHSC (Isle of Man) in a current inquest; counsel for NHSE in a recent inquest); Serious crime,including financial crime and crime with an international dimension; Regulatory crime, with an emphasis on the healthcare sector; health and safety enforcement; data protection; trading standards issues; environmental health and prosecutions arising out of planning disputes; Disciplinary proceedings, including proceedings before professional sporting bodies, (eg. acted in the Football Association proceedings in the Suarez/Evra racist abuse case and the Anelka “quenelle” case); Warrants and production orders (regularly instructed on behalf of companies and prominent individuals in challenges, eg. acted on behalf of a media organisation on such issues arising out of the phone hacking investigation). Public law, particularly claims relating to inquiries and inquests and the criminal justice system. Public Inquiries & Inquests Current instructions include acting as Counsel (CTI) to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry, acting as leading counsel for the Royal Military Police at the Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan, acting as leading counsel to a corporate core participant at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and advising a large corporate organisation in relation to the COVID Inquiry and the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. Concluded instructions include acting as Counsel (CTI) to the Manchester Arena Inquiry and acting as leading counsel for a senior lawyer core participant at the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. In the world of Inquests, Paul acted as leading counsel for a prominent institutional client at the Hillsborough Inquests, as leading counsel for the family at the Deepcut Inquest, as leading counsel for the family in the Jack Ritchie Inquest (state regulation of the gambling sector) and as leading counsel for Manx Care and the DHSC at a recent inquest on the Isle of Man. Serious Crime Paul continues to maintain a major profile in serious crime and has prosecuted and defended in many cases of national importance. R v Joseph Peers and others [2023]. Prosecution of the murderers of Ashley Dale, an innocent young woman executed in her own home in Liverpool with a machine gun as the result of a gangland feud. Embossed II [2022 – 2023]. Defence of the First Defendant in a major case in which the admissibility of Encrochat data was challenged. R. v D Ltd. [2022]. Defence of company director charged with manslaughter by gross negligence arising out of a workplace death. Regulatory Crime Paul has been involved in many serious and complicated regulatory prosecutions, including cases involving multiple fatalities and complex issues of law and cases involving the risk of significant reputational damage. That has involved defending large private and public bodies and individuals facing allegations. He has particular experience of prosecutions in the healthcare sector (having represented many large private organisations and NHS Trusts in such cases), the workplace sector (having represented large companies and also individual directors) and the data protection context (having represented an international company in a prosecution brought by the ICO). Disciplinary Proceedings Paul represented the Football Association in the proceedings brought against Luis Suarez, the Liverpool player in respect of his racial abuse of Patrice Evra, the Manchester United player [2011], in the proceedings brought against Everton FC in respect of the tapping up of Jamaal Lascelles [2013] and in the proceedings brought against Nicolas Anelka in respect of his use of the quenelle gesture [2014] and Benoit Assou-Ekotto for tweeting his support for Anelka’s gesture [2014]. He has more than 20 years’ experience in representing police officers in misconduct proceedings and has also conducted proceedings in the GMC and SRA. Licensing Paul deals with all forms of licensable activity. Warrants & Production Orders Paul has been instructed on behalf of companies and prominent individuals in challenges. For example, he acted on behalf of a major media organisation on such issues arising out of the phone hacking investigation. Public Law Particularly claims relating to the criminal justice system, police law and coronial law. International Paul has conducted cases in Fiji, including in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Fiji as a temporary member of the Bar of Fiji. He acted on behalf of the former director of a major international company in corruption proceedings in Greece and was admitted to the Bar of Athens for that purpose. He acted on behalf of Manx Care and the DHSC in proceedings in the Isle of Man for which purposes he was granted a temporary advocates licence.

Peter Byrne

Peter Byrne has almost 30 years’ experience of conducting criminal cases before the courts, including the Court of Appeal, ranging from motoring offences to murder. Peter qualified as a solicitor in 2003, prior to his call to the Bar. He has a relaxed and approachable style but with an attention for detail from his involvement in serious and complex criminal cases. Crime Peter is instructed in the following criminal areas: Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape and serious sexual offences, non fatal serious violence, money laundering, robbery and cases involving the importation, production and supply of drugs. Peter has experience of defending and prosecuting in cases where there are arguments regarding fitness to plead and Mental Health Act disposals. Fraud: Missing trader, asset stripping, fraudulent trading, VAT and mortgage fraud. Regulatory Defended in prosecutions by the Environment Agency, Trading Standards, DTI, the Post Office, OFCOM, VOSA. Defended and prosecuted in HMRC cases. Appeared for the prosecution in Health and Safety Act proceedings. Peter is a member of Chambers’ General Medical Council Team and is instructed to present at hearings that deal with all aspects of professional misconduct by doctors, including deficient professional performance. He has experience of all types of hearings including fitness to practice hearings with complex and contested expert evidence. Motoring Defence of motorists in Magistrates’ Courts and on appeal to the Crown Court and specialist advice designed to limit the effect of motoring convictions and the avoidance of disqualification.

Peter Schofield

Peter Schofield specialises in criminal work and has a flourishing practice in defence work in and around Newcastle. He has been instructed to defend in a variety of heavyweight criminal cases, including robbery and serious violence. Peter has a particular interest in crime relating to children, encompassing physical violence and sexual abuse including rape. As a result, he has developed particular expertise in the cross-examination of children in these sensitive cases. Peter has also been instructed in a number of cases with particular cultural issues and where interpreters have been required.

Richard Holland

Richard Holland is an advocate who appears in cases of significant legal and factual complexity. At ease with professional and lay clients alike, he provides each case with bespoke and timely advice and attention. Richard has been a member of New Park Court Chambers since September 2015, having successfully completed his pupillage in chambers under the supervision of Nicholas De La Poer KC. Crime Richard prosecutes and defends case of the utmost seriousness and has particular experience in large scale conspiracies concerning serious violence, firearms, drugs, and human trafficking. He is used to the pressure of working in such cases and the understandably high expectations both defendants and police/prosecution teams have about the presentation of their case. Regulatory Richard takes instructions in regulatory matters, including professional discipline, regulatory compliance, inquests, health and safety and licensing. Richard prosecutes on behalf of the General Medical Council, including at Fitness to Practise Hearings before the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service. Richard’s cases with the GMC have included presenting allegations of dishonesty and lack of candour concerning the outcome of surgery, the inappropriate and dishonest prescribing to family members, financial misconduct by doctors both at work and outside of it, and poor clinical practice leading to harm to patients. His GMC practice, together with his clinical negligence work, means Richard has a significant cross-over experience in inquests where medical professionals are suggested to have had some role in a death. Richard is also familiar with the policies and procedures of the SRA and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, including having been led in 2018 in a three-week long hearing relating to alleged overcharging by a senior solicitor. Richard was extensively involved in the preparation, tactical considerations, and pleading of the client’s case, as well as the interlocutory applications that preceded the final hearing. Richard’s enjoys an esoteric regulatory advice practice. Some of the cases he has advised on have included: A local authority considering prosecution under Health and Safety legislation of a fast-food restaurant where a young employee had been scalded in the course of their duties; The manufacturer of a set of traps for pest-control whether their design complied with the Pest Control Act 1954, the Spring Traps Approval Order 2018 and local licensing requirements for any potential purchasers; A local authority about their options in a prosecution relating to the infringement by the defendants of Planning Enforcement Notices; A company regarding its regulatory responsibilities and the effect of EU Product Safety Directives when importing mobile telephones from fellow EU countries and replacing chargers so that the products could be sold on the UK market. Advising, and drafting responses for, a Turkish Gold and Jewellery supplier as to the evidence required to prove the legitimacy of 3000 gold bullion coins seized by HMRC from couriers as they left Heathrow, ultimately leading to a successful return of the gold by HMRC. Advising on appeal and drafting notice of objections for haulage companies and drivers whom the Secretary of State for the Home Office had imposed penalties contrary to section 32 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and Carriers’ Liability Regulations 2002 for clandestine entrants entering or attempting to enter the United Kingdom being discovered in the back of commercial haulage vehicles. Clinical Negligence Richard has an extensive experience of clinical negligence work. Before joining Chambers, Richard managed his own caseload at Irwin Mitchell solicitors in the clinical negligence and product liability teams, covering cases where quantum ranged from £10,000 to over £200,000. Cases involved representing Claimants in various metal-on-metal hip litigations, representing a Claimant who had received a transplant of Hepatitis E contaminated platelets, and representing a Claimant pursuing damages arising out of the failure of his defective ICD leads. Richard enjoys a business practice of clinical negligence work as Counsel, including drafting particulars of claim, schedules of loss, advising on prospects and quantum, and conducting conferences with experts.

Robert Smith KC

Robert Smith KC is primarily, a trial advocate specialising in regulatory and medico legal cases and the defence of companies and individuals under investigation by The Serious Fraud Office, regulators such as The Financial Conduct Authority and The Health and Safety Executive and by police forces. In recent years his professional work load has involved the prosecution and defence of complex and particularly serious criminal cases, with a particular emphasis on medico-legal and scientific issues, the defence and prosecution of professional defendants such as medical practitioners and health care professionals and the defence of corporate bodies, their senior managers and directors. His cases have involved and continue to involve a wide range of situations in which the criminal law has been engaged including scientific issues, aviation, industry, coal mines, railways, food and consumer safety, educational establishments, the pharmaceutical industry, newspaper publishing and medico-legal issues. He has also advised on matters involving Parliamentary Privilege and allegations of contempt of the House of Commons. He have conducted cases involving Human Rights issues in both the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. He has acted for North West Fire Control Limited in the long running Public Inquiry into the Manchester Arena Bombing. Publication of the Inquiry’s Report is expected in the latter part of 2022. Robert advised upon and conducted litigation in the field of regulatory criminal law [in particular health and safety, bribery and corruption and the prosecution and defence of corporate bodies particularly in the context of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and the Bribery Act 2010] and related litigation, including civil actions involving the police, administrative court cases, extradition issues and cases involving misfeasance in public office. Robert has a particular interest in gross negligence manslaughter, particularly in the context of medical failings and in cases involving the medical implications of non-accidental head injury in children (‘NAHI’ – formerly described as ‘shaken baby syndrome’) and have been involved in many cases, both for the prosecution and the defence, in which the ‘triad’ of signs and their interpretation has arisen. He has conducted a significant number of cases of fraud and alleged corruption, representing both individual and corporate defendants under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. Robert is familiar with the practice of the US Department of Justice and the US Securities Exchange Commission in the context of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United States Exchange Act. Robert remains committed to conducting a number of publicly funded criminal cases and consider that the criminal Bar has an obligation to do so. Most of his pro bono work has involved advising upon and reviewing complex cases which have already been decided at first instance. These have included medico-legal and regulatory issues. He has also advised and acted pro bono in a number of recent cases involving lawyers and individuals from other professions facing regulatory process or investigation at first instance. Many of the clients in such circumstances do not have the financial means to consider avenues for redress where the legal system has failed them at first instance or where a full and effective defence would be financially onerous. He is prepared to consider a limited number of cases annually in respect of this service where instructing solicitors are in a position to provide a full file for initial assessment by him as to merit. Robert has been closely involved in presenting lectures and seminars on topics of current and historical legal and academic interest. Recent work includes presentations in respect of legal professional privilege in conjunction with the University of Northumbria in relation to reform of the law, sponsored by The Modern Law Review. Material currently in preparation includes ‘The Age of Advocacy’, a study of the Advocates of the nineteenth century and their leading cases.

Ryan Donoghue

Ryan Donoghue is an experienced court and tribunal advocate with a personable nature that enables him to easily engage with clients and ensure the most effective presentation of every case. Ryan currently has a mixed practice in crime, regulatory crime and professional discipline and has quickly adapted his skills gained at the criminal Bar, where he is a member of the CPS Advocates Panel, and applied these to secure admission to the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates and the General Medical Council’s Approved Counsel Panel. Ryan has built on this success and is increasingly instructed in high-profile regulatory and professional discipline proceedings, both acting alone and also as a led junior. Crime Ryan regularly appears for both prosecution and defence in proceedings in the Crown Court. Ryan has experience of acting in cases involving allegations of serious assault, sexual offences, drug supply, robbery, burglary, public disorder, perverting the course of justice and child neglect. Ryan also has experience in dealing with cases involving allegations of fraud and money laundering, and has a particular interest in confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act, following his previous employment in the financial sector. Ryan has also advised and represented several clients in appeals against sentence, made to the Court of Appeal, including a complex case involving the effect of a modern slavery referral upon the credit awarded to a defendant for a guilty plea. Ryan also maintains a smaller practice in the Magistrates’ Court, which primarily involves defending professional clients charged with a range of motoring offences, where he has significant experience in making submissions of exceptional hardship. Ryan also has experience in the Youth Court and has dealt with cases involving allegations of rape and other sexual offences, robbery, possession with intent to supply class A drugs and causing grievous bodily harm. Regulatory Ryan is regularly instructed to prosecute cases on behalf of the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the independent regulator of health and social care in England and Wales. Ryan also has significant experience in advising on cases at the pre-charge stage, including in relation to complex matters of causation and expert evidence. Ryan also has experience in prosecuting offences on behalf of the Health and Safety executive and other regulatory agencies, including for offences involving the causation of serious injuries. Ryan is a member of the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates, currently at Level C, qualifying him to prosecute cases on behalf of various public regulators. Ryan is also frequently instructed to represent the Care Quality Commission in First Tier Tribunal proceedings brought by or against the providers and managers of care and nursing homes, relating to restrictions placed upon their registration. Professional Discipline and Sport Ryan has a rapidly developing professional discipline practice and has been instructed in a broad range of cases before various professional regulators. Ryan is a member of the General Medical Council’s Approved Counsel Panel, enabling him to represent the GMC in Fitness to Practise proceedings in the Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Ryan is regularly instructed to act in proceedings involving allegations of criminal conviction, misconduct (including clinical misconduct and dishonesty) and adverse health. Ryan also has experience in representing police officers facing misconduct proceedings, including cases involving allegations of sub-standard investigation and improper recording practices, and has represented Social Work England on multiple occasions in misconduct proceedings brought against social workers. Ryan is also increasingly instructed to represent professional, semi-professional and amateur sportspersons facing misconduct and similar proceedings before their sport’s regulatory body. Ryan has appeared before the National Safeguarding Panel and the Rugby Football League’s Operational Rules Tribunal.

Sally Terris

Sally Terris’s main area of practice is family law. She is known for her straightforward approach even in the most complex of cases. A fearless cross examiner, and a strong all-rounder recommended for her expertise in complex financial remedy cases, children act cases, trusts of land and inheritance act matters. Sally is fine example of an advocate who masters the most complex of facts and gives clear realistic advice to clients. Family Main areas of practice: Trusts Inheritance Act Financial Orders on Divorce, including ‘third party’ interests Children: Abduction, Adoption, Private law, Public law Cohabitation Domestic Violence Foreign Marriages & Divorces Landlord & Tenant Sally practices in trusts and Inheritance Act cases, family (money and children), and in landlord and tenant. Understandably, she is much in demand for private clients, local authorities and public bodies including police and regulatory work; she also continues to act for meritorious publicly-funded parties, parents, children’s guardians and the Official Solicitor. She has a wealth of successful experience of acting for grandparents and other extended family members in care and private law Children Act cases. Sally is a fine example of an advocate who masters the most complex of facts and evidence and always aims to explain them in easily understandable terms to her various lay clients. She is recommended as a ‘fighter’ in the UK Legal 500, where she has been listed for the past decade. She also prides herself on giving clear, realistic and reliable advice on terms of settlement. Recent successes include: acting for a third party beneficiary in a complex divorce and trusts case where Sally’s pleadings and case summary brought about a concluded settlement in her elderly lay client’s favour, and the collapse of the divorce case at an early stage; representing the third party beneficiaries in a trusts and farms divorce case; fully representing a high-flying legal professional (and financial remedy judge) in a middle money divorce case with allegations of gross misconduct; successfully representing the wife of a divorce lawyer in a middle money case; representing the beneficiary of a trust fund in a complex High Court contact and residence dispute; representing numerous lay clients under disabilities pursuant to the involvement of the Official Solicitor and/or the Court of Protection; representing grandparents in a long-running, complex care case where (despite the recommendations of the Children’s Guardian) the children concerned were placed with Sally’s lay clients on a special guardianship order; arguing for the rare discharge of a parental responsibility order, together with a highly unusual four-year Section 91(14) prohibition; gaining permission to appeal in a public law case on behalf of a parent on the gravest imaginable facts; giving a very carefully considered paper advice in a middle money divorce which enabled an elderly, frail lay client to make the right decision for her on full information. Sally is instructed in a wide range of family trusts cases, including TOLATA, and ancillary relief matters. She is also very regularly briefed in Children Act cases. Many of Sally’s cases, both property and children, have a cultural or international element; and she is frequently asked for advice and representation in cases of third party interests, multiple properties and family businesses, farms and pensions. Sally has acted in a number of high profile cases, in the High Court and Court of Appeal, where she is known for her courage, tenacity, plain speaking and realism. Sally has acted in a large number of care cases involving baby-shaking, fictitious and/or induced illness, personality disorders, complex and/or conflicting expert evidence and sexual abuse. She has extensive experience of difficult contact and residence applications including those involving a Rule 16 Children’s Guardian, and care cases involving complex medical issues. Public law work includes assessments, attachment disorders, baby shaking, conflicting expert evidence, complex radiological and/or neurological evidence, depression, domestic violence, fictitious and/or induced illness, learning disabled parents, ‘perpetrator’ cases, personality disorders and sexual abuse. Extensive experience of difficult contact and residence disputes, including the appointment of a Children’s Guardian under Rule 16 and findings of fact in cases of alleged domestic violence.

Sharon Beattie KC

Sharon Beattie KC acts in complex cases involving scientific, pathological and medical evidence. As well as cases of Homicide (both Prosecuting and Defending), Sexual Trafficking/Exploitation, Sharon has continued to act in professional disciplinary cases, which have included matters as diverse as an 8 month case involving complex oncology evidence. Sharon has also dealt with cases involving jurisdictional issues as between the USA and the status of USA criminal convictions and “equivalence” in the UK, as well as the status/relevance of “acquittals” in the criminal jurisdiction in regulatory proceedings. Sharon is consistently rated as a leading individual by Chambers Directory. Crime Sharon is also instructed in cases involving serious crime. Sharon is regularly instructed to prosecute offences of homicide and has a particular interest in cases involving medical and scientific evidence dealing with causation, paediatric pathology and deaths during surgery. Sharon is often first choice in sensitive and high profile sexual cases. Since being initially instructed in the high profile prosecutions of two consultant psychiatrists, Dr Kerr [(2006)2 Cr App R 31] and Dr Haslam, which resulted in a public enquiry and influenced the drafting of professional guidelines regarding the use of chaperones, she has developed and maintained a high quality practice which focusses upon serious, challenging and sensitive issues. She has prosecuted medical professionals for serious sexual misconduct both in the regulatory sphere and in the criminal jurisdiction. Additionally her interest in clinical issues has led her to being asked to advise both in the regulatory and criminal jurisdiction upon issues as diverse as improper prescribing practices to detainees in police stations, spinal surgery, “hymen reconstruction”, eye surgery, consent in surgical procedures, and oncology. Sharon’s range of experience in the regulatory area and criminal area have led to her being instructed in serious cases in both jurisdictions. Her interest and practice in medical regulation and practice means she is well placed to get to grips with difficult concepts in relation to pathological and clinical issues. Her longstanding experience of sexual cases has led to her being instructed in high profile criminal cases such as R v Ormond, the trial of a Newcastle football coach who was convicted of historic sexual assaults upon a large number of young players, as well as being instructed in a multi handed grooming case. Additionally Sharon undertook the defence of a former professional client upon serious sexual allegations, the Judge acceeded to a submission of no case at the close of the Prosecution case. Presently involved in a case involving complex oncology issues and end of life care. R v C - Murder of infant – complex paediatric pathology. R v I, W, M & L - Led by R Smith KC. Prosecution of Four defendants charged with Murder/Causing the death of a vulnerable adult. Issues re interpretation of relevant statutory provision. Appeared in Court of Appeal in relation to L’s appeal against conviction (appeal dismissed). R v K & C - Led by R Smith KC. Prosecution of two defendants charged with Murder/Causing allowing the death of a child. Complex paediatric evidence. Regulatory Sharon specialises in Medical Disciplinary / Regulatory Work and Serious Crime. Sharon is regularly instructed to present the most complex cases before the General Medical Council and in the criminal jurisdiction. She therefore has vast experience in cross-examination of the most difficult witnesses including professionals, experts and also including extremely vulnerable witnesses. Her meticulous preparation, attention to detail and skilful advocacy lends her to being instructed in the most serious of cases. RE Dr C. Sexual allegations against a consultant – issue as to abuse of process and degree of prejudice required. Submissions upheld on Appeal. Re Dr X. Conduct re misappropriation of prescription of opioids and drugs of abuse. Substantial case involving a multiplicity of issues. Advisory Work Regularly asked to consider pre charge issues in criminal jurisdiction in particular those relating to medico legal issues. Undertakes advisory work as to appropriateness of regulatory proceedings following acquittals in the criminal courts, as well as advising as to evidence on complex cases. Appellate Work Had been regularly instructed in Appellate work in the Administrative Court in regulatory matters. The work is a reflection of her career to date undertaking sensitive and high profile work on a regular basis. This work over the years has included the Prosecution of high profile professionals, which have been lined to public inquiries. Additionally has always been instructed in cases: Involving complex toxicology eg Police officer charged with Rape on female he had been asked to help; Serial Rapist buying women [who had rejected his advance] a drink as a sign of “goodwill” and then spiking it. Serial attacked of students in Student housing, case turned on limited scientific and “Bad Character”. Case stayed as Abuse of Process re Suggestible Defendant [Article featured in Archbold]. Acted for vulnerable Defendant in historic case, Defendant, formerly an engineer, as result of illness had no short term memory but good long term memory. Evidence before the jury as to the limitations of his memory. Defendant acquitted. Additionally she has been instructed in many serious cases involving different issues [at Grade 4] such as Robbery with facial mapping. Fraud cases with jurisdictional issues.

Simon Kealey KC

Simon Kealey was appointed Queens Counsel in 2017. He is an extremely popular advocate who enjoys a busy practice concentrating solely on criminal law for both defence and prosecution. Simon has been involved in a large number of the leading cases both on the North Eastern Circuit and beyond. The principal offence groups undertaken are murder and manslaughter, serious fraud, high value drug offences, people trafficking, sexual offences and driving offences resulting in fatalities. The work undertaken by Simon often includes cases of significant factual and legal complexity and involve legal teams which Simon will lead. In addition to the work undertaken in the Crown Court Simon also has an impressive appeal practice and has been involved in many complex appeal court matters throughout his career. Simon will accept instructions in significant cases from legally aided clients and will cover the full spectrum of criminal offences and appeal work for private clients.

Simon Jackson KC

Simon Jackson KC is regularly instructed in serious criminal (principally homicide), regulatory (including corporate manslaughter), professional discipline (police and medical) cases and inquests (acting as ‘counsel to the inquiry’ on behalf of HM Coroner on two occasions). Crime Both as a junior and throughout his time in ‘silk’ Simon Jackson has been instructed in serious criminal cases. These are now principally homicide, fraud and regulatory cases. For example, he has specialist experience in relation to deaths involving children, and for example was recently involved in defending a woman charged with killing her infant daughter. Case involved complex issues of causation relating to multiple and complex injuries, including a skull fracture and the presence of the so called ‘triad’ of injuries, namely hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, bilateral thin film acute subdural haemorrhages and extensive multi-layered retinal haemorrhages. Case involved complex medical evidence from a large number of tertiary referral experts on both sides of the case. He has extensive experience of dealing with serious criminal cases that involve complex disclosure issues involving, ‘joint enterprise’, PII and ‘abuse of process’ arguments based on delay and alleged unfairness to defendants. As an experienced leader he has considerable experience dealing with cases involving complex medical, pathological, scientific and technical evidence. He is also familiar and comfortable with working in teams, from the early stages of a case, and providing leadership where required. Police Discipline As a Junior and in silk, Simon Jackson has regularly undertaken police disciplinary cases defending officers [across four police forces] charged with a variety of offences, including dishonesty, sexual harassment, misfeasance in a public office and ‘test purchasing’ sexual services as part of a police undercover vice operation. He has also regularly represented police officers, often custody officers [sergeants or inspectors] in connection with ‘death in custody’ Inquests. He has represented a police firearms team in West Yorkshire in relation to the death of a western ‘quick draw’ fan who confronted the police with a firearm in Huddersfield. He was also in involved in the inquest concerning Christopher Alder who died in custody in Hull and the related judicial review proceedings. Simon Jackson has experience of dealing with cases that have been the subject of complex Professional Standards and IPCC investigations. Healthcare Simon is a full member of the GMC’s Approved Panel of Counsel presenting Fitness to Practise cases involving serious misconduct, deficient professional performance allegations before Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service Tribunals Fitness to Practice Panels and Review Hearings. Dr D v General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 3379 (Admin). Case involving conduct of a UK based multi-centre industry sponsored medical research clinical trial. Dr AM v General Medical Council [2015] (Admin) Wilkie J. 19.06.2015 GMC v Dr P [2012]. Case involving the London ‘G20’ riots forensic pathologist who was struck off the Medical Register  for misconduct by a Fitness to Practise Panel arising out his conduct of the Ian Tomlinson post mortem in April 2009. Pathologist had erroneously concluded that the cause of death was ‘natural causes’, when he had in fact been assaulted by a police officer. Health & Safety The Health and Safety work has involved representing both individuals and corporate clients. Recently acted for a builder and care home proprietor in relation to a fatal fall involving a vulnerable elderly resident, whose fall arose from alleged historic structural defects in terms of the design and construction of the home’s wooden staircase, and more recent management failures of inspection re: the defects This was a local authority prosecution, and complex ‘basis of plea’ issues and sentence hearing immediately pre-commencement of the new Sentencing Guidelines. [R v DG (1.12. 2015) Crown Court at Leicester] Achieved a substantial reduction in Local Authority’s costs on summary taxation. Recently instructed for an employer where the issue was the alleged overexposure of employees to dust when working in a lime kiln, involving complicated expert evidence re WEL exposure rates and mitigating/compliance measures. R v Lion Steel Equipment Limited & Others [2012]. Simon Jackson was instructed in the trial of what was the only the third corporate manslaughter prosecution (under the 2007 Act) and allied gross negligence manslaughter prosecution, involving an industrial (roofing) accident. Inquests Specialises in cases involving deaths in custody, in hospitals and outdoor (adventure) activities where issues of gross negligence, neglect and ‘Article 2’ breaches may arise. Recently instructed in relation Inquests concerning a death of child on an overseas school trip. Acted as a Legal Assessor on behalf of one of HM Coroner in connection with an Article 2 compliant alleged negligent medical treatment Inquest and on behalf of another HM Coroner as ‘Counsel to the Inquest’ in an Article 2 compliant ‘Death in Custody’ Inquest. Acted for Local Authority where teenager in care committed suicide, and separately for the Family when a patient receiving ‘community based’ psychiatric support committed suicide, as a consequence of alleged ‘neglect of care’.

Stephen Uttley

Stephen Uttley defends exclusively in serious crime. He will fight unfalteringly on behalf of his clients and has an exhaustive list of cases of importance. In regulatory matters, he often deals with a wide range of complicated HSE cases including fatal accidents. Stephen also appears in the Court of Appeal in relation to potentially unsafe convictions and excessive sentences. Crime R v Q [2024] - Q was charged with three serious offences arising out of an incident where whilst driving a car in the Halifax area he mounted a pavement and drove directly at a group of boys causing serious injuries to them. After a medical assessment had taken place he pleaded guilty to all matters and the Court made an order under Section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 together with a Restriction Order under Section 41 of the same Act. R v M (2024) - M was charged with offences arising out of an incident where he was said to have been the aggressor carrying a knife which resulted in him being attacked by others and receiving life threatening injuries. Another person was also murdered during the incident. The Defence were able to establish the unreliability of the evidence against him including DNA evidence which the Prosecution ultimately accepted, and a not guilty verdict was directed by the Court. Two others were convicted of murder arising out of the incident. R v T (2023) - T was charged with an offence of Armed Robbery involving two others. The Prosecution relied upon DNA evidence on a weapon used in the offence which was recovered at the scene and the purported identification of T by the Complainant. During a five-day retrial the Defence were able to undermine the credibility of the Prosecution’s identification evidence and establish that the DNA was not compelling when considering all the evidence in the case. T was acquitted under two hours by the Jury. Regulatory R v Edwin Hodge (2009) - Insolvency case in relation to non-disclosure of assets in UK and abroad. Convicted. R v Kerry Harrison (2009) - Insolvency case and non-disclosure of assets. Convicted. R v Bakish Alla Khan & Others [2008] EWCA Crim 531 - [Prosecution of Michael Arshad Khan on behalf of BERR]. Leading case on persons who can sit on a jury. Case before The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. Applications rejected by the Court in applying the principles as laid down in the House of Lords in Abdroikof. Court ruled that conviction was safe and ruled against the Appellants Grounds of Appeal. Health & Safety R v The Mission to Seafarers (2024) - The Prosecution was as a result of an investigation by Stockton‑on‑Tees Borough Council in relation to a fatality that occurred at The Seafarers’ Centre, Seal Sands Road, Stockton on Tees TS2 1UA where the deceased fell from height whilst attempting to replace a loft ladder. The Mission to Seafarers, who are one of the largest maritime charities in the world, faced one offence contrary to Section 3(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 Safety at Work etc Act 1974 in that they failed to ensure, so far as was reasonably practicable, the health, safety, and welfare at work of all their non- employees including the deceased. Mr Uttley advised on the case from the outset. The Mission to Seafarers pleaded guilty to the offence and were dealt with at Teesside Crown Court. R v Britcon (2021) - The Prosecution was for one offence contrary to Section 3(1) of the HSW Act 1974. Mr Uttley advised the HSE from the outset of the Prosecution. The case related to their failure to ensure, so far as was reasonably practicable, the safety and welfare at work of all their non- employees including the complainant in the case who was struck by a seven meter sheet pile weighing approximately 190 Kg whilst cleaning sheet piles as they were removed from a surge pit by a Doosan excavator causing serious injuries to the complainant. Britcon were fined £570K. R v G (2019) - G was successfully prosecuted for an offence contrary to Section 2 of the HSWA. G had been the sole Director of a company which had been subsequently dissolved after the incident but before the Prosecution commenced. The Prosecution was brought against G when applying Sections 2 and 37 of the HSWA. The case involved a worker using a lorry loader crane to deliver soil, but when he brought the crane down his left arm was impaled on a spike protruding from the control system. The impact resulted in leaving him with life-changing injuries. The HSE investigation found that the safety system had been disabled and part of the safety guard around the controls had been cut off, leaving an exposed spike which impaled the man’s arm.

Stuart Graham

Stuart Graham has extensive experience in complex cases of drug conspiracies, complex frauds, violent disorders and firearms. Stuart Graham has throughout his career solely specialised in crime. He has over 20 years experience in the Crown Court defending criminal cases at the very highest level. In the last year Stuart has defended in cases of murder, international people trafficking, serious assaults, armed robberies and aggravated burglaries. With regard to recent legislation, Stuart has been involved in defending modern slavery offences and some of the first coercive and controlling behaviour prosecutions. In addition, Stuart has lengthy experience in fraud, ‘cash for crash’ cases and complex drug and theft conspiracies. The use of time line, cell site and forensic analysis that is integral to such cases, is something Stuart is very proficient with. Stuart is regularly instructed in cases of violent disorder, firearms offences, arson with intent to endanger life, and blackmail. Coming initially from a technical career in aviation, Stuart particularly relishes intricate cases involving accident reconstruction, expert evidence in complex road traffic accidents, and Health and Safety prosecutions. Crime 2019 R v I - Conveying Articles into Prison - Involved in one of the specialist prison prosecution teams’ cases involving attempting to move weapons, phones and drugs intro local prisons. 2018 R v T - Murder - Defending client in high profile murder case which had become one of the North East of England’s largest manhunts with the case going unsolved for nearly two decades. 2018 Operation Bowler - People Smuggling and Slavery - Secured acquittal on the main ‘People Trafficking’ charge for client after a 14 week trial. Aviation Law Stuart Graham is a somewhat unique specialist in Aviation Law. He has undertaken cases on behalf of pilots and aircrew accused of breaches of the Air Navigation Order. Stuart has the distinct and unique advantage in this field of having worked as a pilot for over 25 years in the aviation industry. Stuart commenced flying in 1985, first obtaining a basic licence and subsequent instrument and instructor qualifications, leading to becoming a Senior Flight Instructor with associated Commercial Pilot’s Licence. Whilst mainly defending pilots and other aviation personnel, Stuart has also prosecuted on behalf of the Civil Aviation Authority in highly technical cases such as breaches of landing minima. Stuart has the rare combination of over 25 years in professional flying coupled with his vast Court experience as a Barrister. This unique dual experience enables clients access to a barrister who can genuinely relate to the technicalities of flying from the real experience gained in over thousands of hours of professional flying time and in addition have the Court experience to utilise that knowledge. Stuart was recently specifically chosen to represent a commercial pilot and aircraft captain prosecuted in a high profile case. This trial involved the detailed cross examination of professional witnesses such as air traffic controllers. The case also involved technical areas of meteorology and aviation law and evidence interpretation through the use of Court visual aids. The trial concluded in an acquittal for the accused whose professional livelihood and career was in jeopardy. If you have an aviation related matter, then you could not find elsewhere a more appropriately qualified lawyer to be engaged with your case.

Susannah Proctor

Susannah Proctor is an outstanding and passionate advocate; she is regularly instructed in a range of serious and complex cases including sexual offending, serious violence, organised crime and firearms. Susannah regularly deals with defendants with fitness-to-plead issues and other mental health disorders. She balances empathy with a tenacious and relentless pursuit of justice. Susannah has been led by distinguished silks in murder cases for both the prosecution and defence. Crime R v W, Bradford Crown Court 2022 (Murder). Led by Alistair McDonald KC prosecuting a defendant for murder involving knife crime and perverting the course of justice. Instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service R v M Newcastle Crown Court 2022 (Sexual Offences). Serious offences of rape and other violence sexual offending against multiple woman with whom the defendant weas at the time in relationships with, offences included allegations of controlling and coercive behaviour. Instructed by Westgarths Solicitors, Newcastle R v A 2022 Newcastle Crown Court (Sexual Offences). Defendant on a deprivation or liberty order, alleged to have carried out a rape on a stranger, issues of fitness to stand trial. Family Susannah deals with a range of family matters including injunctions under the Family Law Act 1996, care proceedings, private and public law proceedings under the Children Act 1989 representing both local authority and parents, including cases involving serious violent and sexual offences including rape and Forced Marriage Protection Orders. Susannah has dealt with finding of fact cases including cross examination of serious violence and sexual offences with extensive experience relating to special measures and other technology to support parties and witnesses.

Thomas Moran

From 1997-2018, Thomas practised in Criminal Law, prosecuting and defending the full range of criminal work including serious sexual offences, homicide and terrorist offences. Since 2018, Thomas practises exclusively in professional disciplinary work. This includes numerous GMC fitness to practise hearings involving issues including sexual misconduct, dishonesty, clinical negligence and the commission of criminal offences. This practice in professional discipline is combined with a number of fee-paid judicial roles, ie: Recorder (Crime and Family) Deputy District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Mental Health Tribunal Judge (Restricted Patients’ Panel) Immigration and Asylum Judge

Tom Storey KC

Tom Storey KC is regularly recommended as a leading individual for criminal law in legal directories. He both prosecutes and defends, and is regularly instructed in cases involving homicide, terrorism, fraud and serious organised crime, including cases arising from the NCA investigation into the use of encrypted Encrochat mobile phones (Operation Venetic); he also has much experience of cases involving allegations of historic sexual abuse, and has been instructed in cases involving issues relating to national security. Tom also has considerable experience of Appeal Court advocacy. Homicide & Serious Violence Latoszewski & Kalinowska (Leeds Crown Court). High-publicity murder of 15-year-old boy by his mother and her partner, who together repeatedly beat the child causing multiple internal injuries which ultimately led to massive infection and his death. Much of the violence was captured on CCTV cameras installed within the family home. Mohammed Shabaz (Sheffield Crown Court). Attempted murder of man who had previously been acquitted of the murder of defendant’s cousin (targeted revenge attack). Defendant travelled from Oldham to Sheffield to lie in wait for victim; stabbed repeatedly in attack Defendant then attempted to set fire to the vehicle he had travelled in. TM & RC (Leeds Crown Court). Causing or allowing a child to suffer serious physical harm. Two-month-old infant son of the defendants found to have 13 separate fractures to his body, caused over period of time. Extensive expert medical evidence. Terrorism DL (Leeds Crown Court). Possessing & collecting documents likely to have been of use to a terrorist. Defendant in possession of multiple copies of The Anarchist’s Cookbook and a prohibited weapon. Much digital and other evidence of extreme rightwing ideology. Defendant had previously been referred to Prevent programme. Serious Organised Crime Miah & others (Bradford Crown Court). Four defendants charged with offences relating to the receipt in West Yorkshire of 15kg of import-strength cocaine which had been collected from London, and associated possession of a prohibited firearm and ammunition. Operation Callaway (Preston Crown Court). Manchester-based gang of Albanian nationals had set up cannabis “farms” in houses in Burnley. When one such property was attacked by Burnley-based gang, those in Manchester travelled up to defend their investment. Serious disorder in residential streets, involving two men being shot, one struck with a machete and multiple vehicles damaged; one vehicle abandoned and subsequently set on fire. Khalid (Sheffield Crown Court). Defendant charged with conspiracies to supply controlled drugs and to sell prohibited firearms, and possession of prohibited firearms and ammunition. Evidence of conspiracies derived entirely from content of Encrochat mobile phone messages between “handle” attributed to defendant and others involved in the wholesale drugs trade. Serious Sexual Offences John Hewitt (Hull Crown Court). Multiple allegations of non-recent (1970s and 1980s) sexual abuse of young girls by former houseparent at children’s home in East Yorkshire. Three separate complainants, with limited knowledge of each other. Defendant kept one of them hidden at his flat for several months, where he repeatedly abused her, when she was subject of a missing person enquiry by Humberside Police. Unsuccessful attempt by Defendant – now acting in person – to appeal his conviction and sentence. Paul Lamb (Hull Crown Court). Multiple allegations of non-recent (1970s and 1980s) sexual abuse of multiple young girls at children’s homes in both London and East Yorkshire, where defendant’s wife and he had worked. A total of eight complainants gave evidence of abuse by Defendant; one of them the Defendant had continued to have a sexual relationship with once she was an adult. Peter Turner (Gregory Carroll) (York Crown Court). Non-recent (1980s) sexual abuse of former pupils at Ampleforth College public school by former monk and teacher at school; offences also committed upon altar boys in parish in Cumbria to which defendant had been sent by the school when abuse first complained of. He had previously been prosecuted for abuse on other former pupils in 2005; consideration of autrefois convict doctrine in relation to the way this case was presented. Driving-related Fatalities & Serious Injury Coyles (Leeds Crown Court). Causing death of two people by dangerous driving and causing serious injury by dangerous driving to two more. Serious collision in which defendant driving at excessive speed on road leading out of village into open countryside, lost control and caused head-on collision with taxi, killing two passengers in taxi and causing life-changing injuries to his own passenger and taxi driver. AJ (York Crown Court). Allegation of causing death by dangerous driving, in which defendant was “towing” deceased’s motorcycle; manoeuvre involved deceased holding onto rear grab bar on defendant’s motorcycle with one hand, steering his own motorcycle with the other; deceased lost control, and fell to the road, suffering fatal head injuries. AB-C (Leeds Crown Court). Allegation of causing death by careless driving. Defendant driving her vehicle out of space in supermarket car park, said to have collided with elderly man crossing the lane to her right; he fell to ground, suffering internal head injuries from which he later died. Issues relating to causation, given pre-existing medical condition and fall earlier that day at home. Fraud & Financial Crime Mujikwa & others (Leeds Crown Court). Seven defendants charged with offences relating to large-scale intercept fraud and associated money-laundering offences. Email communications of various international businesses (including the BBC) were intercepted, resulting in millions of pounds being paid into and then laundered through accounts which had been set up for the purpose, some in fabricated names and others having been acquired from co-accused. Tuner & others (Sheffield Crown Court). Offence of fraud committed by carer upon vulnerable supported residents of care home in Sheffield; over £900,000 obtained and then laundered through accounts held in names of defendant’s brothers. Protracted confiscation proceedings followed conviction. Blamire & another (Leeds Crown Court). Conspiracy to commit fraud by abuse of position, relating to operation of procurement process conducted by West Yorkshire Police for vehicle-recovery contracts. Subsequent confiscation proceedings involved issues relating to corporate vs personal involvement.

Valerie Sterling

Valerie Sterling is Head of the Family Team and has a strong reputation for representing her clients with skill, determination, and sensitivity. Valerie is a qualified legal representative for the purpose of conducting cross examination on behalf of prohibited parties in family proceedings – see sections 65 and 66 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. She attends specialised domestic abuse training for Family Lawyers. Valerie has participated in a meeting convened by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Get Refusal and religious divorce – an area of particular interest. Valerie is a member of Resolution and is on the local Resolution committee, as well as being on the local committee of the Family Law Bar Association. Matrimonial Finance Valerie represents clients from diverse backgrounds in medium to high net worth cases. She has broad experience of business, property and pensions, profit and loss accounts, third party interests, appeals and making successful applications for costs. Valerie takes care in thorough and insightful preparation of complex material. In particular, she has wide experience of representing professional parties including consultant physicians and surgeons, as well as members of the teaching and accountancy professions and members of the Armed Forces. Care Proceedings Valerie represents local authorities, guardians and parents in the most complex of care proceedings. Having worked for 16 years for Leeds City Council, she had acquired a profound understanding of public law work and attended many case conferences and adoption panels as a legal advisor. She has an excellent understanding of medical evidence and how to prepare effective cross-examination of expert witnesses. For example, Valerie has represented parents alleged to have sexually abused their own children and where their children are expressing extreme sexualised behaviours. Valerie handles with appropriate sensitivity cases involving personality and mental heath issues. Children Act & Private Law Valerie has a broad experience of private law Children Act proceedings involving residence, contact, Prohibited Steps Orders, Specific Issue Orders, applications to relocate both internally and internationally and Article 15 Brussels ii. She able to represent her client’s case in a persuasive manner and achieve the optimum outcome. She has particular experience in the most complex cases involving a Rule 16.4 appointment of a Children’s Guardian or NYAS worker. Child Abduction & International Relocation Valerie is currently in demand to deal with cases of child abduction and international relocation. These often involve a parent taking a child abroad without the agreement of the other parent. Valerie is skilled in acting rapidly to get a child back – or to defend a parent raising the answers of acquiescence or grave risk or intolerable circumstances should the parent and child return.

Vincent Ward

Vincent Ward has a well-established criminal practice. He accepts instructions in all types of cases, including complex cases and those of the utmost seriousness. He is on the approved list of advocates authorised to prosecute rape and serious sexual offences. He also appears regularly in the Mental Health Review Tribunal. Previously he worked in the music industry where he developed organisational and interpersonal skills to an extremely high level. He is known for his straightforward approach and for getting to the heart of a case quickly. Vincent is qualified to offer legal advice and representation directly to the public through the public access scheme and is using this opportunity to develop his civil practice. Having lectured in law at Northumbria University between 1998 and 2005 he maintains close links with the university, maintains a keen interest in education and training, is a qualified advocacy trainer and has recently completed a 3 year appointment as an external examiner for the BPTC (the professional course for training barristers). Vincent was called to the bar in 1998 and has a Masters degree in mental health law. Crime Vincent has a burgeoning practise in both prosecution and defence work. He has prosecuted cases of serious violence and homicide. He is authorised to prosecute cases of rape and serious sexual offences. He has defended in cases involving homicide, serious fraud, large scale drug supply, large scale commercial burglary and serious sexual assaults (including rape). He has become recognised for his use of information technology in case preparation and can confidently manage cases involving very high volumes of material. He maintains an interest in education. R v Jaspreet Oberoi, Ricky Collins and others. Operation Ultimatum. Conspiracy to Steal. Sheffield Crown Court. H. H. Judge Reeds K.C. Led by Matthew Donkin. Instructed by the Serious Economic Organised Crime and International Directorate, CPS. The prosecution of twenty defendants who were conspiring to steal rail in substantial quantities from locations all around the country. The principal organisers were a scrap metal dealer based at Kiveton Park, a former railway worker and a manager at Network Rail and those in lesser roles including a number of defendants who worked on the railway or were involved in the stealing. Some 3000 tonnes of rail were stolen and shipped abroad at a loss to Network Rail of over £1 million and generating substantial quantities of cash for the conspirators. Due to the size of the case, the prosecution of the defendants needed three separate trials to be conducted over a period of 20 months. A vast volume of documentary and other evidence was obtained by British Transport Police officers and needed to be distilled down into manageable form for each jury, without contaminating one trial with evidence of a separate conspiracy. Cell-site evidence and telephone data was of such a volume that over one hundred separate Sequence of Events charts were prepared by an analyst to cover the 125 separate individual thefts that took place. Fourteen defendants were convicted. R v Ashraf - Defence- A conspiracy to commit arson in which Vincent defended. The case involved complex psychiatric and other medical evidence. R v Greaves (2018) - Defence This was a case involving the most serious sexual allegations by multiple complainants resulting in mixed verdicts. Although the defendant was acquitted of rape and other serious sexual offences those offences he was convicted of attracted a life sentence. The disclosure issues in the case were identified by the judge as of special interest to the national disclosure review announced by CPS in Jan 2018. The case also involved arguments over the service of telephone evidence. Vincent’s arguments were successful in both cases. Following those arguments (which took up the first week of the trial) the case involved cross examination on a large number of text and social media messages. This required lengthy detailed forensic work and demonstrates Vincent’s commitment to thorough preparation. Inquests Vincent is experienced in Inquest work. He has recently been instructed in the following cases: Represented the interests of an elderly car driver who had pulled out onto a road causing a collision in which the teenage driver of an oncoming car and her 8 year old brother died. There were parallel criminal proceedings. Represented the interests of a lorry driver involved in a head on crash with a car in which the car driver died. Represented the interest of a car driver who had run down an killed an elderly pedestrian. Public Access Vincent continues to develop his experience in landlord and tenant work (both commercial and residential) and is rapidly growing his practice in assisting small businesses in particular. Re: A - A case in which Vincent represented the claimant in a claim for specific performance of a contract to buy/sell real property. Viewpoint - Vincent advises this client (a commercial landlord with properties in Berwick) on a regular basis. He has drafted particulars of claim in a successful lease dispute and advised generally on landlord and tenant obligations over the last 7 years. PCC Systems - Vincent drafted bespoke terms and conditions for this SME Information Technology company (2016)

Legal 500

Our Team

FAQs

Marketing Resources

Newsletters

Contact us