Lee & Ko

On July 25, 2024, the Ministry of Economy and Finance released the 2024 proposed tax law amendment proposals (“Proposals”).

Attorney-client privilege has once again become a controversial topic in Korean legal practice as there have been reports that in recent criminal investigations,

On June 10, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) released the “Guidelines on Determining NFTs’ Status as Virtual Assets” (Guidelines).

In connection with the recently amended Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (“MRFTA”), which amendments will take effect from August 7, 2024 (the “Amended MRFTA”),

Following the Financial Services Commission (FSC)’s announcement of the “Measures to Overhaul Regulations to Permit Issuance and Circulation of Security Tokens” in February 2023,

Lee & Ko has been selected as one of the “2024 Asia Top 15 ESG Law Firms" by Asian Legal Business for the second consecutive year.

Lee & Ko has been named to this year’s IAM Patent 1000 in Patent Litigation, receiving the highest band ranking of Gold for the 10th consecutive year and “Highly Recommended” in Patent Transactions again for the third year running.

Lee & Ko attorney Vera Eun Woo Lee in the Intellectual Property Group was chosen as a ‘Top 250 women in IP’ for two consecutive years.

Lee & Ko achieved awards in four categories by ‘Benchmark Asia-Pacific Awards 2024’.

Lee & Ko attorney Keum Nang Park was selected as 2024 ‘Top 100 Women in Litigation’ for the Asia-Pacific region as published by Benchmark Litigation.

Sung Hui Yoon, an attorney of Lee & Ko, was selected as ‘Top 40 Under 40 2024’ for the Asia-Pacific region as published by Benchmark Litigation.

Lee & Ko was selected as Tier 1 law firm in Korea for the every 10 categories by ‘Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2024’ for two successive years. All categories are listed below. Firm Rankings Commercial and Transactions Competition/Antitrust Construction Insolvency Intellectual Property International Arbitration Labor and Employment Product Liability and Recall Tax White Collar Crime Also, 58 attorneys were chosen as ‘Litigation Star’ and ‘Future Star’. As Lee & Ko attorneys were selected more than any other domestic law firms, they were recognized for their achievements in their respective fields.  Ranked Lawyer * Litigation Star Competition/antitrust: Jangwoo Park, Jeong-Ho Sun, Pyoung Keun Song, Mi Ji Lee, Hwan Jeong Commercial and transactions: Won Seok Ko, Jae Heon Park, Dajoo Jung, Jin Soo Han Construction: Myung Jong Kim, Seon Tae Kim, Chanik Jang Intellectual Property: Un Ho Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Julie Shin, Choong Jin Oh, Keum Nang Park, Hayoun Chun International arbitration: Robert Wachter, Sunyoung Kim, Sean (Sungwoo) Lim, Sang Hoon Han Insolvency: Wan Shik Lee, Jung Hyun Lee, Jiwoong Lim Labor and employment: Hyunseok Song, Sang Hoon Lee, Chang Soo Jin Product liability and recall: Bomsok Ko, Dajoo Jung Tax: Jay Shim, Sung Hwan Kim, Ok Hyun Ma, Byeong Jun Son, Kyung Tae Kim White collar crime: Yong Seok Park, Jae Deog Bae, Jin So, Tae Yop Lee, Young Sub Jang  Future Star Competition/antitrust: Ji Hoon Kim, Byong Ki Chung Construction: Janghee Yoon, Joo Hye Hong Intellectual Property: Hyeon Gil Ryoo International arbitration: Saemee Kim Insolvency: Kyu Hyung Jang Labor and employment: William Kim Product liability and recall: Yangsuk Han Tax: Soo Hyuk Yim Future Star(Practice Not Stated): Se young Kang, Jaewoo Kwak, Ki Jung Sung, Soo Yeon Oh, Jung Ho Ryu, Kyeong-Seop Yoon, Grace Yoon, Kiri Yi, Gang Cheol Chu Benchmark Litigation is a world-renowned publication which highlights the fields of dispute resolution and litigation and publishes rankings based on in-depth analysis of submissions by law firm and interviews with lawyers, clients, and litigation experts every year.  

We are pleased to inform you of a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Korea which has significant implications for e-commerce platform operators within the country.

The draft presidential decree regulations (Regulation(s)), released on January 23, 2024 following 2023 Tax Law Amendment announced, has been revised, finalized and published by the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) on February 29, 2024.

Lee & Ko has been selected as the winner of the Specialist award – Pro Bono at the 2024 IFLR Asia Pacific Awards.

Lee & Ko attorneys Tong Keun Seol and Jin Young Jung won the “ESG Lawyer of the Year” and “Transport Lawyer of the Year” respectively at the awards ceremony of The Asia Legal Awards 2024.

The Korea Fair Trade Commission’s (KFTC) proposed amendment to the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act (Subcontracting Act) was approved by the National Assembly during its plenary session on February 1, 2024 and will take effect on August 28, 2024.

Lee & Ko was selected as the only “Law Firm of the Year” in Korea at the Korea Law Awards 2023 hosted by the Asia Business Law Journal (ABLJ).

Lee & Ko has been recognized once again for its exceptional capabilities in legal service in 2024 by Chambers Global.

Lee & Ko was selected as Tier 1 law firm in Korea across 15 fields according to ‘The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2024’.

Lee & Ko lawyers Sanggon Kim, Ho Joon Moon, Sung Min Kim, Jaewoo Kwak have been selected as ‘Korea Super 30 Lawyers 2023’ presented by ALB(Asian Legal Business) Magazine.

In the '2023 Korea’s Top 100 Lawyers' researched by Asia Business Law Journal, 23 lawyers from Lee & Ko have been selected, marking the largest number among domestic law firms.

Lee & Ko was ranked Band 1 by 'Chambers Asia-Pacific Guide 2024’ in 13 practice areas. For the individual rankings, 65 attorneys were recognized as ‘Leading Individuals’ throughout all practice areas.

Lee & Ko was ranked Band 1 in the Legal sector of the Chambers FinTech Guide 2024.

Lee & Ko has achieved significant recognition at “Asialaw Awards 2023,” receiving honors in a total of six categories, including “Asia Firm of the Year” and “South Korea Firm of the Year”.

Mr. Steve Minhoo Kim, a senior foreign attorney (admitted to the District of Columbia) at Lee & Ko, has been honored with the ‘Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year’ at the ITR APAC Tax Awards 2023, standing out as the sole recipient in this individual category among the members of Korean law firms. 

Ji Hyeong Park, an attorney at Lee & Ko Attorney was selected as ‘2023 Asia Top 15 Female Lawyer’ by Asian Legal Business (ALB) Magazine. Since joining Lee & Ko in 2012, Ji Hyeong Park has been a partner in the General Corporate Practice Group at Lee & Ko. Her practice has focused on the areas of mergers & acquisitions, corporate governance and hostile takeover & defense. ALB Magazine is a legal magazine in the Asia-Pacific region published by Thomson Reuters, a prestigious legal business media. In this August issue, ALB Magazine has recognized top 15 female lawyers who have displayed outstanding achievements throughout their careers from 11 different Asian countries, including India, Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea and Japan.

Ji Hyeong Park, an attorney at Lee & Ko Attorney was selected as ‘2023 Asia Top 15 Female Lawyer’ by Asian Legal Business (ALB) Magazine. 

Lee & Ko received the highest level of recognition as the best law firm in the area of trademark, patent and copyright in the 2023 IP Stars Law Firm Ranking announced by Managing IP.

Lee & Ko has been selected as a Tier 1 firm in all 8 categories under the IFLR(International Financial Law Review) 1000 2023 edition.

Lee & Ko was consecutively selected as a top law firm in the private wealth law category according to “Chambers High Net Worth (HNW) 2023” as published by Chambers & Partners, a world renown legal media.

In recognition of its remarkable achievements in the areas of Copyright and Design, Lee & Ko was awarded “Law Firm of the Year” at the Managing IP Asia Pacific Awards 2023 hosted by the Managing IP (MIP).

Continuing from last year, Lee & Ko has secured the highest ranking, a Gold Band, for Litigation and has been recognized as the “Highly recommended” law firm for Transactions by IAM Patent 1000.

On March 8, 2023 the South Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) issued a legislative notice regarding proposed amendments to the “Detailed Evaluation Standards for Development Projects” (the Amended Evaluation Standards). The intent of the amendments is to enhance the effectiveness of project construction and operations, as well as to minimize disputes between the developers. We expect the Amended Evaluation Standards will affect a large majority of potential investors and developers in the South Korean renewable energy market. Given the importance and potential impact of the changes, Lee & Ko has prepared a brief summary of the proposed amendments as follows.

KFTC issues advance administrative notice on amendments to Investigation and Case Handling Procedures and on enactment of Guidelines for Filing Objections

The Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) issued an advance notice with respect to proposed revisions to the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (MRFTA) which includes inter alia (i) expansion of merger notification exemptions and (ii) introduction of commitment procedures for merger control (the Proposed Revisions). There will be a public notice period until March 27, 2023 for the KFTC to obtain and gather comments on the Proposed Revisions.

On February 27, 2023, the National Assembly passed a bill containing a number of amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act (the Amended PIPA), Korea’s general data protection law.  The Amended PIPA, which represents the second step of the Korean government’s multi-step amendment process for the PIPA following the passage of the first amendment in 2020, is scheduled to go into effect from September 15, 2023, except certain provisions therein, including those relating to automated decision-making and the right to data portability.

On February 27, 2023, the National Assembly passed a bill containing a number of amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act (the Amended PIPA), Korea’s general data protection law.  The Amended PIPA, which represents the second step of the Korean government’s multi-step amendment process for the PIPA following the passage of the first amendment in 2020, is scheduled to go into effect 6 months from its promulgation date (which must take place within the next 15 days). However, certain provisions therein, including those relating to automated decision-making and the right to data portability, are scheduled to go into effect 12 months thereafter. 

On February 27, 2023, the National Assembly passed a bill containing a number of amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act (the Amended PIPA), Korea’s general data protection law.  The Amended PIPA, which represents the second step of the Korean government’s multi-step amendment process for the PIPA following the passage of the first amendment in 2020, is scheduled to go into effect 6 months from its promulgation date (which must take place within the next 15 days). However, certain provisions therein, including those relating to automated decision-making and the right to data portability, are scheduled to go into effect 12 months thereafter.

Korea’s current position and direction/trends within the global taxation context Korea’s latest tax reforms package was approved by the National Assembly in December 2022, with further details made clear by the Presidential Enforcement Decree which was published in January 2023. Before going into the details of the Korean tax reforms for 2023, it is important to consider the wider global context and domestic political context in which these reforms have been made, in order to understand some of the rationale underlying the reforms.

Much of what was discussed in the new administration's capital market policy prospects in early 2022 was carried over from election pledges. That may be why the general market protection policy was widely deployed. Regulatory authority’s intention to regulate unfair trade has been announced several times and is reflected in regulation and supervision in a variety of ways. Robust financial supervisory authorities, a revived joint investigation team for securities crimes at the prosecutor’s office, and special provisions regarding listed companies in the Financial Service and Capital Markets Act of Korea (“FSCMA”) are actively working together. Let's take a look at the impact this regulatory trend will have on listed companies in 2023.

As the use of content platforms continues to grow around the world, Korea is revisiting the debate on who should be allowed to benefit from a person’s name, likeness, or other indicia of personal identity. In a global environment where almost anyone can obtain public notoriety, Korea is seeking to foster a balanced approach to unfair competition and IP enforcement by bolstering statutory protections during a time when avenues to profit from individual rights of publicity have expanded.

The Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”) proposed revisions to the Merger Review Guidelines and the Merger Filing Guidelines to facilitate merger reviews of certain investments and to expedite their review process.  With the number of filings increasing from 701 in 2018 to 1,113 in 2021, the KFTC is seeking to enhance efficiency in the merger review process and to minimize burden on the reporting party.  These revisions resulted from input by a task force created by the KFTC (composed of experts on merger filings such as practitioners and academic scholars) and consideration of comments received from the general public which concluded on November 7.  These revisions will be subject to further approval before their adoption and implementation.

In addition to the stagnation of Korea’s capital markets, as concerns about losses and damages arising from financial transactions are increasing, financial authorities are continuing to increase the level of supervision on capital markets. Recently, ‘Unfair Trading Investigation/Inspection Council’, comprised of the Financial Services Commission (the “FSC”), the Financial Supervisory Service (the “FSS”), the Korea Exchange (the “KRX”) and Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, has conducted an oversight review of the current state of inspections conducted by the KRX and investigations conducted by the FSC and FSS in relation to unfair trading, thereby increasing tension in the market.

The Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) released “2022 proposed tax law amendments” (the Proposed Amendments) on July 21, 2022 which would generally be effective from 2023.

Korea’s Act on Special Measures for Strengthening and Protecting Competitiveness of National High-Tech Strategic Industries (the Special Act) has been implemented with its accompanying Enforcement Decrees and Enforcement Rules. The Special Act aims to: (1) maintain national and economic security; (2) protect and foster strategic technologies; and (3) enhance the competitiveness of Korea’s high-tech industry.

ALB selected Lee & Ko as a top tier(Tier 1) law firm in ‘ALB M&A Rankings 2022’.

On September 14, 2022, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) announced that it had imposed record fines totaling KRW 100 billion on Google LLC (Google) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (Meta), the service provider of Facebook and Instagram, for collecting and using the behavioral data of users without consent for targeted advertisements in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA).  The respective violations committed by each company, as well as the fines and other administrative sanctions imposed thereon, are summarized in greater detail below. Details of violations and administrative sanctions The PIPC imposed an administrative penalty surcharge of KRW 69.2 billion on Google for its failure, spanning a period of 6 years, to clearly inform users during the sign-up process for its services that it would be collecting and using behavioral data (regarding their use of other companies’ websites/services) for targeted advertisements.  Similarly, the PIPC imposed an administrative penalty surcharge of KRW 30.8 billion on Meta for its failure, spanning a period of 4 years, to display mandatory notification information when obtaining consent in a manner that was easily viewable to users and for omitting to obtain their actual consent for the collection/use of behavioral data during the sign-up process for Facebook and Instagram.  According to the PIPC, such behavioral data was used by Google and Meta to analyze the interests/preferences of their users and to create individually customized advertisements for each user. The PIPC also ordered both companies to implement an “easy and clear” process for obtaining consent that would give users more control over whether to share behavioral data regarding their online activities and decided to publicly disclose its decision to issue the corrective orders. Implications This latest decision by the PIPC is notable for (i) representing the first instance in Korea where administrative sanctions were imposed on online platform operators for the unlawful collection/use of users’ behavioral data for targeted advertisements and (ii) addressing long-standing issues of controversy such as what the legal requirements should be for the collection/use of behavioral data for targeted advertisements and, where consent is required, who (online platform operators or their enterprise users) should be responsible for obtaining such consent.  Further, the fines imposed on Google and Meta are the largest ever amounts imposed for violations of the PIPA and has thereby elevated the potential risk associated with non-compliance to even higher levels. In addition, because this decision also took issue with failures to adhere to methods prescribed by the PIPA for obtaining consent, it is expected to serve as important precedent when the PIPC is determining whether the methods for obtaining consent by other online platform operators, or by online businesses in general, can be viewed as compliant with the PIPA. Lastly, the PIPC made it clear that it would continue to investigate Meta for other possible PIPA violations relating to its previous attempt (and subsequent withdrawal) to restrict the provision of its services to users who refused their consent for the collection/use of behavioral data.  As such, there is a possibility that Meta may be facing more administrative sanctions relating to, among other things, failures to differentiate between consent for the processing of personal information essentially necessary for the provision of services (i.e., required consent) and consent which is not (i.e., optional consent) as required by the PIPA. Accordingly, foreign companies that are processing the data of Korean users should be mindful of the apparent increase in potential risk associated with violations of the PIPA (including those relating to notice/consent requirements) in light of these latest developments and take precautions accordingly. If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact below: Kwang Bae PARK ([email protected]) Hwan Kyoung KO ([email protected]) Sunghee CHAE ([email protected]) Kyung Min SON ([email protected]) For more information, please visit our website: www.leeko.com

Further to the 110 national initiatives for the new administration announced on May 3, 2022 (see our newsletter dated May 10, 2022), the government released a more detailed plan to promote digital health on July 27, 2022 (the Plan). The Plan was jointly prepared by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, and the Ministry of Food and Safety.

Lee & Ko Tax Group is pleased to distribute this Tax Alert to our Clients and Friends of an important tax case recently decided by the Supreme Court of Korea (2022du36155, decided on June 16, 2022) involving certain payments for the purchase of software by a Korean subsidiary from its US parent.

Korea’s recent amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (the UCPA) strengthened the statutory framework for:

A number of important changes to the Korean Patent Act (KPA) are scheduled to go into effect from April 20, 2022. Read on to learn more about how these changes have been made to protect an applicant’s interests, provide further opportunities to obtain patent rights, and simplify a variety of procedures.

With the inauguration of Yoon Seok-yeol as the 20th president of Korea scheduled to take place on May 10, 2022, the Presidential Transition Committee (the Committee) announced 110 national initiatives for the new administration (the Initiatives) on May 3, 2022. In connection with national healthcare, (1) improvement and sophistication of countermeasure against pandemics, (2) stimulation of digital health and bio industries, (3) expansion of essential medical services and alleviation of medical cost burdens, and (4) strengthening of preventive health management are included in the Initiatives.   

Improvements to Cloud Computing and Network Separation Rules in Financial Sector On April 14, 2022, the Financial Services Commission unveiled its plans to improve regulations on cloud computing and network separation in the financial sector. This improvement plan aims to support the financial sector’s efforts for digital transformation in a stable manner, in response to the financial industry’s concerns about the difficulties in adopting and using new digital technologies because of excessive regulations on cloud computing and network separation.

On 9 March 2022, Suk-Yeol Yoon was elected as the 20th president of the Republic of Korea. As one of the central components of his campaign platform, the president-elect advocated various policy changes and reforms that could have significant impacts on the employment and labor laws in Korea.

Financial Metaverse Platform and Legal Considerations

On 05.06.2021 Legal Times reports, “The Asian Lawyer, a sister online media outlet of the American Lawyer, has selected Lee & Ko as Intellectual Property Firm of the Year in all of Asia, based on 2021 Asia Legal Awards, an online survey conducted on May 5.

Lee & Ko received the Litigation and Arbitration Award (Nullification of Korea Exchange’s Delisting) and the Advisory Award (Advising Korean Air’s acquisition of Asiana Air) at the ‘4th Korea Legal Awards 2021’.

Lee & Ko received Band 1 rankings by 'Chambers Asia-Pacific 2022’ in 12 practice areas.

On July 1, 2021, Lee & Ko was ranked No. 1 in the M&A legal advisory ranking for the first half of 2021 as hosted by Invest Chosun.

On 12th January 2022, leading Korean law firm Lee & Ko was recognised in 15 practice areas by The Legal 500, ranking tier one in 12 areas.

NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, have exploded in popularity recently in line with the surge in interest in the metaverse among companies like Meta (former Facebook) as well as investors and consumers. We discuss the characteristics of NFTs and the legal and regulatory issues relating to them.

Court Allows Lessee to Terminate Commercial Lease as COVID-19 Force Majeure.1

Korea’s recent amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (the UCPA) strengthened the statutory framework for:

The Supreme Court recently issued a judgment upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement in an international franchise agreement,(1) notwithstanding the franchisee's objection that the arbitration agreement violated mandatory provisions of Korean law intended to protect franchisees.

On July 26, 2021, the Ministry of Economy and Finance announced the government’s tax amendment proposals for 2022 (the Proposals). The Proposals are intended to (i) encourage economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, facilitate job creation and drive the growth of industry sectors that will boom in the post-COVID era; (ii) reduce the economic inequality that has worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic by giving tax benefits to small and medium sized enterprises and low-income households; and (iii) improve the tax system and strengthen taxpayer protection.

On August 25, 2021, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) announced that it had imposed various administrative sanctions (i.e., administrative penalty surcharges totaling KRW 6.66 billion, administrative fines totaling KRW 29 million, corrective orders, improvement recommendations, and publications) on Facebook[1]and Netflix for violations of the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA).  Google was also investigated but was only recommended to improve its data processing practices after the PIPC determined that it had not committed any violations of the PIPA.  The respective administrative sanctions and measures imposed on each company are summarized in greater detail below.

We introduce the key points and implications of the newly issued Financial Sector Artificial Intelligence Guidelines as below.

The amendment to the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (PAA) passed the National Assembly on June 29, 2021, and is expected to be promulgated sometime in July.

Certain amendments to the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (“Network Act”) and the Act on the Promotion of Information Security Industry (“Information Security Industry Act”) were promulgated on June 8, 2021 and are scheduled to go into effect on December 9, 2021.  These amendments contain several major changes to the chief information security officer (“CISO”) designation rules under the Network Act, and the public disclosure requirements for information security matters under the Information Security Industry Act.  Below, we provide an overview of the changes made by the promulgated amendments.

On March 24, 2021, amendment to the Design Protection Act seeking to protect graphic image (GI) designs (the Amendment) was passed during a plenary session of the National Assembly of Korea, meaning that the Amendment will go into effect six months after promulgation. The Amendment is expected to offer strengthened protection for emerging technologies such as projections, holographs, virtual/augmented reality and graphic user interface, and companies planning to use such technologies would want to check if there are related design registrations or applications. 

On March 30, 2021, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) and the European Commission jointly announced the successful conclusion of adequacy talks between the Republic of Korea (Korea) and the European Union (EU).  

In Korea, as in the United States and Japan, the recognition of patent infringement claims under the Doctrine of Equivalents (“DoE”) has been established by several key precedents.  Recently, the Korean Supreme Court provided key guidance through detailed ruling standards for two of the three factors to establish DoE infringement, namely (1) the “Substantially Identical Solution Principle” and (2) the “Substantially Identical Effect Principle.”[1]

Lee & Ko Tax Group is pleased to distribute this Tax Alert Newsletter to our clients and friends of an important tax case recently decided by the Seoul Administrative Court (2019Guhap70643, February 5, 2021) involving certain payment for the purchase of software by a Korean subsidiary to its US parent.  This case appears to disagree with the approach taken by another court in a similar matter involving the Korean subsidiary of PTC, the US computer software and services company (PTC Korea Case). 

Lee & Ko Tax Group is pleased to distribute this Tax Alert Newsletter to our clients and friends of an important tax case recently decided by the Seoul Administrative Court (2019Guhap70643, February 5, 2021) involving certain payment for the purchase of software by a Korean subsidiary to its US parent.  This case appears to disagree with the approach taken by another court in a similar matter involving the Korean subsidiary of PTC, the US computer software and services company (PTC Korea Case). 

Introduction On January 6, 2021, the Personal Information Protection Committee (PIPC) proposed and announced for public comment significant amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) (the Proposed Amendments). We discuss some of the key aspects of the Proposed Amendments in greater detail below.

On January 8, 2021, the National Assembly passed new legislation titled the Major Accident Punishment Act (MAPA) as part of its initiative to demand greater accountability from corporate actors in the event of a large-scale accident. The MAPA’s legislative objective is to set forth more specific parameters on the management’s responsibility to ensure occupational health and safety and impose greater sanctions to ensure compliance with the law.

A series of legislations affecting the criminal law landscape in Korea have been enacted since the end of 2019 e.g., ‘Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials Act’, ‘Prosecutor’s Office Act’ and ‘Criminal Procedure Act’, followed by the establishment of subsidiary laws and regulations. In addition, with the passage of the amendment bill of ‘High-Ranking Official’s Crime Investigation Agency Act’ in December 10th, sweeping changes to the overall law enforcement system are expected.

On November 25, 2020, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the “KFTC”) imposed a fine of USD 11 million on Gaztransport & Technigaz (“GTT”), a multinational engineering company headquartered in France, for abusing its market dominance in liquefied natural gas (LNG) container tank technologies (the “LNG Technology”). Although GTT argued that the tying of its patented LNG Technology together with its container tank engineering assistance services (the “Engineering Services”) is inseparable, the KFTC determined that this tying is illegal. The KFTC decision reaffirms the principle that there are limits to the activities of a market dominant patent holder. This case is summarized in greater detail below.

In August 2018, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the KFTC) drafted a bill to substantially amend the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (the MRFTA) and submitted the amendment bill to the National Assembly in November 2018. However, only certain portions of the amendment bill which dealt with procedural regulations were passed by the National Assembly on April 29, 2020, and the remaining portions of the amendment bill automatically expired without further action at the end of the term of the 20th National Assembly in May 2020.

Following the July 2019 amendment to the Patent Act introducing punitive damages for patent infringement, the Korean National Assembly has since passed additional legislation to strengthen the protection of IP rights. The new legislation includes amendments to the Trademark Act, the Design Protection Act and the UCPA (Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act), introducing punitive damages for trademark and design infringement and idea theft, as well as an amendment to the Patent Act, removing the requirement of a complaint from the injured party to initiate a criminal case for patent infringement. The amendments to the Trademark Act, Patent Act and Design Protection Act will become effective October 20, 2020, and the UCPA amendments April 21, 2021. All of the amendments will be applicable to infringing acts or thefts arising after the amendments go into effect. A brief summary of the amendments follows:

One of the most significant changes brought upon by COVID-19 is the increase in contact-free transactions, which triggered rapid increases in the market concentration of the online platform industry. In response to such changes, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the KFTC) proposed the “Fair Intermediation Transactions on Online Platform Act” (the Online Platform Act) to enhance the transparency and fairness in online platform transactions.

On August 20, 2020, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (“MFDS”) announced a proposed amendment to the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (“PPA”) aimed to address certain deficiencies in the Patent-Approval Linkage System that went into effect in 2015.  Key features of the proposed amendment may be summarized as follows.

On July 22, 2020, the Ministry of Economy and Finance publicly released the 2020 draft Tax Revision Bill (the ‘Draft Bill’).

Amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act (‘PIPA’) and Credit Information Use and Protection Act (‘Credit Information Act’) that were promulgated on February 4, 2020 took effect on August 5, 2020, along with their respective implementing regulations that were also amended to reflect the changes in the two laws. By balancing the need for the protection of personal information against the need for its wider use, the amended laws aim to pave the way for a data-driven economy. In practice, the sweeping nature of the amendments are expected to bring about significant changes in the way personal information is processed in Korea. I.  Amendments to the PIPA and the Enforcement Decree of the PIPA The amendments to the PIPA include, among others: the introduction of pseudonymized information and the legal basis for using pseudonymized information for research and statistical purposes without the data subject’s consent; the introduction of the compatibility concept; the transfer of the Act on the Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection’s (‘Network Act’s’) personal information-related provisions to the PIPA; and the elevation of the Personal Information Protection Commission’s (‘PIPC’s’) status to the sole supervisory authority responsible for the enforcement of the PIPA (accordingly, personal information protection matters that are currently handled by multiple agencies (i.e., the Ministry of the Interior and Safety and the Korea Communications Commission) will all be handled by the PIPC instead).Meanwhile, the amendments to the Enforcement Decree of the PIPA that have been adopted include, among others: the specification of rules regarding the use and management of pseudonymized information such as the security measures which must be implemented and the specification of the procedures for combining pseudonymized information among different entities; the specification of the standards used to determine compatibility; the transfer of the personal information-related provisions in the Enforcement Decree of the Network Act to the Enforcement Decree of the PIPA; and the addition of certain types of information to the scope of ‘sensitive information.’Further details on the above changes are provided below. (1) Use of Pseudonymized Information (A) Security Measures for Pseudonymized Information Under the amended PIPA, the stringent consent-oriented regulations on processing have been relaxed, allowing data handlers to process pseudonymized information without the consent of the data subject for purposes including statistical compiling, scientific research, and record preservation for the public interest. However, in order to minimize the risk of re-identification and any other harm that may be caused to data subjects in relation to the processing of pseudonymized information, the PIPA requires that anyone who processes pseudonymized information must implement certain statutorily-prescribed security measures. The amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA specifies these security measures as follows: The same security measures that are required with respect to general personal information must be implemented for pseudonymized information as well. In other words, the security measures stipulated under the ‘Standards of Personal Information Security Measures’ must be taken. (The ‘Standards of Personal Information Security Measures,’ which is an implementing regulation of the PIPA, sets forth the detailed security measures that must be applied to general personal information under the PIPA.) Pseudonymized information and additional information (i.e., information which can be used to identify a specific individual by restoring the pseudonymized information to its original state) must be stored separately, and access rights to each of these two types of information must also be segregated in order to prevent the re-identification of the pseudonymized information through the use of the additional information.(B) Restriction on Combining Pseudonymized Information Although the amended PIPA promotes the use of pseudonymized information, combining pseudonymized information between different entities is restricted in that the process may be conducted only by professional institutions designated by the PIPC (‘Specialized Agencies’) or by the head of a pertinent central administrative agency, which currently is a requirement unique to Korea. Also, the combined information may only be transferred out of the Specialized Agency after obtaining the approval of the head of the said institution. The detailed process and method of combining pseudonymized information is stipulated in the amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA. Under the amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA, an entity that wishes to combine pseudonymized information (‘Applying Entity’) must first submit its request/application to the Specialized Agency. After the Specialized Agency combines pseudonymized information in a way that makes the specific data subject unidentifiable, the Applying Entity must pseudonymize or anonymize such combined information in a space where technical, organizational and physical measures necessary for the secure processing of personal information have been implemented, installed at the Specialized Agency. The Applying Entity must obtain the approval of the Specialized Agency in order to be able to export the combined information, in which case the Specialized Agency applies the following criteria in determining whether to grant the request: the purpose for which the pseudonymized information has been combined is related to the information to be exported; there is no likelihood that an individual might be identified due to such export of information; and measures are taken to ensure the security of the information to be exported.Once the Specialized Agency approves the export request, they may bill the Applying Entity for the costs associated with the combination and export of the pseudonymized information. More details on the combining and removal of pseudonymized information will be provided in the ‘Public Notice on the Combination and Removal of Pseudonymized Information’ to be issued by the PIPC.   (2) Compatibility Provision - Standards for the Further Use and Provision of Personal Information within the Scope Reasonably Related to the Original Purpose of Collection The amended PIPA allows data handlers to use or provide personal information to a third party without the consent of the data subject if the scope of such further use or provision is within the scope reasonably related to the original purpose of the collection. As such, the amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA provides detailed standards on what qualifies as ‘reasonably related to’ (i.e., compatible with) the original purpose of collection. In making this determination, the following factors are to be considered: the processing is related to the original purpose for which the personal information was collected; the processing was foreseeable in light of the circumstances surrounding the collection of such personal information or the customary practice of processing such personal information; the processing does not unfairly infringe the rights and interests of the data subject; and whether pseudonymization, encryption, or other necessary safeguards to ensure the security of the personal information have been implemented.The amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA also requires that (i) the data handler disclose the standards which form the basis on which the above factors are assessed in its privacy policy and (ii) the Chief Privacy Officer check whether the further use and provision of personal information occurs in accordance with these standards.   (3) Others (A) Transfer of Network Act’s Personal Information-related Provisions to the PIPA Prior to the PIPA’s amendment, regulations on the processing of personal information by information and communications service providers and recipients of personal information provided by such information and communications service providers were set forth in the Network Act. However, in line with the transfer of such provisions to the PIPA, the personal information-related provisions under the Enforcement Decree of the Network Act have also been transferred to the Enforcement Decree of the PIPA. Examples of such provisions include those on the implementation of security measures, method for confirming the legal guardian’s consent, method of notification and report of personal information leakages, destruction of personal information of inactive users (i.e., users who have not shown any account activity for at least 1 year), notification of personal information usage details/records, and criteria for calculating penalty surcharges. (B) Expanded Scope of Sensitive Information Under the amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA, (i) biometric data such as fingerprint, iris, and face and (ii) race and ethnicity data are newly added to the scope of sensitive information, which was previously defined to just include information on an individual’s ideology, creed, membership of a labor union or political party, political view, health, sexual preferences, genetic information, and criminal records. (C) Additional Developments Following the enforcement of the amended PIPA and its Enforcement Decree, the PIPC is expected to issue more practical guidance on the standards for pseudonymization and combining pseudonymized information through the ‘Pseudonymization Guidelines’ and ‘Guidelines on the Combination and Export of Pseudonymized Information,’ respectively. The current ‘Manual on Personal Information Protection Laws, Guidelines, and Public Notices’ will also be updated to reflect the recent amendments to the PIPA and its Enforcement Decree.   II.  Amendments to the Credit Information Act and the Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act   The amendments to the Credit Information Act are broader and more diverse than the amendments to the PIPA as they include provisions on data protection as well as the regulatory system for the use and management of credit information (please see our previous newsletter for more information). This newsletter will discuss the provisions in the amended Credit Information Act and the amended Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act relating to data protection which may be enforced by the Financial Services Commission (‘FSC’)/Financial Supervisory Service (‘FSS’) (if provisions apply to financial companies) or the PIPC (if provisions apply to non-financial companies which process personal credit information). Thus, the Credit Information Act will apply ahead of the PIPA where an entity processes personal credit information regardless of whether such entity is in the financial sector or not. As in the case of the amended PIPA, the amended Credit Information Act also provides legal grounds for the processing of pseudonymized information without consent and introduces the compatibility concept. However, the amended Acts may differ, in terms of the permitted scope of data processing without consent and other details in application, so companies are advised to review closely these differences when processing pseudonymized information. Also, unlike the amended PIPA, the amended Credit Information Act contains provisions (taking effect from February 4, 2021) which (i) grants data subjects the right to request financial companies and public institutions to transmit their personal credit information to other financial companies (i.e., the right to data portability) and (ii) streamlines (simplify and visualize) the consent process so that data subjects may provide their informed consent more easily. Accordingly, the amended Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act contains detailed provisions related to the processing pseudonymized information, the right to data portability, and streamlining of the consent process. For this newsletter, we summarize in greater detail below the provisions related to the processing of pseudonymized information as follows:   (1) Security Measures for Pseudonymized Information Similar to the amended PIPA, the amended Credit Information Act requires the implementation of certain security measures to ensure the safety of pseudonymized information. Accordingly, the amended Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act sets forth detailed standards of such security measures and measures necessary to prevent pseudonymized information from being combined with additional information. However, there are certain important differences between the measures required under the respective Acts. For example, with respect to the specific security measures which must be taken for pseudonymized information, if the Credit Information Act applies then security measures prescribed by the ‘Regulations on the Supervision of Credit Information Businesses’ (issued under the Credit Information Act) will need to be implemented as opposed to the security measures prescribed by the ‘Standards of Personal Information Security Measures’ (issued under the PIPA). As such, it would be advisable for companies to review closely these differences when processing pseudonymized information.   (2) Restriction on Combining Pseudonymized Information Similar to the amended PIPA, the amended Credit Information Act provides that the combination of pseudonymized information managed by different data handlers may be performed only by a Specialized Agency. However, because the details on the combination process and the Specialized Agencies permitted to combine pseudonymized information are different under the amended PIPA and the amended Credit Information Act, it will be important to confirm which law applies to the situation at hand to ensure the request for the combination of pseudonymized information is made to the appropriate Specialized Agency.   (3) Retention Periods for Pseudonymized Information The amended PIPA and the amended Enforcement Decree of the PIPA do not impose any particular restrictions on the retention of pseudonymized information. Thus, unlike in the case of ordinary personal information, there is no requirement to retain pseudonymized information only for the minimum duration necessary to achieve the purposes of processing. On the other hand, the amended Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act provides that pseudonymized information may be retained past the retention period of ordinary personal credit information only when retention is within a pre-determined retention period set after considering the following: level of administrative, physical, and technical protection needed to protect the pseudonymized information and additional information;  effect on the credit information subject in the event re-identification takes place through the pseudonymized information;  possibility of re-identification from the pseudonymized information; and  the purpose for the processing of the pseudonymized information and the minimum duration necessary to achieve such purpose.The FSC published additional guidance on the safe processing of anonymized data and pseudonymized information through its ‘Guide to the Processing of Anonymized and Pseudonymized Information in the Financial Sector’ on August 6. Meanwhile, the ‘Regulations on the Supervision of Credit Information Businesses,’ which further specify certain matters prescribed by the amended Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act, are also expected to be soon published by the FSC.   If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact below:   Kwang Bae PARK ([email protected]) Hwan Kyoung KO ([email protected]) Sung Hee CHAE ([email protected]) Kyung Min SON ([email protected])   For more information, please visit our website: www.leeko.com  

On July 22, 2020, the Ministry of Economy and Finance publicly released the 2020 draft Tax Revision Bill (the ‘Draft Bill’). Amidst the increasing risk of a global recession caused by the COVID 19 pandemic, the Draft Bill aims to: (i) promote investment and spending; (ii) enhance tax benefits to low-income earners and mid-sized and small-sized enterprises; and (iii) provide tax incentives for job creation in order to minimize the negative economic impact of COVID 19. The Draft Bill is also seeking to harmonize the Korean tax system to changes occurring in the global economy, to ease compliance burdens, and to avoid double taxation. A summary of some key tax law proposals in the Draft Bill is provided below.

There have been recent amendments to the Electricity Business Act (‘EB Act’) (the main Act governing the granting of permits required to develop and operate renewable energy projects in Korea) that are likely to affect a large majority of potential investors in Korean solar farm projects. As is discussed below, the legislative amendments are due to take effect in October of this year and there is currently scope for interested parties to make submissions in respect to some of the more important potential exceptions to be enacted. There are a number of changes, however, the most significant change includes a prohibition on the sale or acquisition of a solar farm business prior to the relevant business reaching commercial operation. Although the changes were introduced in March 31, 2020 the relevant exceptions to the most important rule change have only recently been published for public comment. Given the importance and potential impact of the changes, Lee & Ko has prepared a brief summary of the anticipated changes and draft exceptions. Further, and for convenience, we have also included the relevant details on how to make submissions (below).

There have been recent amendments to the Electricity Business Act (‘EB Act’) (the main Act governing the granting of permits required to develop and operate renewable energy projects in Korea) that are likely to affect a large majority of potential investors in Korean solar farm projects. As is discussed below, the legislative amendments are due to take effect in October of this year and there is currently scope for interested parties to make submissions in respect to some of the more important potential exceptions to be enacted. There are a number of changes, however, the most significant change includes a prohibition on the sale or acquisition of a solar farm business prior to the relevant business reaching commercial operation. Although the changes were introduced in March 31, 2020 the relevant exceptions to the most important rule change have only recently been published for public comment. Given the importance and potential impact of the changes, Lee & Ko has prepared a brief summary of the anticipated changes and draft exceptions. Further, and for convenience, we have also included the relevant details on how to make submissions (below).

New hybrid approach covering full scope of infringing sales (lost profits + reasonable royalty)  On May 20, 2020, the Korea National Assembly approved a bill to amend the Patent Act, adopting a so-called hybrid damages approach – where a patentee will be entitled to seek a royalty, as additional damages, for sales that exceed the patentee’s production capacity.  Lost profits for infringing sales up to the patentee’s production capacity will remain in place.  

While Korea has had considerable success in containing and curtailing the first wave of the novel coronavirus outbreak (‘COVID-19’), the ongoing spread of the pandemic continues to disrupt the global economy, significantly impacting businesses and companies in all industries worldwide.  As a result, businesses and companies both within Korea and throughout the world are increasingly confronting a wide range of legal issues – including, for example, whether the concept of force majeure, the doctrine of frustration of contract or hardship may be invoked upon as an excuse under a contractual relationship.  In addition, discussions on whether recent governmental regulations and restrictions intended to contain the COVID-19 outbreak may in and of itself be qualified as a force majeure event (or an event that gives rise to the application of the doctrine of frustration of contract or hardship) is also being considered as a separate but important related topic as well.

Benefit of invention now a more important factor for inventiveness On May 14, 2020, the Supreme Court held, for the first time, that even if there are no facially apparent difficulties in combining certain prior art technologies to arrive at a particular patented invention, such combination would not be easy and thus inventiveness of the claim at issue should not be denied where the benefit of the claimed invention is hard to predict.

On April 7, 2020, an amendment to the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (the ‘PAA’) came into effect to provide a statutory basis for administrative and criminal sanctions to be enforced against companies that have obtained regulatory approval for a drug product through deceitful or otherwise improper means.

The amendment to the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information (hereinafter, the “Specified Financial Information Act”), which defines cryptocurrency as a “virtual asset” and focuses on a reporting system for cryptocurrency exchanges, was ratified in the National Assembly’s plenary session on March 5, 2020.

Application of the flat tax rate to “a foreign employee who worked in Korea for a period which ended before January 1, 2014, and recommenced working in Korea after January 1, 2014”

The Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology (the “Act”) provides for the protection of national core technologies held by Korean companies, research institutes, professional institutions and universities (each a “Protected Entity”) and prevention of their leakage. The Act was revised as of February 21, 2020 and the revised Act was went into effect on the same day. The revised Act introduces hurdles for any foreign investor seeking to obtain control over a Protected Entity (whether through a direct investment, merger or joint venture) (“Triggering Transaction”) by introducing new pre-approval and pre-notification requirements. For a Protected Entity that holds any national core technology developed with national R&D funding, the pre-approval requirement applies, which in principle prohibits any Triggering Transaction and provides for limited exceptions. For a Protected Entity that holds any national core technology developed without national R&D funding, the pre-notification requirement applies, which in principle allows any Triggering Transaction with exceptional cases for blocking it. Any foreign investor or company seeking to obtain control over a Korean company with a strong technology portfolio would need to diligence on whether any such technology is classified as a national core technology and, if so, whether it was developed with national R&D funding and assess whether any exception may be applicable.

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled, en banc, that if a petition to correct a patent specification or drawings is granted after the conclusion of the appellate phase of a patent invalidation action, the decision granting such petition cannot be a ground for retrial under Article 451, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 8 of the Civil Procedure Act.  In doing so, the Court reversed all prior Supreme Court decisions that remanded the case for a retrial based on the same ground (Supreme Court En Banc Decision No. 2016Hu2522).

On January 9, 2020, amendments to the Credit Information Use and Protection Act (“Credit Information Act”) were passed during a plenary session of the National Assembly. These amendments to the Credit Information Act (“Amendments”) were passed in tandem with respective amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act ("PIPA”) and the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information (“Network Act”). The PIPA, the Network Act, and the Credit Information Act are collectively referred to as Korea’s 3 major data privacy laws (“Three Data Laws”). The main objectives behind the Amendments are (1) promotion of the data economy in the financial sector by, inter alia, establishing the statutory basis for the analysis and utilization of big data, (2) reform of the legal framework for the regulation of industries related to credit information by, inter alia, introducing the concept of credit information self-management (“MyData”) and revamping the existing system for regulating credit bureaus (“CBs”) that carry out credit evaluations of individuals, and (3) reinforcement of data protection in the financial sector by, inter alia, introducing the right to request transmission of personal credit information and the right to challenge decisions based on profiling. The Amendments are expected to serve as a catalyst for the increased utilization of big data and convergence of data in the financial sector, and lead to the emergence of innovative services (e.g., customized financial services catering to the needs of individual customers) and new industries related to data (e.g., MyData services, non-financial CBs). In addition, the Amendments have been designed to enhance interoperability with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) as well as the data protection regulations of other countries and thus, are expected to facilitate the processing of data by Korean companies when they conduct business abroad. The Amendments are expected to go into effect in late July or early August of this year (which will be 6 months from their promulgation date). Key provisions of the Amendments are summarized below. 1. Key Provisions of the Amendments In line with the aforementioned amendments to the PIPA, the Amendments also introduce the concepts of “pseudonymized information”, “pseudonymization”, and “anonymization”. Please refer to our newsletter dated January 14, 2020 (“Major Amendment to the Personal Information Protection Act Passed by National Assembly”) for more information on these concepts. The Amendments permit credit information handlers to provide personal credit information to third parties without the consent of personal credit information subjects to the extent such provision is not inconsistent with the original purpose of collection after considering factors such as the circumstances surrounding the collection of personal credit information, the potential impact to personal credit information subjects, and whether necessary safeguards have been implemented to ensure the security of personal credit information. The Amendments breakdown CBs into subcategories (whereas under the current Credit Information Act, CBs are defined rather broadly without such distinction) such as “CBs for individuals,” “CBs for sole proprietorships,” and “CBs for corporations” while relaxing regulatory entry barriers for each subcategory. In addition, CBs are no longer prohibited from engaging in other types of commercial enterprise so long as there is no risk of harming credit information subjects or undermining the soundness of credit transactions due to such commercial endeavors. The concept of MyData services will be introduced which will allow individuals to, among other things, conduct integrated searches of their own credit information as well as carry out credit and asset self-management. The consent system will be streamlined (simplified and visualized) to enable credit information subjects to provide their “informed consent” and a rating system will be introduced for the use of information, such that different ratings will be assigned to the use of information depending on the risk(s) and benefit(s) associated with such use so that credit information subjects can make informed decisions when providing their consent (taking effect within 1 year from the promulgation date of the Amendments). Credit information subjects will be granted the right to challenge (i.e., request explanations and raise objections) decisions based on profiling (i.e., automated processing of data to evaluate certain things about an individual). Credit information subjects will be granted the right to request financial companies and public institutions to transmit their personal credit information (i.e., right to data portability of personal credit information) to other financial companies (taking effect within 1 year from the promulgation date of the Amendments). The maximum amount of punitive damages that may be imposed on financial companies and other credit information handlers in connection with the leakage of personal credit information has been increased to 5 times (from the current 3 times) the amount of proven damages. 2. Implications for companies likely to be affected by the Amendments With the introduction of the concepts of pseudonymized information and anonymized information, companies are advised to review the scope of data processing that will be permitted under the amended Credit Information Act without the need to obtain consent as well as the methods to utilize pseudonymized information, safeguards to prevent the combination of data, and ex post facto control measures. In light of the expected changes in the legal framework for the regulation of CBs, companies planning to expand into the CB business are advised to carefully consider the conditions for entry into this business segment, potential synergies with their existing business, and growth opportunities as well as constraining factors. With the introduction of MyData services, the Amendments will serve to minimize entry barriers for Fintech companies. Accordingly, companies planning to provide MyData services are advised to begin preparations in advance to obtain necessary licenses and approvals. Companies are advised to pay special attention to the changes to the legal provisions governing consent and the newly created rights that will be granted to credit information subjects under the amended Credit Information Act. In particular, financial regulatory authorities are expected to establish and announce corresponding amendments to consent forms and other detailed measures prior to the effective date of the amended Credit Information Act and thus, companies are advised to continue monitoring related developments on this front. Given that the Financial Services Commission has announced its intention to hold future discussions to canvass public opinion for corresponding amendments to the implementing rules (e.g., the Enforcement Decree of the Credit Information Act) of the Credit Information Act, companies are advised to closely monitor the amendment process and to provide their input as necessary to promote their business interests. Companies are also advised to closely review the amendments to the PIPA and the Network Act that were passed by the National Assembly along with the Amendments, and make the necessary preparations to their practices in light of the changes that are expected to occur once these amendments take effect. If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact below: Kwang Bae PARK ([email protected]) Jongsoo (Jay) YOON ([email protected]) Hyun Koo KANG ([email protected]) Hwan Kyoung KO ([email protected]) For more information, please visit our website: www.leeko.com

With the recent pre-announcement of a draft amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the International Tax Coordination Law (“EDITCL”), Korean tax law is expected to adopt simplified transfer pricing requirements relating to “low value-adding intra-group services”, as laid out in Action 10 of the OECD BEPS Report.

On January 9, 2020, amendments to Korea’s 3 major data privacy laws (“Three Data Laws”), i.e., Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”), Act on the Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (“Network Act”), and Credit Information Use and Protection Act (“Credit Information Act”), were passed at a plenary session of the National Assembly of Korea.

Greater Reforms for Promoting Work-Life Balance – Changes to the Gender Equal Employment and Work-Life Balance Support Act Starting 1 October 2019, employees would benefit from significant changes to the Gender Equal Employment and Work-Life Balance Support Act (“GEEA”), particularly concerning paternity leave and workhours reduction for childcare and family care. These changes are also expected to have material implications for employers with regard to general compliance obligations and require employers to review their practices in engaging employees and other workforce flexibility measures to adapt to the legislative changes. We have summarized the notable changes as follows.